Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: CA-SEN: Katie Porter swipes at special interests, billionaires and Adam Schiff [View all]awesomerwb1
(4,268 posts)53. Awful "concession" speech
I really liked at first, but then the little white boards began to give one hit wonder vibes . And then she went on to endorse Nina Turner. Nina friggin Turner. Wth?
And then saying the election was rigged, is just too much. Go Schiff, bye bye Katie.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
119 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
CA-SEN: Katie Porter swipes at special interests, billionaires and Adam Schiff [View all]
RandySF
Mar 6
OP
Oh wow! She actually said "rigged"??? I'm beyond disgusted! SHAME! SHAME! SHAME!
Oopsie Daisy
Mar 7
#80
"hungry for leaders that break the mold" -- what mold? What "establishment" and why are they "running scared"?
betsuni
Mar 6
#3
I don't think you noticed, but Warren doesn't attack her colleagues as corrupt sexists.
betsuni
Mar 6
#12
Thanks for sharing that. That description of your interaction with her certainly comports with *
Oopsie Daisy
Mar 7
#73
It's a tough loss and she's passionate about using government to make our lives better
Bucky
Mar 6
#8
I completely get that it was a tough loss, but think back to Hillary, Kerry, or Gore's concession
karynnj
Mar 6
#10
I don't know, I'm kind of tired of pissed off people fighting. I'd like to see reasonable people thinking
Walleye
Mar 6
#29
And he is a team player and did not endorse Nina Turner...who continues to attack our Party.
Demsrule86
Mar 6
#40
Sorry Katie, the billionaires and corporations don't feel you are sufficiently trustworthy to support their interests.
jalan48
Mar 6
#18
Really? You are playing the Nina Turner card Katie, and that is disgraceful. Not only that, you are implying that
JohnSJ
Mar 6
#32
Exactly what I thought. Nina Turner, Cornel West types -- no future in that direction.
betsuni
Mar 6
#35
There was nothing subtle about it at all and that was more than simply "implying" *
Oopsie Daisy
Mar 7
#78
Ambiguous and passive-aggressive, like saying some people are saying the election was rigged or
betsuni
Mar 7
#96
Katie, maybe the people believe that Adam will make a better US Senator than you would.
republianmushroom
Mar 6
#38
Sad to see her invoked the "rigged" rhetoric against fellow Democrats. That sounds like a certain Orange Shitstain.
SoFlaBro
Mar 7
#49
+1 Rec. She didn't have to take the fucking shit all the way to "rigged" election. That is Orange Fuckstain talk.
SoFlaBro
Mar 7
#56
I'm puzzled. Voters were manipulated and mesmerized by ads? They have Stockholm syndrome or something?
betsuni
Mar 7
#61
After Biden is sworn in this January, he should replace Garland with Katie Porter.
patphil
Mar 7
#82
She's been in Congress 4 fucking measly years and she THREW away her seat at the table. I'm pretty annoyed at this
GuppyGal
Mar 7
#94