Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Boston Herald: "Cabinet role for Mitt Romney would be a shrewd move" - Do you agree? [View all]Tippy
(4,610 posts)63. NO..he is a proven LIER
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
164 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Boston Herald: "Cabinet role for Mitt Romney would be a shrewd move" - Do you agree? [View all]
anobserver2
Nov 2012
OP
Obama appointed Gates, held over from W Bush. He also appointed other Republicans
Bluenorthwest
Nov 2012
#40
HUGE difference. A man that lied and cheated thru the election, vs Cohen who is actually a pro.
progressivebydesign
Nov 2012
#109
Appointing a retired Congressman is not remotely comparable to appointing the losing presidential
onenote
Nov 2012
#125
Senator Cohen was an intelligent and fair minded man. He did a great job as Secretary
ladjf
Nov 2012
#94
Anobserver2 .. Ann Romney? Is that you? Are you trying to get Mitt out of the house?? lol nt
progressivebydesign
Nov 2012
#110
Seems like the dead opposite of the brilliance of selecting Hillary four years ago!
JohnnyLib2
Nov 2012
#10
I think one of the disqualifying characteristics of Cabinet candidates is being a
ladjf
Nov 2012
#95
it only takes ONE person to write an editorial, ya know. And Romney has friends in Mass. nt
progressivebydesign
Nov 2012
#115
hell no. fuck that noise. he is a loser. he is a liars. he has no principle or morals. why the
seabeyond
Nov 2012
#33
Please, God, NOOOO! Mitt Romney will just use it for his own personal profit.
bushisanidiot
Nov 2012
#44
Willard can not qualify because he refuses to be vetted. Tax Returns would be
Bluenorthwest
Nov 2012
#47
Well, I still think Obama may be thinking of doing this or something like it
anobserver2
Nov 2012
#48
NO. No, he is NOT considering this. They dont' give trophies to everyone that plays.
progressivebydesign
Nov 2012
#113
I hope our newly re-elected Prez will reject the idea - just like the American people rejected
patricia92243
Nov 2012
#57
Romney voluntarily answering questions under oath in televised confirmation hearings? Can't see it.
MostlyAmused
Nov 2012
#60
I don't give a fuck about the republicans who are melting down today.
progressivebydesign
Nov 2012
#119
I doubt Romney could work for anyone - he has been the "CEO" in everything he has
karynnj
Nov 2012
#74
HELL NO. Never let Romney anywhere near a dollar of the American people's tax money again!
ancianita
Nov 2012
#83
Possibly the only thing Obama could do to make me lose all respect for him. nt
Comrade_McKenzie
Nov 2012
#87
Is this a joke? Hell No! I don't want to even see his face or read his name any more.
ladjf
Nov 2012
#92
To do what exactly? Become an embarrassment the first time he can't explain basic policy? nt.
OldDem2012
Nov 2012
#96
Why would he gain from doing that?!?! Seriously...what drugs are they on?
magical thyme
Nov 2012
#101
NO FUCKING WAY!!! Why in the hell would ANYONE give that liar a chance to improve his resume?
progressivebydesign
Nov 2012
#108
Why not instead appoint a repub current senator who can be replaced by a Democrat?
tarheelsunc
Nov 2012
#111
I'm sorry. What point of Romney's 'outsourcing IS romney's business" aren't some people getting?
progressivebydesign
Nov 2012
#121
If the President did that he'd basically be letting him open a path to running in 2016! Thx, but no!
cecilfirefox
Nov 2012
#122
Ray Lahood has done a good job, and I want him back as Transportation Secretary.
JRLeft
Nov 2012
#130
Not only NO! But hell NO! He'd be a disaster and I don't want to have to see his face or
courseofhistory
Nov 2012
#160