Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

moriah

(8,312 posts)
11. Has *any* article quoting them fresh, not using the 1997 article's quotes instead, actually said...
Sun Jan 8, 2012, 11:50 AM
Jan 2012

... that they induced? Have they ever said they induced?

Antibiotics are not abortive. Just like the whole Palin fiasco, they'll do enough damage without us making shit up for them.

The much better way is to address their quotes about what they would have done if they HAD to induce, if they had been told it was one hour left, as they said. Then present them with the fact that they went to a very expensive hospital to have their baby, a secular hospital that didn't decide to force another person's morality on them.

Fuck the "Protect Life Act", and I want him up on TV admitting that it's a terrible idea to give government funding to any hospital that doesn't present all appropriate medical options to their patients when there's only one life that can be protected!

Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Salon.com: Karen Santoru...»Reply #11