Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Science

Showing Original Post only (View all)

eridani

(51,907 posts)
Tue May 17, 2016, 05:45 AM May 2016

This scientist just changed how we think about climate change with one GIF [View all]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/2016/05/11/this-scientist-just-changed-how-we-think-about-climate-change-with-one-gif/

The image has resonated for a number of reasons — one of them being, as Hawkins says, that it “doesn’t require any complex interpretation.” It uses data that was always there, of course — data from the UK Met Office’s Hadley Centre and the University of East Anglia’s Climatic Research Center which document the globe’s average temperature anomaly monthly and annually going back to the year 1850. (Two U.S. agencies, NASA and NOAA, do the same but only go back to 1880).

Hawkins took these monthly temperature data and plotted them in the form of a spiral, so that for each year, there are twelve points, one for each month, around the center of a circle – with warmer temperatures farther outward and colder temperatures nearer inward. At the same time, he took the pre-industrial baseline temperature to be the average temperature from 1850 to 1900, and put out markers for where a 1.5 degree Celsius rise above that temperature would be, and where at 2 degree Celsius rise would be, in the form of larger, red concentric circles.

And then, of course, he made the whole thing animated and tweetable.

47 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Brilliant! Bob Loblaw May 2016 #1
That is terrifying. SusanCalvin May 2016 #2
Looks like we are about to step things up a bit this year. Yeah us. n/t A Simple Game May 2016 #3
Wow yardwork May 2016 #4
You wish the headline to be true Bernardo de La Paz May 2016 #5
I think they may be too busy dying to ask questions. It's gonna be a much different jtuck004 May 2016 #11
I meant -- ask them these days. Now. Hence the question is in future tense, to be asked now. nt Bernardo de La Paz May 2016 #14
I know, but it makes little difference. They are too busy with their texting and cell phones and jtuck004 May 2016 #18
It saddens me to see you only are critical of Republicons. The corporations have to make rhett o rick May 2016 #25
No. Bernardo de La Paz May 2016 #35
You can see it accelerating alfredo May 2016 #6
It's a trick (lying with graphs), though I think there is acceleration in the last 15 years. Bernardo de La Paz May 2016 #13
OK alfredo May 2016 #15
It's still linear. Just depicted in a circle... Beartracks May 2016 #29
No. Linear lines, not linear rate of change. It turns a linear rate into a squared 'geometric' rate. Bernardo de La Paz May 2016 #34
Do you think that once you actually see them? muriel_volestrangler May 2016 #39
Nice example. Thx for posting. Bernardo de La Paz May 2016 #40
OK, so you're saying the 'equal radius' one is right, but you don't think we should use it? muriel_volestrangler May 2016 #41
The point is real data has IRregular increments. Bernardo de La Paz May 2016 #42
You've agreed that there aren't 'perceptual overlays' for the linear radial plot muriel_volestrangler May 2016 #43
No, I have NOT agreed. Please read more carefully. I write carefully. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz May 2016 #44
" When the increments are regular, it is easy to assess as regular" muriel_volestrangler May 2016 #45
I wrote carefully. I carefully limited the ease of assessment to regular increments. ONLY. Bernardo de La Paz May 2016 #46
You started this sub-thread by stating they are 'lying with graphs' muriel_volestrangler May 2016 #47
Kicked and recommended! nt Enthusiast May 2016 #7
K&R.. disillusioned73 May 2016 #8
But God himself could come down and tell the tea baggers that, and it wouldn't do any good. forest444 May 2016 #9
Yes and these people don't mind getting to heaven a bit sooner. peace13 May 2016 #10
Are you saying that God can't stop it? Hell humans have only been on earth a very short time. rhett o rick May 2016 #26
Well her people experiment will be doomed. peace13 May 2016 #30
The world will be OK as soon JEB May 2016 #12
STOP BlancheSplanchnik May 2016 #16
+1 chknltl May 2016 #19
But...but...Sen. Inhofe tossed a snowball in the Senate! KansDem May 2016 #17
To the deniers, this will mean nothing MynameisBlarney May 2016 #20
The deniers who also don't understand math and graphs SCantiGOP May 2016 #21
They ain't exactly known MynameisBlarney May 2016 #38
There is a candidate who thinks this #1issue... chknltl May 2016 #22
God put the fossil fuels in the ground sulphurdunn May 2016 #23
This message was self-deleted by its author cyberpj May 2016 #24
Very nice. BillZBubb May 2016 #27
I am convinced that there is nothing we can do to stop this. We are rhett o rick May 2016 #28
Even Nestle Corporation, Thespian2 May 2016 #31
Where is it going? 7962 May 2016 #32
Please note Thespian2 May 2016 #33
Wow jpmonk91 May 2016 #36
Chilling (well... I mean.... you know...) Recursion May 2016 #37
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»This scientist just chang...»Reply #0