Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Religion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

MineralMan

(146,317 posts)
Mon Mar 25, 2019, 01:18 PM Mar 2019

One's Religion Is a Choice. It Is Not an Innate Characteristic of Anyone. [View all]

Unlike skin color, sex, sexual orientation, gender, or birthplace, one may choose one's own religion freely. That sets religious belief apart from inborn characteristics. While many people are indoctrinated into a religious belief system, it is entirely possible to change one's beliefs or to abandon religious belief altogether. Evidence of that is everywhere.

Intolerance or bigotry are directed at inborn characteristics of people, through classification. Simply not believing in some religion is in no way intolerant of anyone. Actively stating that a particular religion or deity is false is also not intolerant of anyone. It is not bigotry, either. It is simply stating one's own belief about a set of beliefs. You are welcome to say that you believe in a deity or deities and that my disbelief is incorrect.

Now, some religion might consider a negative opinion about it or dismissal of its deity or deities to be blasphemy. Blasphemy is not intolerance. It is simply disbelief or outright dismissal of the validity of a particular religious belief or deities. Most Christians, for example, do not believe that the Hindu pantheon of deities are truly of a divine nature. To a Hindu, that is blasphemy, yet most Christians believe and declare that only their deity is a deity, by definition.

I think and will declare that all deities are figments of the human imagination. I therefore blaspheme all religions that worship deities. I do not, however, condemn all believers in those deities. I simply do not believe as they do. I am not intolerant of them. I simply don't believe the deities they worship are real. In that, I am similar to a Christian who dismisses the divinity of Hindu gods. I just dismiss them all as imaginary.

If people decide that they believe in a deity and worship that deity, I don't really care. That is, or should be, irrelevant to my life. If they attempt to foist off their deity on me, however, I will reject their attempt. I have made my decision, after due consideration, and have no deities to worship. I'll be happy, though, not to obstruct your worship of some deity, as long as it doesn't interfere unduly with my life or the lives of others. I'm not intolerant of your religious beliefs, though. I just think they're superstitious, but what you believe is none of my business, really. The problem arises when you insist that I or others should or must believe as you do.



74 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
It is upsetting that we have at least one person in this group... trotsky Mar 2019 #1
Well, while I think that such ideas can be dangerous, MineralMan Mar 2019 #3
I believe such religious extremists literally cannot separate the two. trotsky Mar 2019 #4
"How do we deal with such extremists?" MineralMan Mar 2019 #6
It's a paradox... NeoGreen Mar 2019 #8
At least they aren't burning us in the town square anymore Major Nikon Mar 2019 #7
Only because it is no longer an acceptable course of action. MineralMan Mar 2019 #9
Misframing. guillaumeb Mar 2019 #12
BWAH HA HA HA trotsky Mar 2019 #13
Here's what this straw person said... Major Nikon Mar 2019 #17
This message was self-deleted by its author marylandblue Mar 2019 #22
Arguing free will zipplewrath Mar 2019 #2
I have very little difficulty with accepting free will MineralMan Mar 2019 #5
And as you age zipplewrath Mar 2019 #10
Ah, yet another philosophical quandary. MineralMan Mar 2019 #11
A question: guillaumeb Mar 2019 #14
I'll tell you what, guillaumeb: MineralMan Mar 2019 #15
But, in the absence of any evidence for either position, guillaumeb Mar 2019 #18
If there is no evidence either way, then the intellectually correct position is agnosticism. marylandblue Mar 2019 #20
If faith is absent, then I agree. guillaumeb Mar 2019 #21
non-belief demands evidence for belief, therefore is not an act of faith. marylandblue Mar 2019 #23
Non-belief is also a negation of the premise underlying belief. guillaumeb Mar 2019 #42
Do you know what a null hypothesis is? marylandblue Mar 2019 #43
Apply it to your argument. guillaumeb Mar 2019 #44
"I don't believe your assertion" is not a position, gil. trotsky Mar 2019 #45
It is a position. guillaumeb Mar 2019 #48
No, I cannot accept your false claims. trotsky Mar 2019 #50
"Any atheist who states that there is no evidence for the existence of a god is asserting guillaumeb Mar 2019 #51
Then what you are saying is misstating the atheist's position. trotsky Mar 2019 #53
We disagree. eom guillaumeb Mar 2019 #54
You didn't answer the question. marylandblue Mar 2019 #46
"faith requires no evidence" trotsky Mar 2019 #37
Exactly. Mariana Mar 2019 #71
Atheism requires no position Major Nikon Mar 2019 #24
#20 uses the same term. guillaumeb Mar 2019 #25
You are full of shit as usual Major Nikon Mar 2019 #30
From the excerpt that you included: guillaumeb Mar 2019 #39
Some Christians also take the "position" women should be subservient to men Major Nikon Mar 2019 #47
Do you admit that you were incorrect? guillaumeb Mar 2019 #49
I admitted you are incorrect Major Nikon Mar 2019 #55
You misunderstand the term "gaslighting' as well. guillaumeb Mar 2019 #56
Sure, Gullible. More gaslighting is always the appropriate apology for gaslighting Major Nikon Mar 2019 #57
Gaslighting about what gaslighting means Lordquinton Mar 2019 #60
Obviously you just don't understand how gaslighting about gaslighting works Major Nikon Mar 2019 #61
... Lordquinton Mar 2019 #63
This is normal. Don't worry about it. Major Nikon Mar 2019 #64
Theism takes the position that there is a god Lordquinton Mar 2019 #35
#20 uses the exact the same term. guillaumeb Mar 2019 #40
Biblical literalism is also a Christian position, yes? Major Nikon Mar 2019 #58
If you provide no evidence to support your position Lordquinton Mar 2019 #59
Position, belief and approach are not synonymous, Monsieur B. MineralMan Mar 2019 #62
Claiming positive atheism is the only acceptable position... Major Nikon Mar 2019 #65
Well, if Christians insist that we accept their individual labels, MineralMan Mar 2019 #66
They should Major Nikon Mar 2019 #72
MN claims that marylandblue did not use the word position. guillaumeb Mar 2019 #67
You will have to take that up with him. MineralMan Mar 2019 #70
Sure! Eko Mar 2019 #28
Sort of. Voltaire2 Mar 2019 #16
Are humans so patterned and programmed that they are unable to have free will? guillaumeb Mar 2019 #19
Most likely yes. Voltaire2 Mar 2019 #26
A very interesting position. guillaumeb Mar 2019 #27
Change the programming obviously. Voltaire2 Mar 2019 #36
That sounds unrealistic. guillaumeb Mar 2019 #41
No it wouldn't. Voltaire2 Mar 2019 #73
While I agree with you that one's religion is a choice, PoindexterOglethorpe Mar 2019 #29
Fear of the dark is natural Major Nikon Mar 2019 #31
Interesting point. PoindexterOglethorpe Mar 2019 #32
It's far easier to appeal to emotion than reason Major Nikon Mar 2019 #33
Again, thank you. PoindexterOglethorpe Mar 2019 #34
It is easier not to question what one learns as a child. MineralMan Mar 2019 #38
Not necessarily Cary Mar 2019 #52
In most case, yes, that's true customerserviceguy Mar 2019 #68
I have no experience of living in such a society, so I can't answer. MineralMan Mar 2019 #69
With all due respect, this is just plain silly. old as dirt Dec 2021 #74
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»One's Religion Is a Choic...»Reply #0