Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

CHIMO

(9,223 posts)
Tue Jan 17, 2012, 09:50 PM Jan 2012

Journalist Chris Hedges Sues Obama Admin over Indefinite Detention of U.S. Citizens Approved in NDAA [View all]

Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Chris Hedges has filed suit against President Obama and Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta to challenge the legality of the National Defense Authorization Act, which includes controversial provisions authorizing the military to jail anyone it considers a terrorism suspect anywhere in the world, without charge or trial. Sections of the bill are written so broadly that critics say they could encompass journalists who report on terror-related issues, such as Hedges, for supporting enemy forces. "It’s clearly unconstitutional," Hedges says of the bill. "It is a huge and egregious assault against our democracy. It overturns over 200 years of law, which has kept the military out of domestic policing." We speak with Hedges, now a senior fellow at the Nation Institute and former New York Times foreign correspondent who was part of a team of reporters that was awarded the Pulitzer Prize in 2002 for the paper’s coverage of global terrorism. We are also joined by Hedges’ attorney Carl Mayer, who filed the litigation on his behalf in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.


http://www.democracynow.org/2012/1/17/journalist_chris_hedges_sues_obama_admin

36 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Good, let's hope it's found unconstitutional Ter Jan 2012 #1
+1000000000 nt Joe Shlabotnik Jan 2012 #5
Doesnt someone have to be harmed by the bill to get into the court system? rhett o rick Jan 2012 #19
Correct, a person MUST have "Standing" but in this case the Reporter clearly does happyslug Jan 2012 #21
Remember that the courts IMO fail miserably in both the Hamdi and Padilla cases. rhett o rick Jan 2012 #22
As I recall Roe in Constitutional Law, the reasoning wasn't that she might want an abortion in the 24601 Jan 2012 #23
Don't confuse the issue with actual law. Or facts. msanthrope Jan 2012 #26
But the point I was trying to make, was the Court COULD have avoided the case happyslug Jan 2012 #27
Wrong. He does not have standing. Read Lujan v. Defenders and get back to us. msanthrope Jan 2012 #24
I am talking the POLITICS of the Court happyslug Jan 2012 #28
So, you don't have the law, but are arguing politics? msanthrope Jan 2012 #29
If politics or conjecture don't come into play why did the SC give Bush standing Uncle Joe Jan 2012 #30
Because Mr. Bush claimed an actual, direct harm that could be redressed. msanthrope Jan 2012 #31
How could Bush be harmed in a disputed, two man, state run election, and Gore not be harmed by Uncle Joe Jan 2012 #32
None of the other issues you bring up have anything to do with msanthrope Jan 2012 #33
I understand you agree with the dissent, my only point is that De Facto by Uncle Joe Jan 2012 #34
So you want SCOTUS to find Hedges has standing for political reasons msanthrope Jan 2012 #35
It isn't a question of what I want, it's a question of what is. Uncle Joe Jan 2012 #36
War Powers Resolution EVDebs Jan 2012 #2
It is ilegal and they know it lovuian Jan 2012 #3
The constitutionality of a law is determined by the court system. rhett o rick Jan 2012 #20
Glad to hear it. tblue Jan 2012 #4
No need to worry, O is just playing 12 dimensional chess JJW Jan 2012 #6
This is badly timed. If the current right-wing SCOTUS finds it Constitutional, it will be very hard rhett o rick Jan 2012 #7
SCOTUS knows its ilegal too and if they vote lovuian Jan 2012 #8
The SCOTUS is acting well beyond their Constitutional duties. They are out of control. rhett o rick Jan 2012 #10
+1000 Wind Dancer Jan 2012 #25
What do you do when the supreme court becomes illegitimate? Mosaic Jan 2012 #9
Guillotines. nm rhett o rick Jan 2012 #11
This issue goes beyond right and left Ter Jan 2012 #17
So do you think the SCOTUS would rule against it? nm rhett o rick Jan 2012 #18
Reality check JJW Jan 2012 #12
How great would it be Iwillnevergiveup Jan 2012 #13
kr Norrin Radd Jan 2012 #14
So that's why the recent character assassination against Hedges has been occuring MNBrewer Jan 2012 #15
If someone commits a crime christx30 Jan 2012 #16
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Journalist Chris Hedges S...