Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Editorials & Other Articles
Showing Original Post only (View all)On student loan forgiveness, conservative justices skeptical of Biden plan [View all]
COURTS & LAW
On student loan forgiveness, conservative justices skeptical of Biden plan
Roberts and others said Congress should be involved in such an expensive endeavor, and they questioned the plans fairness
By Robert Barnes, Danielle Douglas-Gabriel and Ann E. Marimow
Updated February 28, 2023 at 2:48 p.m. EST | Published February 28, 2023 at 2:27 p.m. EST
Conservative Supreme Court justices on Tuesday seemed highly skeptical that President Biden has authority from Congress to provide more than $400 billion in student loan forgiveness to borrowers as a result of the coronavirus pandemic.
Over more than three hours of argument in two cases, conservatives led by Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. questioned how what Roberts repeatedly called a half-trillion dollar program could be implemented without more direct involvement from Congress, which controls the purse of federal spending. ... The justices on the right seemed unsatisfied with assertions from their liberal colleagues and U.S. Solicitor General Elizabeth B. Prelogar that blocking the program would actually thwart the will of Congress, which provided for the secretary of education to act on student loan debt in times of emergency.
Liberal Justice Elena Kagan noted the court often faces difficulty in trying to understand Congresss intent in passing legislation. This one is not, she said, referring to the Higher Education Relief Opportunities for Students Act of 2003. She added, Congress doesnt get much clearer. ... Roberts said lawmakers should be involved in order for the Biden administration to launch such a broad program: I think most casual observers would say if youre going to give up that much amount of money, if youre going to affect the obligations of that many Americans on a subject thats of great controversy, they would think thats something for Congress to act on.
The courts conservative justices also expressed concern about the fairness of providing loan forgiveness to some and not to others. Roberts presented a hypothetical scenario involving two high school graduates one who takes out a loan to attend college and the other who gets a loan to start a lawn care business.
{snip}
The cases are Biden v. Nebraska and U.S. Department of Education v. Brown.
This is a developing story.
Gift Article
https://wapo.st/3KJSpn6
By Robert Barnes
Robert Barnes has been a Washington Post reporter and editor since 1987. He joined The Post to cover Maryland politics, and he has served in various editing positions, including metropolitan editor and national political editor. He has covered the Supreme Court since November 2006. Twitter https://twitter.com/scotusreporter
By Danielle Douglas-Gabriel
Danielle Douglas-Gabriel covers the economics of higher education, writing about the financial policies that determine a student's access to education and ability to complete a credential. Twitter https://twitter.com/DaniDougPost
By Ann Marimow
Ann Marimow covers legal affairs for The Washington Post. She joined The Post in 2005 and has covered state government and politics in California, New Hampshire and Maryland. Twitter https://twitter.com/amarimow
On student loan forgiveness, conservative justices skeptical of Biden plan
Roberts and others said Congress should be involved in such an expensive endeavor, and they questioned the plans fairness
By Robert Barnes, Danielle Douglas-Gabriel and Ann E. Marimow
Updated February 28, 2023 at 2:48 p.m. EST | Published February 28, 2023 at 2:27 p.m. EST
Conservative Supreme Court justices on Tuesday seemed highly skeptical that President Biden has authority from Congress to provide more than $400 billion in student loan forgiveness to borrowers as a result of the coronavirus pandemic.
Over more than three hours of argument in two cases, conservatives led by Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. questioned how what Roberts repeatedly called a half-trillion dollar program could be implemented without more direct involvement from Congress, which controls the purse of federal spending. ... The justices on the right seemed unsatisfied with assertions from their liberal colleagues and U.S. Solicitor General Elizabeth B. Prelogar that blocking the program would actually thwart the will of Congress, which provided for the secretary of education to act on student loan debt in times of emergency.
Liberal Justice Elena Kagan noted the court often faces difficulty in trying to understand Congresss intent in passing legislation. This one is not, she said, referring to the Higher Education Relief Opportunities for Students Act of 2003. She added, Congress doesnt get much clearer. ... Roberts said lawmakers should be involved in order for the Biden administration to launch such a broad program: I think most casual observers would say if youre going to give up that much amount of money, if youre going to affect the obligations of that many Americans on a subject thats of great controversy, they would think thats something for Congress to act on.
The courts conservative justices also expressed concern about the fairness of providing loan forgiveness to some and not to others. Roberts presented a hypothetical scenario involving two high school graduates one who takes out a loan to attend college and the other who gets a loan to start a lawn care business.
{snip}
The cases are Biden v. Nebraska and U.S. Department of Education v. Brown.
This is a developing story.
Gift Article
https://wapo.st/3KJSpn6
By Robert Barnes
Robert Barnes has been a Washington Post reporter and editor since 1987. He joined The Post to cover Maryland politics, and he has served in various editing positions, including metropolitan editor and national political editor. He has covered the Supreme Court since November 2006. Twitter https://twitter.com/scotusreporter
By Danielle Douglas-Gabriel
Danielle Douglas-Gabriel covers the economics of higher education, writing about the financial policies that determine a student's access to education and ability to complete a credential. Twitter https://twitter.com/DaniDougPost
By Ann Marimow
Ann Marimow covers legal affairs for The Washington Post. She joined The Post in 2005 and has covered state government and politics in California, New Hampshire and Maryland. Twitter https://twitter.com/amarimow
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 1124 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
On student loan forgiveness, conservative justices skeptical of Biden plan [View all]
mahatmakanejeeves
Feb 2023
OP
and for those critical of Biden for not forgiving more loan amounts, it is sad that there were not
JohnSJ
Feb 2023
#1
I wonder how they would've squared early recipients of social security receiving
Uncle Joe
Feb 2023
#2