Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

cosmicone

(11,014 posts)
20. aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahahahahahahahahahahahaha
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 06:05 PM
Mar 2016

The author's bio (in his OWN words)

I have no background in investigative journalism or law. I have not gone to law school, journalism school, or ever worked for a newspaper, magazine or any other publication. That’s why you may see scattered typos, grammar mistakes and incorrect legal phrasing. I tried to write this as deeply and as quickly as possible before I thought this story would be told by someone else. Please send proof-reads my way if you notice any, I am still going back and correcting mistakes here and there.

I have written only two other lengthy works.

My Economics thesis which analyzed the merger between two biotech companies – Thermo Fisher Scientific and Life Technologies.

And a class report for the Center for International Trade and Security – surrounding the United Nation’s decision to militarily intervene in Libya, but not Syria, during the Arab Spring.


This should be a good gauge of just how misinformed DU posters are ... nt salinsky Mar 2016 #1
Some are misinformed and some just want to see Hillary suffer. Jackie Wilson Said Mar 2016 #29
She will not be and should not be. morningfog Mar 2016 #2
This. Agschmid Mar 2016 #5
If she should not be TeddyR Mar 2016 #50
There are a variety of laws that could have been broken. morningfog Mar 2016 #56
I doubt it, but I don't know if she should be or not. ZombieHorde Mar 2016 #3
I'd like to see the results of the FBI investigation B2G Mar 2016 #4
For what? zappaman Mar 2016 #6
for being Hillary Clinton. nt geek tragedy Mar 2016 #15
Three possibilities: indicted, unindicted co-conspirator, unindicted Impedimentus Mar 2016 #7
rule of law vs executive exceptionalism reddread Mar 2016 #8
For the email crap? No. Hell Hath No Fury Mar 2016 #9
If they'd just investigate the apparent sale of access while SOS senz Mar 2016 #38
To me, THAT is where the real story is -- Hell Hath No Fury Mar 2016 #48
I agree, this transcends party and goes to the heart of democratic governance. senz Mar 2016 #52
Accusation is proof. creon Mar 2016 #10
Recommended by FBI for indictment; not indicted by Obama DoJ. Attorney in Texas Mar 2016 #11
Virtually no difference between Bernie Sanders supporters geek tragedy Mar 2016 #12
It will also be a good PPR list for Skinner n/t cosmicone Mar 2016 #14
Push polling of a non-issue -- devious cosmicone Mar 2016 #13
it's a public service, this poll helps identify geek tragedy Mar 2016 #17
+1 ... very true. n/t cosmicone Mar 2016 #18
the next step will be them accusing Lynch and Obama of official corruption for covering it up. geek tragedy Mar 2016 #21
Sadly it's true. Dem2 Mar 2016 #32
In what way is this a push poll? I tried very hard to word it fairly (nt) TacoD Mar 2016 #22
It is quite simple cosmicone Mar 2016 #24
In your example, TacoD Mar 2016 #25
I think your poll is very well worded and provides a useful service to the community geek tragedy Mar 2016 #27
Thanks :-) nt TacoD Mar 2016 #30
Just because the whole echo chamber is claiming something cosmicone Mar 2016 #46
I just posted this.... blueintelligentsia Mar 2016 #16
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahahahahahahahahahahahaha cosmicone Mar 2016 #20
You're digging deep for this one. WhiteTara Mar 2016 #43
Since I'm not an FBI agent or the Attorney General, Vinca Mar 2016 #19
Democrats don't seem to care about Clinton's email server issue geek tragedy Mar 2016 #23
No idea and won't speculate. riderinthestorm Mar 2016 #26
Wealthy powerful bad guys always "get away with murder." senz Mar 2016 #28
This is an illuminating poll. hrmjustin Mar 2016 #31
Illuminating enough to open any eyes? senz Mar 2016 #45
A lot of law and order Bernie supporters apparently Onlooker Mar 2016 #33
I don't see a single Bernie supporter voting that Clinton shouldn't be indicted geek tragedy Mar 2016 #34
Reply #2? (nt) TacoD Mar 2016 #36
You're right, there's one! nt geek tragedy Mar 2016 #40
Partial explanation for why we're not Clinton supporters. senz Mar 2016 #42
That is their last hope out of desperation. cosmicone Mar 2016 #47
thank goodness for closed primaries to prevent such people from sabotaging us nt geek tragedy Mar 2016 #49
Hear hear!! n/t cosmicone Mar 2016 #53
Message auto-removed Name removed Jul 2016 #57
I doubt that she'll be indicted. Blue_In_AK Mar 2016 #35
Powerful Clinton people don't get in trouble when they commit crimes jfern Mar 2016 #37
so you've concluded she's a criminal. Outstanding! geek tragedy Mar 2016 #41
I haven't got a clue whether she'll be indicted or not. BillZBubb Mar 2016 #39
Probably not bigwillq Mar 2016 #44
Of course not. Oligarchies don't work that way. lumberjack_jeff Mar 2016 #51
Of course not. NanceGreggs Mar 2016 #54
Does it make any difference? tularetom Mar 2016 #55
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Do you think Hillary will...»Reply #20