Latest Breaking News

mahina

(17,772 posts)

34. I thought that might be ambiguous. If I am not mistaken she is a Trump nominated judge.

Fri Feb 9, 2024, 06:36 PM

Feb 2024

Last edited Fri Feb 9, 2024, 07:13 PM - Edit history (1)

Of course you’re 100% right about who gets tagged for the job that TrumP did not select her to hear his case, but he did get her in office by nominating her, though she has very little experience. It’s my guess he did so because he thought he could control her but that’s just a guess. Maybe it was for some better reason, but I don’t think so.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

55 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

"Manifest injustice": Jack Smith calls out Judge Cannon's "clear error" in new filing [View all] BumRushDaShow Feb 2024 OP

I know she's a hack, but this should have been a no-brainer. TwilightZone Feb 2024 #1

NOTHING POSITIVE? LiberalLovinLug Feb 2024 #44

If Loose Cannon digs herself any deeper, Smith might get a higher court to move the case away from her. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Feb 2024 #2

I would think this would be enough. LiberalFighter Feb 2024 #10

I sure hope so! ShazzieB Feb 2024 #23

A considerable delay in that case. Probably what fuckface wants. Lucky Luciano Feb 2024 #42

Smith should iniate that process ASAP. n/t iluvtennis Feb 2024 #14

He may just be waiting for her response to this. ShazzieB Feb 2024 #24

Amen to that!! PortTack Feb 2024 #28

Yes, setting the groundwork to have her dismissed. ananda Feb 2024 #22

We can hope Rebl2 Feb 2024 #33

Expose this corrupt judge for what she is Mysterian Feb 2024 #3

You know what? Maybe Judge Cannon isn't corrupt... FakeNoose Feb 2024 #46

Lawyer Brigade incoming to tell us Cannon was right Prairie Gates Feb 2024 #4

Nope. We don't entertain trolls here. lastlib Feb 2024 #12

LOL Prairie Gates Feb 2024 #16

Not from me. TomSlick Feb 2024 #41

Wait... you know bmaz too? nt. druidity33 Feb 2024 #47

Member, I guess, of the "Lawyer Brigade" here. And while the motion to reconsider should be granted by Cannon onenote Feb 2024 #51

Aileen is following the Alien and seduction of Trump Act! GreenWave Feb 2024 #5

It's Very Hard for Me to Entertain the Idea That This "Own Goal" is Merely an Inadvertent Error The Roux Comes First Feb 2024 #6

Hope this is first step for bluestarone Feb 2024 #7

When does Smith edhopper Feb 2024 #8

I think he was reluctant to do this at first because of the delays drray23 Feb 2024 #31

He doesn't. Certainly not for this order. onenote Feb 2024 #50

Jack is finally stopping the coddling. Thank you, Jack. republianmushroom Feb 2024 #9

Coddling? lol! Torchlight Feb 2024 #17

I find it hard to believe that she was randomly chosen for this case. trusty elf Feb 2024 #11

I find it impossible to believe orangecrush Feb 2024 #13

No doubt she hopes the same mahina Feb 2024 #15

I dont thnk anyone "selected" her for this. ShazzieB Feb 2024 #26

I thought that might be ambiguous. If I am not mistaken she is a Trump nominated judge. mahina Feb 2024 #34

Yes, Cannon was definitely a Trump appointment. ShazzieB Feb 2024 #36

So, she is the mouthpiece, who is the brain, and the strategic planner. Some one or a team of someones..... usaf-vet Feb 2024 #45

I read at the time that there were only 2 judges it could be assigned to... AnrothElf Feb 2024 #18

True too. But Trump nominated her. She was confirmed in 2020. She had no judicial experience. mahina Feb 2024 #35

Question: Is Cannon the Judge EndlessWire Feb 2024 #19

Has she now become a co-conspirator to allowing Bluethroughu Feb 2024 #20

No, she applied the wrong legal standard in response to a motion when the opposition didn't cite the correct standard onenote Feb 2024 #52

Slobby would dox these witnesses immediately. rubbersole Feb 2024 #21

He already has this information. This is about whether the press and public at large should get it. onenote Feb 2024 #53

Delay, delay, delay, that's the name of the game Mr. Ected Feb 2024 #25

What is your evidence "DOJ is taking great pains" to keep her on it? Bernardo de La Paz Feb 2024 #40

Well don't you think she should have been removed earlier? Nobody can tell what is in someone's mind flying_wahini Feb 2024 #48

Yes, it is off base to say "don't you think that ..." is evidence of corruption Bernardo de La Paz Feb 2024 #49

"Judge Cannon" 3825-87867 Feb 2024 #27

Love to see Jack Smith find a way to put her in the unemployment line for good. KS Toronado Feb 2024 #29

If she is removed, could bluestarone Feb 2024 #30

yes of course. it would be reassigned to another judge.nt. drray23 Feb 2024 #32

Another judge would be assigned, however... Shipwack Feb 2024 #39

Kick dalton99a Feb 2024 #37

"That discovery material, if publicly docketed in unredacted form as the Court has ordered, ffr Feb 2024 #38

YAY.. Oh I wish he could Cha Feb 2024 #43

I have a bit of a problem figuring this woman out. madaboutharry Feb 2024 #54

Kick ck4829 Feb 2024 #55