However, you're dead wrong about Hillary putting the USA into "neutral".
That's a crock of shit.
She's a hawk. Not just "hawkish", but deep down in the bones a warmongering hawk and her term as SOS was a disaster for the world, as bad as *. In fact, she immediately hired Cheney's neocon advisor. She'll advance the cause of the MIC, of war profiteers.
Both she and her husband have taken payola in the form of cash for "speeches" to a totally new level - what'd they rake in, $200 million? More? Bill raking it in even while Hillary was SOS. Totally shameless about it, too, so totally convinced that her third-way team has the Dem party sewn up, that no amount of openly displayed political graft would be a threat to her victory. She'd give the country away to the banks, no question about it. Which is why her campaign is running from her history, from her record, and refuses to debate on those issues.
That is NOT NEUTRAL. It is an acceleration of the rightward push of US politics.
The result of a HRC win in primary then GE would be total devastation for the Democratic party - 8 more years of further unopposed consolidation of oligarchic power.
I would vote only for progressives. I would work - as Bernie says NEEDS TO BE DONE - on building a grass roots progressive movement. Building the infrastructure. Not just in election years! Not just during a campaign, obsessively focused as they are on personalities and gimmickry.
OK, said enough - you get the picture.