Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Editorials & Other Articles

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Snarkoleptic

(5,997 posts)
Sat Apr 27, 2013, 09:30 AM Apr 2013

Austerity Economists Continue To Defend Discredited Study [View all]

Since they're not part of the fact-based community, this is about as surprising as saying "Duck continues to quack." IHMO

But not Carmen Reinhart and Kenneth Rogoff. Instead of admitting their failure, they have refused to admit their mistakes and instead tried to attack their critics. They dismiss both the mathematical error as important, and dismiss the revelation that the two economists cherry picked their data by selectively ignoring whole nations in order to achieve the results desired. They then pointed to a new paper to defend themselves, but a simple checking of their reference material reveals that their numbers in this new paper came from their original piece, the one which has been discredited. This takes their defense and effectively eliminates it.


http://www.addictinginfo.org/2013/04/27/refusing-to-admit-failure-austerity-economists-continue-to-defend-discredited-study/
22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
2 people, recking country economies and millions of RKP5637 Apr 2013 #1
It's the RW paradox don't you know... tex-wyo-dem Apr 2013 #20
Yep, truly a mix of denial, rationalization and delusions. No RKP5637 Apr 2013 #22
Tighten your belt! Newest Reality Apr 2013 #2
I can't help but consider their self-righteousness and refusal to admit the error Snarkoleptic Apr 2013 #3
1,065,794 homeless children enrolled in America’s preschools, kindergarten and grades 1 to 12 midnight Apr 2013 #7
They have nothing else, so they will stick with the well-paid bullshit. nt bemildred Apr 2013 #4
As you said... Snarkoleptic Apr 2013 #5
that's always why I give Rampton and Stauber books to my closest friends--not to "turn" them on any MisterP Apr 2013 #6
There's a lot of money behind that study and the attempts to defend it. drm604 Apr 2013 #8
Their 'defense' here: elleng Apr 2013 #9
They need to withdraw their paper from American Economic Review salib Apr 2013 #10
They should just come clean and admit it - Austerity is a religion n2doc Apr 2013 #11
Greed is the religion and austerity is an article of faith. IMHO Snarkoleptic Apr 2013 #12
. blkmusclmachine Apr 2013 #13
Stupidity, Cupidity,Incompetence and Arrogance PATRICK Apr 2013 #14
Low Moral Intelligence - good one! LMI? So Mr Cheney, you have an LMI of -16, Do you have byeya Apr 2013 #16
Seems like you were channeling Hunter S. Thompson there. Nice! Snarkoleptic Apr 2013 #17
Caught with their pants down: "Oh no, our pants are up; we have tenure" and byeya Apr 2013 #15
If any of us wrote a term paper wilt the stilt Apr 2013 #18
Yep, I never would have made it out of my 2 semesters in statistical analysis. n/t RKP5637 Apr 2013 #21
Just as predicted. AverageJoe90 Apr 2013 #19
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Austerity Economists Cont...»Reply #0