Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

CrispyQ

(36,646 posts)
16. Actually, I would have thought an all female jury might be more sympathetic to a 17 year old boy.
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 03:03 PM
Jul 2013

As to the OP, here's how it will go.

The media will focus on what she wears, how she looks, how she interacts with other men, how she interacts with other women, but most comparisons will be gender based.

Repub male politicians, the vile ones in particular, will not be able to keep their mouths shut. We will hear even more appalling garbage spewed. It will bring out the worst in them.

At the state level, even more will be incensed that a woman is in the White House. They will 'show us' by carrying out even more draconian anti-woman legislation.

Among the people, if she's thin & pretty, a lot of men will dismiss her authority but say how much they would like to fuck her. If she's not thin, a lot of men will dismiss her authority and call her a cow & that's the kindest thing they will say. Most of these men are repubs, but we have them in our party, too.

For young women & girls, it will be good, a ceiling broken. It will always be a struggle, but there is always, "If someone else did it, I can too." I know a woman who makes six figures selling Mary Kay & that is her mantra.


on edit: I would never vote for someone based on gender.

It would likely be a positive for girls/women but provoke a backlash amongst a large geek tragedy Jul 2013 #1
So? CTyankee Mar 2015 #23
Not an argument against it by any means. geek tragedy Mar 2015 #24
a lot of times the first person just breaks the barrier. it's the second person unblock Jul 2013 #2
no heaven05 Jul 2013 #3
Only If... highmindedhavi Jul 2013 #4
I think it would be interesting MadrasT Jul 2013 #5
Yes.... that thread(s?) blaming "women" for the acquittal was dismal. hlthe2b Jul 2013 #7
Actually, I would have thought an all female jury might be more sympathetic to a 17 year old boy. CrispyQ Jul 2013 #16
there's never been a female president and we are OVER HALF THE POPULATION Skittles Mar 2015 #20
We have clues fredamae Jul 2013 #6
Extract the lesson from your own example: malthaussen Jul 2013 #8
Sure. Just consider the hugely dramaatic differences between Hillary and Elizabeth. Scuba Jul 2013 #9
The issue is the response to the first female President, not the political differences between hlthe2b Jul 2013 #10
My point was there are going to be differences even between two women, let alone a woman and a man. Scuba Jul 2013 #11
Consider Margaret Thatcher. truebluegreen Jul 2013 #12
Good example, especially since Hillary reminds me way too much of the Hatchet Lady. Scuba Jul 2013 #14
Me too. truebluegreen Jul 2013 #15
It would be a small step in the right direction BainsBane Jul 2013 #13
It would turn over rocks and let the worms crawl out ismnotwasm Jul 2013 #17
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2015 #18
A small one, another peeble in what is on slow, but unstoppable outcome ismnotwasm Mar 2015 #19
I think it would change the way women and girls see themselves in this country geek tragedy Mar 2015 #21
+1 YoungDemCA Mar 2015 #25
It would be good for domestic policies, but make no difference to foreign policy eridani Mar 2015 #22
True enough. And if they somehow make to the White House and try to start dismantling it from within villager Mar 2015 #26
All change provokes a reactionary backlash. Agnosticsherbet Mar 2015 #27
Yes, it would fredamae Mar 2015 #28
It would be good but I am looking forward to it being more than the first woman elected Thinkingabout Mar 2015 #29
unfortunately I fear it would not drray23 Mar 2015 #30
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»History of Feminism»I can't help but wonder: ...»Reply #16