Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

UT_democrat

(143 posts)
146. Cool
Tue Sep 6, 2022, 01:15 PM
Sep 2022

I'm sure this is just all part of the 3-D chess game that is being played. Or... we have already jumped the shark and its all over but the shouting. Oh well, Just vote.

Here's the document. pnwmom Sep 2022 #1
NOT GOOD TigressDem Sep 2022 #19
I wish to believe that Garland anticipated this from a MAGAT judge and will take immediate in2herbs Sep 2022 #26
Yes yes and yes n/t Lulu KC Sep 2022 #73
We're in it now. Joinfortmill Sep 2022 #92
I seriously doubt he can. Or will try Evolve Dammit Sep 2022 #105
Not if there's a crime committed Novara Sep 2022 #29
Questions of attorney/client privilege are normally brought up during a trial or via pre-trial in2herbs Sep 2022 #80
This will blueknight73 Sep 2022 #109
And then on to the SCOTUS, where... Wednesdays Sep 2022 #113
We need to win in November and then expand SCOTUS NYC Liberal Sep 2022 #116
Do they really want to open it up to where VMA131Marine Sep 2022 #119
This current SCOTUS will twist themselves into a pretzel Wednesdays Sep 2022 #123
Theoretically, criminal evidence can't have privilege William Seger Sep 2022 #79
Rich crybaby little boys always get what they want. That's the American way Walleye Sep 2022 #2
Putin isn't a crybaby. gab13by13 Sep 2022 #11
That's pretty good. I forgot Putin appointed this judge Walleye Sep 2022 #27
I used to post on my local Magat web site, gab13by13 Sep 2022 #52
Yes the truth is like kryptonite to the Republican Party Walleye Sep 2022 #54
Review for "attorney-client and/or executive privilege" lostnfound Sep 2022 #3
The person who currently holds executive privilege is Joseph R. Biden. Lonestarblue Sep 2022 #35
Yes the DOJ can appeal. Either side was probably going to appeal and this, in effect, helps DJT kelly1mm Sep 2022 #69
Her opinion is pretty broad, and very bad for us. Calista241 Sep 2022 #134
This is the Big Lie for legally and successfully executed search warrants, thanks Judge Idiot bucolic_frolic Sep 2022 #4
Of course she did. Judge shopping. LoisB Sep 2022 #5
How peculiar for this judge to announce her decision on a holiday. n/t SoFloDenny Sep 2022 #14
I didn't think about that but you're right, that is odd. LoisB Sep 2022 #18
Actually, she announced her decision EndlessWire Sep 2022 #89
Is anyone surprised? More delay and more time for Republican's to message on the jalan48 Sep 2022 #6
Not surprised one iota. hamsterjill Sep 2022 #41
Yes, the longer the delay the more time for Republican's to propagandize. The outrage at jalan48 Sep 2022 #49
yep llashram Sep 2022 #86
It is nice to be able to hand-select your own judge from among your appointees. That Presidency Chainfire Sep 2022 #7
others have pointed out this was a random selection, but.... getagrip_already Sep 2022 #88
"It's good to be king!" Nasruddin Sep 2022 #97
The Next Thing kairos12 Sep 2022 #8
I agree, gab13by13 Sep 2022 #55
This message was self-deleted by its author Chainfire Sep 2022 #9
And tRump just keeps on winning. old guy Sep 2022 #10
No, he doesn't keep on winning, and he faces multiple investigations. CBHagman Sep 2022 #39
He may not be winning, but he is not in jail for his crimes. Ferrets are Cool Sep 2022 #62
Lucky for him he's not been treated like a Black man sellimg indiv cigs on corner SheltieLover Sep 2022 #66
Yes, that was a shame on our country. Joinfortmill Sep 2022 #95
Exacly msfiddlestix Sep 2022 #143
✔️ ✔️ ✔️ ✔️ ✔️ n/t msfiddlestix Sep 2022 #144
Hey Judge, Trump doesn't have "Executive Privilege" emulatorloo Sep 2022 #12
Even if he did, you can't claim executive privilege against the executive, rsdsharp Sep 2022 #68
Right, and DOJ carefully explained that to her in their filing. emulatorloo Sep 2022 #70
She's repaying her debt! atreides1 Sep 2022 #81
She owes them nothing, she is supposed to be impartial and uphold the law. emulatorloo Sep 2022 #84
Plenty of them did uphold the law atreides1 Sep 2022 #94
"The appointment may (will) slow the pace of the department's investigation." Botany Sep 2022 #13
A disappointing number of Democrats voted FOR her, or didn't vote at all. FoxNewsSucks Sep 2022 #112
So arrest him NOW. According to all reports there is enough evidence to arrest him on in2herbs Sep 2022 #15
No surprise yankee87 Sep 2022 #16
I'm thinking...so what? agingdem Sep 2022 #17
There was a former case in the USSC that Thomas was a decider on and he discussed in2herbs Sep 2022 #32
It will be tough to bring an indictment without evidence.... getagrip_already Sep 2022 #34
the DOJ has the evidence... agingdem Sep 2022 #75
but they can't present it to a gj or likely, in a court..... getagrip_already Sep 2022 #83
As of today, the order appointing the Special Master also precludes the DOJ from using those kelly1mm Sep 2022 #126
Garland will appeal and soon agingdem Sep 2022 #127
Yes, the DOJ will probably appeal and it will most likely go through the 11th Circuit (R leaning) kelly1mm Sep 2022 #131
Doesn't matter. Closing the barn door when the horse is in the next county. paleotn Sep 2022 #20
Tell that to our overseas intelligence agents, gab13by13 Sep 2022 #30
A quick stay and then slapped down on appeal, but regardless,.... paleotn Sep 2022 #37
I REALLY hope this isn't an open-ended thing packman Sep 2022 #21
Here we are at DU gab13by13 Sep 2022 #22
It's a failure of imagination all over again by these "experts." /nt spudspud Sep 2022 #98
About Judge Cannon Ponietz Sep 2022 #23
And who says crime doesn't pay! peppertree Sep 2022 #43
Lock the Special Master in a SCIF with a bottle of water Submariner Sep 2022 #24
"it is unlikely to affect any investigative decisions or the ultimate outcome of the probe." brooklynite Sep 2022 #25
Who is Eric Tucker? I never heard of him. Is he a Republican? gab13by13 Sep 2022 #51
That is only true if we win in 2024 dsc Sep 2022 #130
Expect this TrumpTweet in just a few days after the SM starts working jmowreader Sep 2022 #28
Yup. orangecrush Sep 2022 #38
Don't know what to think orangecrush Sep 2022 #31
I'm sure there Appeal is 90% done.... getagrip_already Sep 2022 #44
Trump appointed judge comes through for Trump. Gives him a massive delay in a criminal investigation Baitball Blogger Sep 2022 #33
2 Questions BlueIdaho Sep 2022 #36
Who appoints the special master people Sep 2022 #108
So the Trump appointed Judge will appoint a SM... BlueIdaho Sep 2022 #111
Meaningless. The DOJ has already looked at everything they took. oldsoftie Sep 2022 #40
She ordered the doj to stop using info to prosecute.... getagrip_already Sep 2022 #45
Nope. Novara Sep 2022 #50
isn't the grand jury an investigation forum? getagrip_already Sep 2022 #85
They can still search his other properties too VMA131Marine Sep 2022 #120
I'm hoping that, IF there was ever a time for a fast appeal (FINAL appeal) bluestarone Sep 2022 #42
Guys, this isn't for executive privilege - he doesn't have that. This is for ... Novara Sep 2022 #46
uhmm, no, she specifically said for EP...... getagrip_already Sep 2022 #93
Doesn't matter what this idiot judge SAID, executive privilege rests with the executive, Joe Biden Novara Sep 2022 #141
This ruling will be appealed LetMyPeopleVote Sep 2022 #47
She wants to advance as a judge in future R administrations and wouldn't Tadpole Raisin Sep 2022 #48
Fuck this shit. (nt) Paladin Sep 2022 #53
Well said, gab13by13 Sep 2022 #59
So outrageous, judge should be recused from case wildman76 Sep 2022 #56
Can a judge Traildogbob Sep 2022 #63
A Judge that was appointed AFTER TRUMP LOST Heather MC Sep 2022 #57
McConnell put her there as a safety valve Ponietz Sep 2022 #58
Mcconnell is worst than Trump. Heather MC Sep 2022 #61
Trump will have a hayday with this. Kablooie Sep 2022 #60
There is no such thing fof high level classified material SheltieLover Sep 2022 #64
indict him for obstruction now moonshinegnomie Sep 2022 #65
AGREED. Clearly an Obstruction of Justice case. Justice matters. Sep 2022 #99
Ami I correct in believing the affidavit request was ignored? Raven123 Sep 2022 #67
If he has personal documents intermingled ET Awful Sep 2022 #71
Ya think??!! WestMichRad Sep 2022 #87
She'll probably appoint Putin orangecrush Sep 2022 #72
has to be someone not connected to either party.... getagrip_already Sep 2022 #91
She's gonna pick the SM EndlessWire Sep 2022 #102
I'm sure Garland anticipated this orangecrush Sep 2022 #106
Well well well. colorado_ufo Sep 2022 #74
SSDD mn9driver Sep 2022 #76
Well that sucks! vlyons Sep 2022 #77
Popehat discusses the decision at length (well, for a Twitter account). mahatmakanejeeves Sep 2022 #78
Supreme Court Nasruddin Sep 2022 #96
Hey, I have an idea! orangecrush Sep 2022 #82
Doubling down every time is the only sensible strategy Ponietz Sep 2022 #100
I'm sure Garland anticipated this orangecrush Sep 2022 #104
+1. Just do it. dalton99a Sep 2022 #122
LOCK HER UP...........Judge Aileen Cannon KS Toronado Sep 2022 #90
I believe the proper spelling is Judge Aileen Qannon. nt SunSeeker Sep 2022 #133
Sorry my mistake, I'll do better next time. KS Toronado Sep 2022 #136
Corrupt judge lees1975 Sep 2022 #101
Very hard to prove though Polybius Sep 2022 #115
Appoint a special master to review her bank accounts and contacts on this case GreenWave Sep 2022 #103
This orangecrush Sep 2022 #107
"What. Is The Harm" DallasNE Sep 2022 #110
I've heard of thank-you notes. But THIS is ridiculous! calimary Sep 2022 #114
Fuck it arrest the asshole now! BlueJac Sep 2022 #117
Unfrickingbelieveable ificandream Sep 2022 #118
Look, the military, the CIA, the FBI and Garland will never allow a special master to look at all.. machoneman Sep 2022 #121
The SCOTUS: "Hold my beer!" Wednesdays Sep 2022 #124
The judge should clearly have recused herself from the case as she cstanleytech Sep 2022 #125
Nope. onenote Sep 2022 #147
Fine I will amend it and say in my opinion she should have recused herself from the case as her cstanleytech Sep 2022 #148
Trump will get a happy ending from this one dalton99a Sep 2022 #128
Does Hillary Clinton still have her security clearance? Bayard Sep 2022 #129
MAGAt intimidation of an ignorant judge appeared to work, in this case n/t AntiFascist Sep 2022 #132
No intimidation. She is MAGA Trash herself JI7 Sep 2022 #137
She is also a pure IDIOT! This is the idiocracy many of us were concerned about... AntiFascist Sep 2022 #139
Delay, then claim "deep state special master" 867-5309. Sep 2022 #135
Judge Aileen Cannon is a member of the Taint Team. LudwigPastorius Sep 2022 #138
We need another judge to look at this. truthisfreedom Sep 2022 #140
And he slithers away again. zanana1 Sep 2022 #142
Copied from someone many months ago. "The Judiciary branch is strong and will hold." spike jones Sep 2022 #145
Cool UT_democrat Sep 2022 #146
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judge grants Trump bid fo...»Reply #146