Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

calimary

(81,238 posts)
30. Welcome to DU, lurch2!
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 01:13 PM
Oct 2014

Glad you're here! This makes me proud to be a Californian. We've gotta start SOMEWHERE with sensible gun restrictions. SOMEWHERE!!!!! I'm sure this will be fought, because the bad guys (and YES. I consider them bad guys. My opinion, but there you are) will fight ANYTHING along these lines that makes sense to the rest of us. I just hope it stands. I think we need more sensible gun restrictions and regulations. NOT fewer. Seems to me that we have the problems we do BECAUSE we don't have enough sensible gun restrictions and regulations on the books.

It's as good a law as each judge who makes a determination. NYC_SKP Oct 2014 #1
Yeah, I'll err on the side of the safety of a life or 2 or 6... Tikki Oct 2014 #2
Seems to me that drugs with the caution "do not operate machinery" is reason enough Hoyt Oct 2014 #3
The warning is "do not operate heavy machinery until you know the effects of this drug". NutmegYankee Oct 2014 #5
Heck, there are millions of supposedly responsible gun owners on drugs that alter judgement. Hoyt Oct 2014 #14
You don't understand responsibility. NutmegYankee Oct 2014 #46
Because, gunners won't do it. Millions of people on meds with gunz are a threat, Hoyt Oct 2014 #47
And none of your examples had to do with meds. NutmegYankee Oct 2014 #48
Sorry, but a very large percentage of those arming up are also racists, Bundy ranch militia Hoyt Oct 2014 #52
Statistics would demonstrate that to be false. NutmegYankee Oct 2014 #54
The majority of gun owners, particulary those who have more than a hunting rifle and Hoyt Oct 2014 #55
A gun store or show is hardly in the same category as a guns in public rally. NutmegYankee Oct 2014 #57
So what? beevul Oct 2014 #78
Hmmmm I was on a bunch of pain killers after a surgery... Adrahil Oct 2014 #65
If you were a responsible gun owner, you would have locked them up and given key to someone else. Hoyt Oct 2014 #67
I didn't need to. I'm not an idiot. I locked them up and didn't use them. Adrahil Oct 2014 #68
Sounds good. Hopefully, you'll find over time that you really don't need all those gunz. Good luck Hoyt Oct 2014 #69
Thanks much, I hope so too! Adrahil Oct 2014 #70
Oh, I can appreciate antiques. My dad had a few. Enjoyed selling some like a 1870s Evans Repeater, Hoyt Oct 2014 #74
Don't you know guns and beer are as American as,...well,...guns and whiskey? Spitfire of ATJ Oct 2014 #9
Do we presently take away their car keys? nt hack89 Oct 2014 #12
Old folks, yes. We should take guns from anyone on drugs that alter judgement. Hoyt Oct 2014 #15
Why do we let younger people on judgement altering drugs keep their car keys? nt hack89 Oct 2014 #16
I think you will find that drugs like Prozac, Paxil, muscle relaxants, sleep aids, etc., may impact Hoyt Oct 2014 #17
We were talking about "operating machinery" hack89 Oct 2014 #18
You have a greater chance of getting killed by some yahoo with a Carry Permit, than an airplane. Hoyt Oct 2014 #21
So driving cars while taking those drugs is perfectly safe? hack89 Oct 2014 #22
At same time we take their gunz, we should take their keys. Hoyt Oct 2014 #24
And we should take away the keys of people without guns, correct? hack89 Oct 2014 #27
Your interlocutor is avoiding the question... friendly_iconoclast Oct 2014 #34
He realizes what a ridiculous idea it is. hack89 Oct 2014 #35
And impose police state controls on OTC medications. NutmegYankee Oct 2014 #45
because your car keys aren't a car CreekDog Oct 2014 #40
So we disable their cars so they can't be driven. hack89 Oct 2014 #41
Got mighty quiet when called out and has no answer Duckhunter935 Oct 2014 #58
How about a mandatory big bouncy hamster ball for every human on earth... Oktober Oct 2014 #49
I wish we could convince gun nuts their fear of the boogeyman is irrational. Hoyt Oct 2014 #53
All the fear I hear about is coming from the anti-2nd side of the house... Oktober Oct 2014 #56
No, it's concern for the callous, often racist, bunch that are into gunz like the Bundy Hoyt Oct 2014 #59
Corner? Oktober Oct 2014 #62
Sorry, typo exacerbated by auto-correct. Hoyt Oct 2014 #63
Frankly, I don't think that's up to you. NT Adrahil Oct 2014 #66
Yeah but those don't effect ownershop of an aircraft.N/T beevul Oct 2014 #79
Out of curiosity lurch2 Oct 2014 #28
I am most concerned about folks like this carrying gunz while on such meds. Hoyt Oct 2014 #36
The Nugent One Is Classic hollowdweller Oct 2014 #37
+1. LMAO. And he's an NRA board member helping make policy. Hoyt Oct 2014 #38
You didn't answer the question lurch2 Oct 2014 #64
Showing off your segregated photo collection again, Hoyt? friendly_iconoclast Oct 2014 #75
Gun nuts are rather racist. Check out NRA board members, attendees at gun shows, gun stores, etc. Hoyt Oct 2014 #76
You seem not have noticed a common characteristic of the "gun nuts" I showed friendly_iconoclast Oct 2014 #77
My interlocutor seems to have gone missing. Imagine my surprise... friendly_iconoclast Oct 2014 #80
I posted about this earlier this evening. cui bono Oct 2014 #4
I wonder if someone will challenge it up to SCOTUS? Kablooie Oct 2014 #6
California makes headlines every day for liberal progress BrotherIvan Oct 2014 #7
Well, there's the old saying - "as California goes, so goes the nation." calimary Oct 2014 #29
We have not been living up to our potential BrotherIvan Oct 2014 #31
Gun nuts are gonna flip out,....thus proving they're nuts. Spitfire of ATJ Oct 2014 #8
You would be surprised beemer27 Oct 2014 #11
"If this law is used intelligently" Spitfire of ATJ Oct 2014 #23
This is a good response BrotherIvan Oct 2014 #32
I don't see anything wrong with it. hollowdweller Oct 2014 #39
Exactly BrotherIvan Oct 2014 #43
As long as there is due process, a chance to rebut, and a restoration process, I'm good. aikoaiko Oct 2014 #10
This, I think, is what the laws will look like when AB1014 goes into effect Jan 2016: petronius Oct 2014 #19
Looks like a reasonable law. nt hack89 Oct 2014 #13
a good bill for a change. samsingh Oct 2014 #20
Not a bad law lurch2 Oct 2014 #25
Welcome to DU, lurch2! calimary Oct 2014 #30
Even gun owners should have no problem with this. A protection order should disarm the offender. marble falls Oct 2014 #26
Even better BrotherIvan Oct 2014 #33
My concern on this is just like in divorces, someone makes claims Big_Mike Oct 2014 #42
I'm all for this madokie Oct 2014 #44
What is the confiscation process? Oktober Oct 2014 #50
Doesn't go far enough gopiscrap Oct 2014 #51
What's your idea of far enough? GGJohn Oct 2014 #60
Total gun ban gopiscrap Oct 2014 #71
Thanks for the welcome GGJohn Oct 2014 #72
Thank-You Governor Brown For Taking The First Step In Legislating Gun Control! Corey_Baker08 Oct 2014 #61
Is this constitutional? Ignoring the Second, How about the right of someone to be an adult? happyslug Oct 2014 #73
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Gov. Jerry Brown signs Ca...»Reply #30