Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts) Sun Dec 27, 2015, 02:26 AM Dec 2015

11 votes, 1 pass \| Time left: Unlimited
	It was a deliberate data breach ordered by the Sanders campaign high command
	0 (0%)
	It was a Sanders staffer acting alone, and the candidate and campaign leadership had nothing to do with it
	3 (27%)
	It was a mole planted in the Sanders campaign by DWS/the Clinton campaign in order to discredit Sanders
	2 (18%)
	I'd rather wait for more facts to emerge before offering any theories.
	6 (55%)
	1 DU member did not wish to select any of the options provided.
Show usernames Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll

20 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Which do you believe is the more like scenario for the data breach? [View all] Ken Burch Dec 2015 OP

Yep. Nt. Juicy_Bellows Dec 2015 #4

I have my suspicions about Josh being a mole, but have no proof 99th_Monkey Dec 2015 #2

I'm going with what Bernie said gwheezie Dec 2015 #3

I don't believe that what Urtesky did was intentional Chitown Kev Dec 2015 #5

What sort of issues-based campaigns murielm99 Dec 2015 #9

I think that may have meant cause campaigns rather than election work. Ken Burch Dec 2015 #10

Exactly Chitown Kev Dec 2015 #13

The buck stops with Bernie ucrdem Dec 2015 #12

That's what I think. MoonRiver Dec 2015 #19

Much ado about nothing. longship Dec 2015 #8

Number 2 is most likely Kalidurga Dec 2015 #11