Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]Ruby the Liberal
(26,219 posts)32. No, this trial is about 2 sets of attorneys
attempting to play the "whats the meaning of is" game in a battle of wits to prove who is smarter.
Noting, I expected nothing less.
TopBack to the top of the page
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
ShareGet links to this post
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Not trying to make excuses for the guy, but didn't his affair and the baby come after '04
WI_DEM
Apr 2012
#1
Yes - his affair was late in 2006. I doubt his ego would've needed salve in 2006 if he was VP, and
blm
Apr 2012
#11
I think he came to believe he was untouchable, so something similar probably would
gateley
Apr 2012
#6
I bigger issue for me is the fact that knowing all this he ran in 2008 ANYWAY....
truebrit71
Apr 2012
#15
What does she have to do with it? The girlfriend wouldn't have been a problem.
RB TexLa
Apr 2012
#44