Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

JRLeft

(7,010 posts)
Wed Aug 17, 2016, 11:20 AM Aug 2016

Ken Salazar to lead her transition team! WTF? [View all]

He's horrible, no one should support that asshole leading anything. Pro fracking, shitty on the environment, pro TPP, and Pro Keystone XL.

Hillary Clinton has named her transition team should she be elected in November, and the roster—as many feared—is a who’s-who of establishment figures, including former Interior Secretary Ken Salazar, who has a maligned track record on climate.

The team will also include former national security adviser Tom Donilon, former Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm, president of the Center for American Progress (CAP) Neera Tanden, and director of Harvard University’s Institute of Politics Maggie Williams. Two of the campaign’s policy advisers, Ed Meier and Ann O’Leary, will also serve as co-executive directors.

Salazar, whose career includes positions both in government and corporate Washington, D.C. firms, has previously pushed for projects that are reviled among environmental activists, such as fracking, the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP), and the Keystone XL pipeline.

> Snip

“Historically, too many Wall Street executives and corporate insiders have traveled through the revolving door between private industry and government,” the letter stated. “The result of this practice is that the interests of elites are over-represented in Washington.”


http://m.truthdig.com/report/item/clinton_transition_team_headed_by_anti-climate_power_broker_20160816

268 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Post removed Post removed Aug 2016 #1
OUTSTANDING CHOICE!!! BRAVO, HILLARY!!!!!! MohRokTah Aug 2016 #2
His environmental record, the fact he is a lobbyist though unregistered doesn't bother you? JRLeft Aug 2016 #6
Pluses, IMO. MohRokTah Aug 2016 #8
Extreme left? You sound like a tea party member. JRLeft Aug 2016 #12
does far left sound better? snooper2 Aug 2016 #15
It's all relative. Wilms Aug 2016 #22
Often, they call themselves "dittoheads", FoxNewsSucks Aug 2016 #230
I think "left behind" is ultimately the most appropriate term. BobbyDrake Aug 2016 #23
Winner!! misterhighwasted Aug 2016 #30
^^This! n/t Tarheel_Dem Aug 2016 #88
Ouch ! I felt that all the way from Western Canada Monk06 Aug 2016 #150
This country has moved so far to the right that the actual middle is called far or extreme left. JRLeft Aug 2016 #29
negative snooper2 Aug 2016 #32
Sorry that's incorrect. emulatorloo Aug 2016 #35
Highly inaccurate. NCTraveler Aug 2016 #66
Absolutely correct! choie Aug 2016 #125
This country has moved so far to the right G_j Aug 2016 #167
Right leaning democrats believe they are progressive. JRLeft Aug 2016 #185
Dismayed by above posters. Words have no meaning it seems. George Eliot Aug 2016 #187
No they do not. JRLeft Aug 2016 #268
Flag on the play... MohRokTah Aug 2016 #25
I'm going to steal that pict... fleabiscuit Aug 2016 #129
What??? PatSeg Aug 2016 #24
Yes, seems to be happening, the 'war' to which you refer. elleng Aug 2016 #77
Yeah, not like anything I've seen here before PatSeg Aug 2016 #96
Hi, PatSeg. elleng Aug 2016 #97
I sent you a PM PatSeg Aug 2016 #99
Agreed womanofthehills Aug 2016 #184
Yes PatSeg Aug 2016 #186
I think we have to let Hillary know this is unacceptable before the election adigal Aug 2016 #153
Yes, silence is consent PatSeg Aug 2016 #163
Seems odd to predicate liking someone simply on who else may or may not dislike them as well LanternWaste Aug 2016 #34
Welcome to DU. eom MohRokTah Aug 2016 #40
did you just welcome someone to DU bonemachine Aug 2016 #224
Extreme left? Do you even know what the term means? Exilednight Aug 2016 #45
I've known the "purer than thou" Extreme Left for decades. MohRokTah Aug 2016 #61
it's pretty obvious you use phrases in which you don't know the definition. Exilednight Aug 2016 #63
Strange, it seems you have no understanding of what constitutes the Extreme Left. eom MohRokTah Aug 2016 #71
When someone starts acting like Che Guevara, then you have an argument. Exilednight Aug 2016 #76
BWAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!! MohRokTah Aug 2016 #81
My seven year old does the same thing when she knows she lost an argument. Exilednight Aug 2016 #104
Man, if you think you hold all that is true about what is and what is not Extreme Left,... MohRokTah Aug 2016 #107
Struck a nerve... .99center Aug 2016 #117
I use 100 ROFLs whenever somebody posts someting SO RIDICULOUS... MohRokTah Aug 2016 #120
That's the problem I usually find. Everyone wants an echo chamber, and when someone disagrees they a Exilednight Aug 2016 #123
The far left (Greens ET AL).. those who will never back the Democrat before or after an election.. Demsrule86 Aug 2016 #171
Nice rant. Where's your proof? George Eliot Aug 2016 #198
Struck a nerve? choie Aug 2016 #128
I have been watching for some time for what that trip-wire of left/right is. fleabiscuit Aug 2016 #133
It's pretty clear that is a choie Aug 2016 #126
So you have a big framed picture of Joe Lieberman in your living room, then? Warren DeMontague Aug 2016 #169
Flag on the play... MohRokTah Aug 2016 #170
No, that's not an ad hominem. Warren DeMontague Aug 2016 #196
Flag on the play... MohRokTah Aug 2016 #197
You're flailin', cuz you know I'm right. Warren DeMontague Aug 2016 #233
Flag on the play... MohRokTah Aug 2016 #234
What alternate viewpoint? Warren DeMontague Aug 2016 #235
Flag on the play... MohRokTah Aug 2016 #236
Yes, we do. Warren DeMontague Aug 2016 #237
Flag on the play... MohRokTah Aug 2016 #238
Irony. Warren DeMontague Aug 2016 #239
He's wrong all of the time, therefore he will never answer your questions. JRLeft Aug 2016 #246
This has to do with being against everyday Americans rockfordfile Aug 2016 #209
This has to do with the Extreme Left labeling anybody who isn't "PURE" as a Corporatist. MohRokTah Aug 2016 #210
Hear hear! El Supremo Aug 2016 #151
No I don't think so rockfordfile Aug 2016 #207
he's not the nominee, he's heading up an administrative function nt geek tragedy Aug 2016 #3
He is not that bad anyway...but you are correct. nt Demsrule86 Aug 2016 #5
Not just "an" administrative function -- Hell Hath No Fury Aug 2016 #156
Can you remember who Obama's was, off the top of your head? geek tragedy Aug 2016 #157
Sqeezy lobbyist John Podesta (IIRC) was head -- Hell Hath No Fury Aug 2016 #161
yes, the most liberal and most successful presidential administration geek tragedy Aug 2016 #162
That's ridiculous. George Eliot Aug 2016 #188
Ok. Tell us who was more liberal/successful. geek tragedy Aug 2016 #189
Depending on issues, many. Pre Reagan/Clinton the country was more liberal. George Eliot Aug 2016 #199
LMAO. geek tragedy Aug 2016 #200
You are opening yourself up to attacks to point out negatives because George Eliot Aug 2016 #204
are you counting "Operation Wetback" amongst Ike's liberal achievements? geek tragedy Aug 2016 #205
If I were, it would be there, wouldn't it? George Eliot Aug 2016 #212
I asked you who was more liberal/successful than Obama. geek tragedy Aug 2016 #214
Do I remember Podesta, Rahm Emanuel and Valerie Jarrett? JackRiddler Aug 2016 #244
Do you really believe what you're writing? JackRiddler Aug 2016 #243
Good choice Hillary Demsrule86 Aug 2016 #4
I'm reporting you for making reasonable points.... OnDoutside Aug 2016 #13
I know right? Demsrule86 Aug 2016 #46
support for our land and water through fracking and huge pipelines - not wanted by anyone I know womanofthehills Aug 2016 #255
At the time the president supported the pipeline Demsrule86 Aug 2016 #266
Excellent! NurseJackie Aug 2016 #7
So the complaint about an administrative role is...policy? whatthehey Aug 2016 #9
Anyone that doesn't agree with 2016's progressive agenda.. SaschaHM Aug 2016 #10
Who's on a candidates transition team, tends to tell you how one will govern. JRLeft Aug 2016 #11
Not really whatthehey Aug 2016 #14
How about an example. Demsrule86 Aug 2016 #47
Never heard of him treestar Aug 2016 #16
He was the replacement 2naSalit Aug 2016 #108
What did he do to deserve the conclusion that he is lacking in treestar Aug 2016 #109
Just a few articles to remind us 2naSalit Aug 2016 #118
That source does not even attempt objectivity treestar Aug 2016 #140
well 2naSalit Aug 2016 #148
Salazar quote: "We know that, from everything we’ve seen, there’s not a single case where hydraulic womanofthehills Aug 2016 #182
Crickets chirping... George Eliot Aug 2016 #203
he's really not horrible, that's just insane hyperbole. La Lioness Priyanka Aug 2016 #17
Good pick. nt LexVegas Aug 2016 #18
Agreed - very bad pick if you care at all about the environment. womanofthehills Aug 2016 #183
Oh god, it's already beginning. auntpurl Aug 2016 #19
It's stuff like this that make it so easy to be dismissive of the far left. NurseJackie Aug 2016 #20
I some times despise the Far Left even more than the Far Right MohRokTah Aug 2016 #26
If they were, they'd pick better candidates. I mean, seriously now ... Stein? NurseJackie Aug 2016 #41
No surprise there, birds of a feather flock together. TheKentuckian Aug 2016 #94
The "Nothing But The Best For The Oppressed" syndrome. . . DinahMoeHum Aug 2016 #127
Yeah, you're right. It's not a clean environment is essential to human life. Exilednight Aug 2016 #48
Lefty here shocked to hear real Democrats being disparaged. tecelote Aug 2016 #58
No, it's actually the regressive, privliged, amoral, puritopian rainbows and pixie dust Maru Kitteh Aug 2016 #166
I guess someone will have to figure out if strategic wins but occasionally compromising are worse NurseJackie Aug 2016 #59
Nothing tough about it. The laws of nature do not compromise. Exilednight Aug 2016 #73
Just ask President Kucinich. NurseJackie Aug 2016 #74
I can't believe how the people in the posts above you talk about liberals adigal Aug 2016 #154
And that is part of the debate. Who will he recommend for Exilednight Aug 2016 #160
They're emotional voters. They love, love, love and so are blind to the meaning George Eliot Aug 2016 #206
Sometimes I sit back and reflect auntpurl Aug 2016 #68
One of the major reasons many of us on what you term the "far left", have been critical of the ACA cali Aug 2016 #83
When I used the term moron, I was referring to Trump's RW supporters auntpurl Aug 2016 #86
A public option is a huge step for single payer. And in country after country cali Aug 2016 #98
I agree. Old and In the Way Aug 2016 #106
The tags "far left" and PatSeg Aug 2016 #102
That's right choie Aug 2016 #130
F**king up the environment is not a "little thing." womanofthehills Aug 2016 #193
That's true, but intentionally sabotaging or not supporting the best candidate ... NurseJackie Aug 2016 #195
When it comes to the environment, we don't have time for incremental change. JRLeft Aug 2016 #247
So why pursue a route of guaranteed failure and stagnation? NurseJackie Aug 2016 #248
We're already failing because are not doing what scientists have told us to do. JRLeft Aug 2016 #249
And putting forward "pure" candidates (who have zero chance of winning) helps, HOW? NurseJackie Aug 2016 #250
I don't think people are saying they are not supporting Hillary womanofthehills Aug 2016 #254
And as I have pointed out Demsrule86 Aug 2016 #49
Read Bill Press "Buyers Remorse" - that's how Obama lost the far left George Eliot Aug 2016 #208
Why would I read Bill Press who like many who are ...I won't say on the left Demsrule86 Aug 2016 #242
YUP ... Combustible Hair Club is holding preliminary meetings ... JoePhilly Aug 2016 #65
lol auntpurl Aug 2016 #67
"Combustible Hair Club"!!! Tarheel_Dem Aug 2016 #89
Their orchestra is tuning up. Everyone she chooses will be deemed awful. Squinch Aug 2016 #122
A lot of those who went after Obama Andy823 Aug 2016 #78
Apparently the "new rules" are staying in effect even after the election auntpurl Aug 2016 #79
I hope you are right Andy823 Aug 2016 #82
But saying you hate the Far Left as much as the Far Right is fine, right? adigal Aug 2016 #158
The only way you can post here and disrupt is pretending you are to the left of everyone else here. Old and In the Way Aug 2016 #134
Exactly. treestar Aug 2016 #176
What a horrid article wrought with hyperbole. NCTraveler Aug 2016 #21
EXACTLY. Here's the Actual Transition Team Headline: misterhighwasted Aug 2016 #56
He's as shitty a pick now, as he was when Obama foisted him upon us in Interior. villager Aug 2016 #27
Yeah and after he was shown the error of his ways by electing Republicans...things were so much Demsrule86 Aug 2016 #50
Um, he was part of the "error of ways" that led to the election of Republicans in the midterms villager Aug 2016 #52
No, he wasn't...no person can please everyone...the fact many Demsrule86 Aug 2016 #60
He was an awful choice for Interior, a squandering of "hope and change." Timorous Democrats lose villager Aug 2016 #75
Right and we showed him too Demsrule86 Aug 2016 #116
They showed us! We'll piss on that mandate and... wait? What? No one's still voting!? nt villager Aug 2016 #121
We never had a working majority in the Senate thus and we faced Demsrule86 Aug 2016 #139
So our retroactive excuse is that the majorities we had the first two years... villager Aug 2016 #141
Our "majority" included such liberal powerhouses as Joe Lieberman (sic). PBass Aug 2016 #145
"I wonder how closely you were paying attention during this period" villager Aug 2016 #146
These people need to blame ... rather than hold their candidate responsible. George Eliot Aug 2016 #211
We never had a working majority ...not with Kennedy ill and then Scott Brown, Lieberman Demsrule86 Aug 2016 #172
Thank goodness the best strategy was a preemptive caving in on everything... villager Aug 2016 #175
+1 George Eliot Aug 2016 #213
90% of something like for instance Demsrule86 Aug 2016 #245
Somehow the climate is not changing "incrementally." Nor has it been "incremental" for those priced villager Aug 2016 #252
Once you lost the house put a fork in it ...done. Demsrule86 Aug 2016 #253
We agree that the anti-democratic practice of gerrymandering needs to end. villager Aug 2016 #263
Absolutely the gerrymander needs to end Demsrule86 Aug 2016 #265
Yes, re: Gerrymander. But we disagree on that first two years. I think they were woefully villager Aug 2016 #267
This message was self-deleted by its author Dem2 Aug 2016 #149
I'm noticing a very unsettling tendency PatSeg Aug 2016 #28
There are about three LOUD members here who label some folk 'far left' emulatorloo Aug 2016 #33
Yes PatSeg Aug 2016 #91
Thanks for the wisdom. I'm getting reactive myself in response. George Eliot Aug 2016 #215
You're welcome PatSeg Aug 2016 #222
It is unsettling. KeepItReal Aug 2016 #36
I hope so PatSeg Aug 2016 #92
Yep. a la izquierda Aug 2016 #37
Just a handful of people say that shit. Alert on their posts and put them on ignore emulatorloo Aug 2016 #38
Damn proud to be part of the Looney Left! Hell Hath No Fury Aug 2016 #42
Gee PatSeg Aug 2016 #100
Maybe you could tell us what this op has to do with the environment. NCTraveler Aug 2016 #43
Why anyone left of center should be cozying up to fracking supporters is beyond me. NT a la izquierda Aug 2016 #137
As someone else said, PatSeg Aug 2016 #93
And you and your buddies get to judge who is progressive and who isn't I suppose. Demsrule86 Aug 2016 #112
I'm sorry PatSeg Aug 2016 #135
I don't agree with Obama on everthing either. I don't like the TPP for one example. Demsrule86 Aug 2016 #138
We can support candidates PatSeg Aug 2016 #143
We were not realistic in our expectations of Obama Demsrule86 Aug 2016 #144
Okay, I definitely agree with you PatSeg Aug 2016 #147
It is just a term...I see no stigma in it...nothing wrong with being left...I am a Demsrule86 Aug 2016 #173
Well PatSeg Aug 2016 #174
You show wisdom again by staying neutral and avoiding name calling and blaming. Thank you. George Eliot Aug 2016 #217
Thank you! PatSeg Aug 2016 #223
Welcome to the new and improved Democratic Party! Hell Hath No Fury Aug 2016 #39
Seems to be a FEW Democrats PatSeg Aug 2016 #95
Well that HAS been the goal since around 1990 -- Hell Hath No Fury Aug 2016 #159
That was an interesting flashback PatSeg Aug 2016 #165
Exactly my thoughts. Trump is hastening that merging of right and DLC centrist dems. George Eliot Aug 2016 #218
It will be interesting to see what happens to the PatSeg Aug 2016 #225
Millennials make a difference. Check out this link. George Eliot Aug 2016 #231
Very interesting PatSeg Aug 2016 #251
We (heart) the Keystone pipeline - I want one of those running through my yard womanofthehills Aug 2016 #194
And we hate renewal energy, PatSeg Aug 2016 #226
Actually, I almost had a KinderMorgan pipeline running through my property womanofthehills Aug 2016 #256
Oh wow PatSeg Aug 2016 #260
Really? Demsrule86 Aug 2016 #53
I guess Spliff the Bike Courier's voicemail box was full Sen. Walter Sobchak Aug 2016 #31
Is Fracking Bad? zenabby Aug 2016 #44
I think you mean "Fracking ain't so bad." KeepItReal Aug 2016 #55
Besides poisoning the water & our food supply Motley13 Aug 2016 #57
I don't know Salazar, BUT DFW Aug 2016 #51
HERE FOR THE FULL STORY: Outstanding Transition Team misterhighwasted Aug 2016 #54
There is some big $$ in play . CentralMass Aug 2016 #62
Can you elaborate? NurseJackie Aug 2016 #64
Here are a few links. CentralMass Aug 2016 #113
ImWithHer. This includes her judgement on whoever she choses to help oasis Aug 2016 #69
Post removed Post removed Aug 2016 #110
I'm still confused by her vision. Clarify for me please. George Eliot Aug 2016 #191
During the next 8 years you should be able to figure it out. oasis Aug 2016 #240
Haha. Looks like we'll both be figuring it out. :) George Eliot Aug 2016 #241
Clinton should speak to Obama about Salazar and why he 'resigned'. Years ago that 'Bundy' crap was Sunlei Aug 2016 #70
I'm bored with the outrage BainsBane Aug 2016 #72
i agree with you bravenak Aug 2016 #84
It's exhausting isn't it? I mean there are other places on the web to trash Democrats, this..... Tarheel_Dem Aug 2016 #90
It is exhausting, isn't it? mcar Aug 2016 #101
I would not call what's going on with our environment "a nit" womanofthehills Aug 2016 #257
OK then mcar Aug 2016 #258
Nice to see a few progressive voices here who give a damn about policy 2banon Aug 2016 #80
It's an appointment that I don't like. Period. If that makes me a traitor or loony left or cali Aug 2016 #85
^^^^This^^^^ dflprincess Aug 2016 #132
I think it makes you a progressive Democrat PatSeg Aug 2016 #136
As far as I am concerned -- Hell Hath No Fury Aug 2016 #155
The political wordsmiths PatSeg Aug 2016 #164
And there is no appointment you are likely to like treestar Aug 2016 #177
And you are so wrong. yet again. I already posted an op about how much I like cali Aug 2016 #178
Goodness you are easy to offend treestar Aug 2016 #180
And you, with the greatest of easen repeatedly toss out false smears. I find that.. cali Aug 2016 #181
You'd lose your shirt on that bet, tree. Here. What have you to say NOW? cali Aug 2016 #179
I agree but dig a little deeper . . . George Eliot Aug 2016 #219
One's views on issues has little to do with running a transistion team. Kaleva Aug 2016 #87
He most likely was choosen because he was part of the Obama Administration as still_one Aug 2016 #103
Ugh. truebluegreen Aug 2016 #105
Just her true colors shining through. alarimer Aug 2016 #111
Local boy. He's been 'round the block a few times postatomic Aug 2016 #114
Salazar and Tanden are dyed-in-the-wool DLC Democrats. DemocraticWing Aug 2016 #115
Worrisome colsohlibgal Aug 2016 #119
Well put. Has she been honest with us? George Eliot Aug 2016 #192
? fun n serious Aug 2016 #202
She is NOT going to veer center. fun n serious Aug 2016 #201
I'm holding you to that promise. George Eliot Aug 2016 #220
Sounds good to me. fun n serious Aug 2016 #221
And here come the excuses.. choie Aug 2016 #124
And Rahm Emmanuel led Obama's transition team Spider Jerusalem Aug 2016 #131
Actually, your point confirms every apprehension about Salazar. nt villager Aug 2016 #142
+1 George Eliot Aug 2016 #190
And what cabinet post will he be named to? El Supremo Aug 2016 #152
Can we please be outraged about this after the election? [win the election first,ok] bluestateguy Aug 2016 #168
Meet the new boss! ABLEZEROSIX Aug 2016 #216
JR, truth indeed is saidsimplesimon Aug 2016 #227
I support this choice. Salazar charted a measured course as cabinet official bluedye33139 Aug 2016 #228
People questioned her choice of a running mate, then this choice. How'd she do with her campaign? tonyt53 Aug 2016 #229
I think it is appropriate PatSeg Aug 2016 #262
superb choice Grey Lemercier Aug 2016 #232
Can you elaborate about what is superb? womanofthehills Aug 2016 #259
????? PatSeg Aug 2016 #261
Oddly, Michelle Malkin agrees with you on Salazar being a bad pick KMOD Aug 2016 #264
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Ken Salazar to lead her t...»Reply #0