Gun Control Reform Activism

norge

(6 posts)

30. An Appalling Lack of Civility Here

Wed May 1, 2013, 05:09 PM

May 2013

Scuba, why do you feel the need to be so hostile? Is no one allowed to believe in gun control, but think that requiring gun owners to carry liability insurance might be going too far? So that if someone agrees with your viewpoint in all but that single issue, you respond with "Take your NRA bullshit elsewhere". What a sad commentary on the idea that this could be a forum for a civilized discussion. With all due respect to your right to respond as you see fit, I must say that your response brings to mind the image of a right-wing religious fundamentalist preacher that tells his congregation "Believe and think and do exactly as I say, right down to the Nth degree, or you are condemned to Hell! I cast you out from this church!" Is this really the message you want to convey?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

32 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

"Guns don't kill people. People kill people." [View all] Scuba Apr 2013 OP

K & R! billh58 Apr 2013 #1

And we want PEOPLE to take out liability insurance Warpy Apr 2013 #2

But that would infringe billh58 Apr 2013 #3

Alright supernaut Apr 2013 #4

You DO know where you are billh58 Apr 2013 #6

I will when I publish a newspaper, novel, or magazine. Warpy Apr 2013 #7

Uh supernaut Apr 2013 #8

Warpy isn't the one who is enlightenment Apr 2013 #26

Sometimes it's just not billh58 Apr 2013 #10

Take your NRA bullshit elsewhere. Scuba Apr 2013 #9

An Appalling Lack of Civility Here norge May 2013 #30

Civility is a language inherently alien to bullet-heads. lastlib May 2013 #31

^^^^ ellisonz Apr 2013 #17

and PPR'd now too...like so many at DU who get blocked here then PPR'd shortly after CreekDog Apr 2013 #29

But, but, what about... freshwest Apr 2013 #5

Are you renouncing future AWB's & magazine limits? appal_jack Apr 2013 #11

You're in the wrong forum.... Scuba Apr 2013 #12

So, asking questions is forbidden here? appal_jack Apr 2013 #13

Your premise was that if one is for background checks, one must not also be for magazine limits. Scuba Apr 2013 #15

Post removed Post removed Apr 2013 #16

If you think magazine capacity limits are unconstitutional, you are definitely in the wrong place. DanTex Apr 2013 #18

It's you who are confused, Dan. appal_jack Apr 2013 #19

The belief that magazine limits are unconstitutional puts you well to the right of Scalia. DanTex Apr 2013 #20

Regarding the new, & the effective. appal_jack Apr 2013 #21

Regarding liberalism, & libertarianism. appal_jack Apr 2013 #22

Post removed Post removed Apr 2013 #24

Name calling all you have? Mwc33 Apr 2013 #25

Well. aren't you the billh58 Apr 2013 #27

Hey ~ Mwc33 In_The_Wind May 2013 #32

And yet another Gungeoneer billh58 Apr 2013 #14

Well said. (nt) Paladin Apr 2013 #23

You nean bans/limits on *PEOPLE* owning those things? -eom gcomeau Apr 2013 #28