Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Joe BidenCongratulations to our presumptive Democratic nominee, Joe Biden!
 

floppyboo

(2,461 posts)
17. Here's a link to the original Dec.19 GQ article by Jentleson:
Sun Dec 29, 2019, 11:17 PM
Dec 2019
https://www.gq.com/story/bernie-sanders-elizabeth-warren-winning-2020

If you look at the moderates and progressives as blocs, they’re within a few points of each other straight down the line, with each side trading leads nationally, in the early states and in the massive group of states that votes on March 3rd, aka Super Tuesday. It’s easy to see how these blocs will polarize, but polarization is not inevitable. To the contrary, a range of reliable data suggests that polarization is likely only if a moderate wins early states—and that by contrast, Democratic voters will quickly rally behind a progressive.

Second-choice support gives us an idea of where voters will flow as the field winnows, and it shows that all roads lead to the progressives. According to the measures of second-choice support tracked by the Economist and Morning Consult, Warren and Bernie are the second choice of each other’s supporters—predictably. But they’re also the second choice of Biden and Buttigieg’s supporters. So if Warren or Sanders win in early states, they’re poised to easily attract the supporters of the moderates, quickly unifying the party. But if a moderate wins early primaries and one of the progressives fades, most of the losing progressive’s supporters are likely to go to the other progressive, not the moderate—leading to a polarized and potentially very long primary.
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
COULDN'T AGREE MORE!! I'LL TAKE BOTH... THANK YOU VERY MUCH!! InAbLuEsTaTe Dec 2019 #1
No thanks. We have a far better candidate. The Valley Below Dec 2019 #2
+1 TexasTowelie Dec 2019 #15
The article was posted on DU a couple weeks ago. The author's assertions are a bit misguided. TwilightZone Dec 2019 #3
Sanders is a unity candidate? Quite the opposite. calimary Dec 2019 #6
Please... billpolonsky Dec 2019 #12
Precisely, calimary! Cha Dec 2019 #21
"BS a unity candidate.." Cha Dec 2019 #18
LOL. Not recommended. nt UniteFightBack Dec 2019 #4
In 1980 , the Chattering Class believed the American people would never ritapria Dec 2019 #5
Democratic voters are more moderate than most think. Here's some numbers that bare itout Thekaspervote Dec 2019 #10
No, I don't want any Democratic candidate to make empty promises. TexasTowelie Dec 2019 #16
Won't happen. highplainsdem Dec 2019 #7
Thank heavens!! Thekaspervote Dec 2019 #11
. Hassin Bin Sober Dec 2019 #8
made me LOL. RazBerryBeret Dec 2019 #9
. Hassin Bin Sober Dec 2019 #20
Fine With Me colsohlibgal Dec 2019 #13
So what? BannonsLiver Dec 2019 #14
Here's a link to the original Dec.19 GQ article by Jentleson: floppyboo Dec 2019 #17
Love The Onion. NT TidalWave46 Dec 2019 #19
That will never happen Renew Deal Dec 2019 #22
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»Democratic Strategist urg...»Reply #17