Latest Breaking News

drray23

(7,638 posts)

32. yes of course. it would be reassigned to another judge.nt.

Reply to bluestarone (Reply #30)

Fri Feb 9, 2024, 05:27 PM

Feb 2024

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

55 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

"Manifest injustice": Jack Smith calls out Judge Cannon's "clear error" in new filing [View all] BumRushDaShow Feb 2024 OP

I know she's a hack, but this should have been a no-brainer. TwilightZone Feb 2024 #1

NOTHING POSITIVE? LiberalLovinLug Feb 2024 #44

If Loose Cannon digs herself any deeper, Smith might get a higher court to move the case away from her. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Feb 2024 #2

I would think this would be enough. LiberalFighter Feb 2024 #10

I sure hope so! ShazzieB Feb 2024 #23

A considerable delay in that case. Probably what fuckface wants. Lucky Luciano Feb 2024 #42

Smith should iniate that process ASAP. n/t iluvtennis Feb 2024 #14

He may just be waiting for her response to this. ShazzieB Feb 2024 #24

Amen to that!! PortTack Feb 2024 #28

Yes, setting the groundwork to have her dismissed. ananda Feb 2024 #22

We can hope Rebl2 Feb 2024 #33

Expose this corrupt judge for what she is Mysterian Feb 2024 #3

You know what? Maybe Judge Cannon isn't corrupt... FakeNoose Feb 2024 #46

Lawyer Brigade incoming to tell us Cannon was right Prairie Gates Feb 2024 #4

Nope. We don't entertain trolls here. lastlib Feb 2024 #12

LOL Prairie Gates Feb 2024 #16

Not from me. TomSlick Feb 2024 #41

Wait... you know bmaz too? nt. druidity33 Feb 2024 #47

Member, I guess, of the "Lawyer Brigade" here. And while the motion to reconsider should be granted by Cannon onenote Feb 2024 #51

Aileen is following the Alien and seduction of Trump Act! GreenWave Feb 2024 #5

It's Very Hard for Me to Entertain the Idea That This "Own Goal" is Merely an Inadvertent Error The Roux Comes First Feb 2024 #6

Hope this is first step for bluestarone Feb 2024 #7

When does Smith edhopper Feb 2024 #8

I think he was reluctant to do this at first because of the delays drray23 Feb 2024 #31

He doesn't. Certainly not for this order. onenote Feb 2024 #50

Jack is finally stopping the coddling. Thank you, Jack. republianmushroom Feb 2024 #9

Coddling? lol! Torchlight Feb 2024 #17

I find it hard to believe that she was randomly chosen for this case. trusty elf Feb 2024 #11

I find it impossible to believe orangecrush Feb 2024 #13

No doubt she hopes the same mahina Feb 2024 #15

I dont thnk anyone "selected" her for this. ShazzieB Feb 2024 #26

I thought that might be ambiguous. If I am not mistaken she is a Trump nominated judge. mahina Feb 2024 #34

Yes, Cannon was definitely a Trump appointment. ShazzieB Feb 2024 #36

So, she is the mouthpiece, who is the brain, and the strategic planner. Some one or a team of someones..... usaf-vet Feb 2024 #45

I read at the time that there were only 2 judges it could be assigned to... AnrothElf Feb 2024 #18

True too. But Trump nominated her. She was confirmed in 2020. She had no judicial experience. mahina Feb 2024 #35

Question: Is Cannon the Judge EndlessWire Feb 2024 #19

Has she now become a co-conspirator to allowing Bluethroughu Feb 2024 #20

No, she applied the wrong legal standard in response to a motion when the opposition didn't cite the correct standard onenote Feb 2024 #52

Slobby would dox these witnesses immediately. rubbersole Feb 2024 #21

He already has this information. This is about whether the press and public at large should get it. onenote Feb 2024 #53

Delay, delay, delay, that's the name of the game Mr. Ected Feb 2024 #25

What is your evidence "DOJ is taking great pains" to keep her on it? Bernardo de La Paz Feb 2024 #40

Well don't you think she should have been removed earlier? Nobody can tell what is in someone's mind flying_wahini Feb 2024 #48

Yes, it is off base to say "don't you think that ..." is evidence of corruption Bernardo de La Paz Feb 2024 #49

"Judge Cannon" 3825-87867 Feb 2024 #27

Love to see Jack Smith find a way to put her in the unemployment line for good. KS Toronado Feb 2024 #29

If she is removed, could bluestarone Feb 2024 #30

yes of course. it would be reassigned to another judge.nt. drray23 Feb 2024 #32

Another judge would be assigned, however... Shipwack Feb 2024 #39

Kick dalton99a Feb 2024 #37

"That discovery material, if publicly docketed in unredacted form as the Court has ordered, ffr Feb 2024 #38

YAY.. Oh I wish he could Cha Feb 2024 #43

I have a bit of a problem figuring this woman out. madaboutharry Feb 2024 #54

Kick ck4829 Feb 2024 #55