Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
This scientist just changed how we think about climate change with one GIF [View all]
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/2016/05/11/this-scientist-just-changed-how-we-think-about-climate-change-with-one-gif/The image has resonated for a number of reasons one of them being, as Hawkins says, that it doesnt require any complex interpretation. It uses data that was always there, of course data from the UK Met Offices Hadley Centre and the University of East Anglias Climatic Research Center which document the globes average temperature anomaly monthly and annually going back to the year 1850. (Two U.S. agencies, NASA and NOAA, do the same but only go back to 1880).
Hawkins took these monthly temperature data and plotted them in the form of a spiral, so that for each year, there are twelve points, one for each month, around the center of a circle with warmer temperatures farther outward and colder temperatures nearer inward. At the same time, he took the pre-industrial baseline temperature to be the average temperature from 1850 to 1900, and put out markers for where a 1.5 degree Celsius rise above that temperature would be, and where at 2 degree Celsius rise would be, in the form of larger, red concentric circles.
And then, of course, he made the whole thing animated and tweetable.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
47 replies, 8900 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (175)
ReplyReply to this post
47 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This scientist just changed how we think about climate change with one GIF [View all]
eridani
May 2016
OP
I think they may be too busy dying to ask questions. It's gonna be a much different
jtuck004
May 2016
#11
I meant -- ask them these days. Now. Hence the question is in future tense, to be asked now. nt
Bernardo de La Paz
May 2016
#14
I know, but it makes little difference. They are too busy with their texting and cell phones and
jtuck004
May 2016
#18
It saddens me to see you only are critical of Republicons. The corporations have to make
rhett o rick
May 2016
#25
It's a trick (lying with graphs), though I think there is acceleration in the last 15 years.
Bernardo de La Paz
May 2016
#13
No. Linear lines, not linear rate of change. It turns a linear rate into a squared 'geometric' rate.
Bernardo de La Paz
May 2016
#34
OK, so you're saying the 'equal radius' one is right, but you don't think we should use it?
muriel_volestrangler
May 2016
#41
You've agreed that there aren't 'perceptual overlays' for the linear radial plot
muriel_volestrangler
May 2016
#43
No, I have NOT agreed. Please read more carefully. I write carefully. . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
May 2016
#44
" When the increments are regular, it is easy to assess as regular"
muriel_volestrangler
May 2016
#45
I wrote carefully. I carefully limited the ease of assessment to regular increments. ONLY.
Bernardo de La Paz
May 2016
#46
You started this sub-thread by stating they are 'lying with graphs'
muriel_volestrangler
May 2016
#47
But God himself could come down and tell the tea baggers that, and it wouldn't do any good.
forest444
May 2016
#9
Are you saying that God can't stop it? Hell humans have only been on earth a very short time.
rhett o rick
May 2016
#26