Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Fri Apr 26, 2013, 08:16 PM Apr 2013

Syrian officials deny use of chemical weapons [View all]

Source: AP


The Assad regime insists that it wouldn't use such weapons even if it had access to them

BY ALBERT AJI

DAMASCUS, Syria (AP) — Two Syrian officials denied Friday that government forces had used chemical weapons against rebels, the first response from President Bashar Assad’s regime to U.S. assertions that it had deployed such weapons during the 2-year-old civil war.

On Thursday, the White House and other top Obama administration officials said that U.S. intelligence had concluded with “varying degrees of confidence” that the Syrian government has twice used chemical weapons in its battle against rebels trying to oust Assad.

In the Syrian capital of Damascus, a government official said Assad’s military “did not and will not use chemical weapons even if it had them.” Instead, he accused opposition forces of using them in a March attack on the village of Khan al-Assal outside of the northern city of Aleppo, the largest in Syria. The official said the Syrian army had no need to use chemical weapons because it can reach any area in Syria it wants without them.

He spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to give official statements.

Read more: http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/syrian_officials_deny_use_of_chemical_weapons_2_ap/

18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"varying degrees of confidence" cartach Apr 2013 #1
israel is doing surveillance for the US and others Mosby Apr 2013 #8
The case against Syria is very week, yet the war drums beat along the Potomac. Comrade Grumpy Apr 2013 #2
It makes absolutely ZERO sense for Assad to use chemical weapons. riderinthestorm Apr 2013 #3
Plus what's the military advantage even in the tactical sense? David__77 Apr 2013 #4
Oh, there is a military advantage in it demcoat Apr 2013 #5
I oppose US intervention regardless of use of chemical weapons. David__77 Apr 2013 #7
does the death toll concern you? Mosby Apr 2013 #10
Yes, and the US has played a negative role. We should give food and medical aid. David__77 Apr 2013 #11
What if the Syrian government has killed many times the number of Syrian civilians pampango Apr 2013 #13
Maybe we should just mind our own business. Comrade Grumpy Apr 2013 #15
I am all for minding our own business. But I am not for allowing dictators to kill their own people pampango Apr 2013 #17
We are involved in increasing the death toll. Comrade Grumpy Apr 2013 #14
What if chemical weapons were used on other Syrians rather than on an 'invading force'? pampango Apr 2013 #9
Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2013 #12
Because, as a wise poster above said, "... there is a military advantage in it." pampango Apr 2013 #16
Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2013 #18
But what if evidence indicated that our freedom-loving jihadists got their hands on some? arewenotdemo Apr 2013 #6
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Syrian officials deny use...