Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: CA-SEN: Katie Porter swipes at special interests, billionaires and Adam Schiff [View all]betsuni
(25,736 posts)96. Ambiguous and passive-aggressive, like saying some people are saying the election was rigged or
some people are saying a candidate is the lesser of two evils, etc. -- much safer.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
119 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
CA-SEN: Katie Porter swipes at special interests, billionaires and Adam Schiff [View all]
RandySF
Mar 6
OP
Oh wow! She actually said "rigged"??? I'm beyond disgusted! SHAME! SHAME! SHAME!
Oopsie Daisy
Mar 7
#80
"hungry for leaders that break the mold" -- what mold? What "establishment" and why are they "running scared"?
betsuni
Mar 6
#3
I don't think you noticed, but Warren doesn't attack her colleagues as corrupt sexists.
betsuni
Mar 6
#12
Thanks for sharing that. That description of your interaction with her certainly comports with *
Oopsie Daisy
Mar 7
#73
It's a tough loss and she's passionate about using government to make our lives better
Bucky
Mar 6
#8
I completely get that it was a tough loss, but think back to Hillary, Kerry, or Gore's concession
karynnj
Mar 6
#10
I don't know, I'm kind of tired of pissed off people fighting. I'd like to see reasonable people thinking
Walleye
Mar 6
#29
And he is a team player and did not endorse Nina Turner...who continues to attack our Party.
Demsrule86
Mar 6
#40
Sorry Katie, the billionaires and corporations don't feel you are sufficiently trustworthy to support their interests.
jalan48
Mar 6
#18
Really? You are playing the Nina Turner card Katie, and that is disgraceful. Not only that, you are implying that
JohnSJ
Mar 6
#32
Exactly what I thought. Nina Turner, Cornel West types -- no future in that direction.
betsuni
Mar 6
#35
There was nothing subtle about it at all and that was more than simply "implying" *
Oopsie Daisy
Mar 7
#78
Ambiguous and passive-aggressive, like saying some people are saying the election was rigged or
betsuni
Mar 7
#96
Katie, maybe the people believe that Adam will make a better US Senator than you would.
republianmushroom
Mar 6
#38
Sad to see her invoked the "rigged" rhetoric against fellow Democrats. That sounds like a certain Orange Shitstain.
SoFlaBro
Mar 7
#49
+1 Rec. She didn't have to take the fucking shit all the way to "rigged" election. That is Orange Fuckstain talk.
SoFlaBro
Mar 7
#56
I'm puzzled. Voters were manipulated and mesmerized by ads? They have Stockholm syndrome or something?
betsuni
Mar 7
#61
After Biden is sworn in this January, he should replace Garland with Katie Porter.
patphil
Mar 7
#82
She's been in Congress 4 fucking measly years and she THREW away her seat at the table. I'm pretty annoyed at this
GuppyGal
Mar 7
#94