2016 Postmortem

pnwmom

(109,021 posts)

79. Forbes didn't write it. And the law professor who wrote it also wrote a book called

Reply to Todays_Illusion (Reply #78)

Thu May 26, 2016, 06:54 PM

May 2016

"Veering Right: How the Bush Administration Subverts the Law for Conservative Causes"

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

95 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Forbes: OIG email report vindicates Clinton [View all] pnwmom May 2016 OP

K&R mcar May 2016 #1

I love this line: "To put it differently, she is having a double standard applied to her." Arkansas Granny May 2016 #2

perfectly stated. reddread May 2016 #4

Here is the problem not addressed in the article. Alex4Martinez May 2016 #7

You left out the fact that Colin Powell DELETED ALL his AOL emails when he left office. pnwmom May 2016 #40

Was his AOL on a private server? Alex4Martinez May 2016 #91

Yes. AOL is a private company, not an arm of the government. All its servers are private. pnwmom May 2016 #92

Not true, her server was backed up by Google and McAfee...widely published... Sancho May 2016 #59

using a commercial email service provider compromises any classified info in any emails sent thru Bill USA May 2016 #86

Millions ofGovernment employees decide on a daily basis which of their work emails to save or delete politicaljunkie41910 May 2016 #93

"To put it differently, she is having a double standard applied to her." workinclasszero May 2016 #3

Awesome, another right wing endorsement of Hillary. lagomorph777 May 2016 #5

He is a professor of law at the University of Baltimore. pnwmom May 2016 #6

Being a law professor isn't much of an endorsement lagomorph777 May 2016 #8

It doesn't make you a right-winger. pnwmom May 2016 #10

Tiefer is the author of "Veering Right: How the Bush Administration Subverts sufrommich May 2016 #14

Thank you! pnwmom May 2016 #18

Not a right wing guy at all. Just a hill partisan cali May 2016 #13

Is that your knee-jerk response to every non-hater, or do you have evidence pnwmom May 2016 #48

This is a well written analysis of the issue Gothmog May 2016 #9

The problem with this situation is that..... Sivart May 2016 #11

and her private email system was hacked polio2 May 2016 #15

"her private email system was hacked" TwilightZone May 2016 #33

the guccifer doodles polio2 May 2016 #36

No it wasn't. Provide proof the email server was hacked. Fla Dem May 2016 #94

Legally, there isn't a smidgeon of difference in which non-governmental private server was used, pnwmom May 2016 #23

What law? Sivart May 2016 #31

I can't cite a law that doesn't exist. And there is no public records law that distinguishes pnwmom May 2016 #37

uh.....what?? Sivart May 2016 #41

Fine. I meant "the law" in the general sense. There is NO Federal public records law that makes pnwmom May 2016 #42

one link?? Sivart May 2016 #43

Here's another. pnwmom May 2016 #45

How conveinient... Sivart May 2016 #46

Wonder why the State Department, under HRC, was firing diplomats for conducting Press Virginia May 2016 #54

Hillary used her secure, state-department-installed SCIF system for classified documents. pnwmom May 2016 #56

Scott Gration US Ambassador to, I think, Kenya Press Virginia May 2016 #62

There is no evidence that she had any classified information on her email server pnwmom May 2016 #64

Except for the Classified Material that was found on her Server Press Virginia May 2016 #69

Please provide a link showing that there was classified information on her server pnwmom May 2016 #71

Once again. Notice the words IC ELEMENT SOURCES...that means it's classified when created Press Virginia May 2016 #74

You want me to believe a letter from CHARLES MCCULLOUGH pnwmom May 2016 #76

Let's seeeee....either the IG is lying and submitting false information to Congress Press Virginia May 2016 #81

Or maybe neither. Maybe the anonymous source is feeding McCullough lies pnwmom May 2016 #82

Hillary, landed under sniper fire because I was named after Edmund Press Virginia May 2016 #84

Considering you were flatly asserting yesterday that she had no SCIF system, pnwmom May 2016 #87

I said unless she had construction to build it she didn't have one Press Virginia May 2016 #88

You flatly asserted in posts before that one that she did NOT have an SCIF. pnwmom May 2016 #89

Uh no Press Virginia May 2016 #90

I think if you look at pg 43 or 44 of the report you'll find the case of the Nairobi ambassador floppyboo May 2016 #65

If you're talking about Gration, politifact has addressed his case pnwmom May 2016 #66

wonder why the Inspector General disagrees with Politifact? Maybe the whole report is junk? floppyboo May 2016 #67

The IG doesn't exclude other reasons being involved with his firing. n/t pnwmom May 2016 #68

Do yor really believe the IG would include a 'mostly false' bit of information? to what end? floppyboo May 2016 #70

The IG didn't make the claim you say he did. n/t pnwmom May 2016 #72

Here's the link. Read it again, then tell me where I'm wrong. pp 43-44 floppyboo May 2016 #73

This is a discussion of what he did wrong with emails, but nowhere does it say that this was pnwmom May 2016 #75

um, maybe not primary, but definitely important, and important enough for this study. floppyboo May 2016 #85

He's ignoring the smoking gun, the hacking polio2 May 2016 #12

LOL. He analyzed the report, not some doodles. n/t pnwmom May 2016 #16

Wow, that's your response to a detailed factual analysis? lagomorph777 May 2016 #17

Your response to the professor's article was to dismiss him as a right winger. I dismiss pnwmom May 2016 #19

He's employed by "flat-taxer" Steve Forbes; I figured there must be some rapport. lagomorph777 May 2016 #21

a thief who stole bill's doodles from the server polio2 May 2016 #22

You know this because of a photoshopped image? pnwmom May 2016 #26

they're authentic polio2 May 2016 #28

hah! pnwmom May 2016 #29

Hillary supporters are just like Trump supporters polio2 May 2016 #20

I thought we weren't supposed to use right wing sources? Armstead May 2016 #24

Tiefer is the author of "Veering Right: How the Bush Administration Subverts the Law pnwmom May 2016 #25

Forbes is a right wing publication owned by Steve Forbes Armstead May 2016 #32

A-friggin'-men! A massive K & R. Surya Gayatri May 2016 #27

Thank you!! fun n serious May 2016 #30

Basically she didn't follow any of the security/FAM rules of HER dept. and lied about it. jmg257 May 2016 #34

The right beating a non-story Iliyah May 2016 #35

its such a bullshit issue... ericson00 May 2016 #38

And they're still using floppy discs in some parts of the government. n/t pnwmom May 2016 #39

And that's an even bigger problem and why... scscholar May 2016 #57

Hardly a vindication. The State Dept report didn't even address classified information violations leveymg May 2016 #44

a nothingburger. Lil Missy May 2016 #47

LOL Forbes must have missed the lesson on private email accounts vs. private email SERVERS. Avalux May 2016 #49

No, the law professor who wrote this understands that there is NO legal distinction pnwmom May 2016 #52

Please provide links to back up your assertions, thanks. n/t Avalux May 2016 #55

Here: pnwmom May 2016 #60

I said this yesterday Dem2 May 2016 #50

I wrote in an earlier thread ... 1StrongBlackMan May 2016 #51

Have you ever worked for the government? Avalux May 2016 #53

Yes ... Most of my career ... 1StrongBlackMan May 2016 #58

Yes! And you are rewarded if you push the limits as much as possible pnwmom May 2016 #77

the professor displays his ignorance. nt grasswire May 2016 #61

Yes! The problem is that those who.. LAS14 May 2016 #63

Well that is one endorsement that a liberal would want to avoid, libertarian flat taxer anti-minimum Todays_Illusion May 2016 #78

Forbes didn't write it. And the law professor who wrote it also wrote a book called pnwmom May 2016 #79

So it just accidentally appeared on the Forbes site? I am not going to visit that malware Todays_Illusion May 2016 #80

OBVIOUSLY, this Tiefer MUST be a TOOL of the anti-Christ Hillary Clinton. Bernie groupies aren't Bill USA May 2016 #83

of course this will mean nothing to the Repugnants "for" Bernie posting here Bill USA May 2016 #95