How G.M. Tricked Millions of Drivers Into Being Spied On (Including Me) [View all]
Automakers have been selling data about the driving behavior of millions of people to the insurance industry. In the case of General Motors, affected drivers werent informed, and the tracking led insurance companies to charge some of them more for premiums. Im the reporter who broke the story. I recently discovered that Im among the drivers who was spied on.
My husband and I bought a G.M.-manufactured 2023 Chevrolet Bolt in December. This month, my husband received his consumer disclosure files from LexisNexis Risk Solutions and Verisk, two data brokers that work with the insurance industry and that G.M. had been providing with data. (He requested the files after my article came out in March, heeding the advice I had given to readers.)
My husbands LexisNexis report had a breakdown of the 203 trips we had taken in the car since January, including the distance, the start and end times, and how often we hard-braked or accelerated rapidly. The Verisk report, which dated back to mid-December and recounted 297 trips, had a high-level summary at the top: 1,890.89 miles driven; 4,251 driving minutes; 170 hard-brake events; 24 rapid accelerations, and, on a positive note, zero speeding events.
I had requested my own LexisNexis file while reporting, but it didnt have driving data on it. Though both of our names are on the cars title, the data from our Bolt accrued to my husband alone because the G.M. dealership listed him as the primary owner.
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/23/technology/general-motors-spying-driver-data-consent.html?unlocked_article_code=1.mk0.xdII.n4wRfsowMaw-&smid=url-share