Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Video & Multimedia
In reply to the discussion: Amy Goodman of Democracy Now: How the Media Is Ruining This Election [View all]Uncle Joe
(58,643 posts)88. The "Television" Networks didn't cover the New York Times angle on the interview,
nor did the Washington Post, they all fell in line with the New York Daily News take and the owner of that publication is a Hillary supporter.
The New York Daily News and the vast majority of the corporate media conglomerates were quick to obfuscate Bernie's statement in regards to the Treasury Secretary and the Fed.
In an exchange with the New York Daily News editorial board a few days ago, Bernie said he didnt know if the Fed had authority to break up the big banks but the President does have such authority under the Dodd-Frank Act.
This drew an onslaught of criticism from the media: "Bernie Sanders Admits He Isn't Sure How to Break Up Big Banks," read Vanity Fair's headline. "This New York Daily News interview was pretty close to a disaster for Bernie Sanders," said The Washington Post.
"How Much Does Bernie Sanders Know About Policy?" asked The Atlantic. The Clinton campaign even said in a fundraising email "on his signature issue of breaking up the banks, he's unable to answer basic questions about how he'd go about doing it, and even seems uncertain whether a president does or doesn't already have that authority under existing law."
The criticism is bonkers. Bernie was absolutely correct when he said the President has the authority to break up the big banks under Dodd-Frank. He's repeatedly specified exactly how he'd use that Dodd-Frank authority to do so. His critics are confusing the Dodd-Frank Act with the Federal Reserve. Whether the Fed has the authority on its own to break up the biggest banks is irrelevant.
Clearly, Bernie has the Democratic establishment worried enough to try to twist his words into pretzels.
https://www.facebook.com/RBReich/posts/1192384144107513
The corporate media conglomerates didn't condemn Trump's early hate filled speech, they presented it as "he's winning despite this" they didn't state that he had no substance they wasted precious airtime covering him selling steaks and crap.
To his supporters this was gold, Trump is different and therefor must be better.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
103 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Excellent point. If the media had reported Bernie proportionately to what he deserved, who knows
reformist2
May 2016
#4
Most Dems voting still had only a hazy notion of who Sanders is. A lot of people are not online much
reformist2
May 2016
#20
Never any acceptance for the fact America doesn't like your candidates ideas.
AlbertCat
May 2016
#65
Actual "news" content has dropped to a minimum, "opinion & analysis" (read: spin) has taken over.
reformist2
May 2016
#6
Real news means a network must spend money on satellite time, actual reporters who can read,
LiberalArkie
May 2016
#11
It has never been easier to get accurate, unfiltered information about candidates
oberliner
May 2016
#23
This Citizen Understands That The Media Is Owned And Controlled By Seven Or Less Corporations
cantbeserious
May 2016
#26
It takes less than five seconds to find every speech Bernie has given over the campaign
oberliner
May 2016
#27
A handful of corporate media conglomerates; own 95% of everything the American People see
Uncle Joe
May 2016
#43
Stop! You're upsetting the narrative that explains why Sanders is losing the primaries!
stopbush
May 2016
#80
The corporate media conglomerates gave Trump billions of dollars in free advertising
Uncle Joe
May 2016
#83
The "Television" Networks didn't cover the New York Times angle on the interview,
Uncle Joe
May 2016
#88
I don't have a problem with criticism of any candidate if I view it as legitimate. Of course
Uncle Joe
May 2016
#95
The Editorial Board knows who their owner is and which candidate said owner supports.
Uncle Joe
May 2016
#97
Please provide a link to stats for "Bernie has been on every single news show repeatedly"
cui bono
May 2016
#36
Total BS back. Early on, Bernie got nothing whereas each new Republican and Hillary got coverage.
Festivito
May 2016
#50
The others had 10s maybe 100s attending, Bernie had 1000s and no coverage -- while the others did.
Festivito
May 2016
#57
Nice, but: cable. Those who can't afford cable hear 20 seconds of Bernie in controversy, IF THAT!
Festivito
May 2016
#79
New York Times busted for anti-Bernie bias: The iconic, Clinton-endorsing newspaper slyly edits arti
Javaman
May 2016
#61
And when you come to DU, Trump is always in the pic of the day. That's different, you say? No.
whereisjustice
May 2016
#21
One can access any news source from anywhere in the US and in the world online
oberliner
May 2016
#42