Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Cha

(297,650 posts)
129. I say let them do their jobs.. this information started
Mon May 8, 2017, 01:45 AM
May 2017

in Vermont.

Vermont Public Radio:Officials: FBI Investigating Burlington College Land Deal Brokered By Jane O'Meara Sanders

The FBI is investigating a 2010 real estate deal that Jane O’Meara Sanders orchestrated as president of Burlington College, according to two former Burlington College officials.

The college closed in May 2016 when People’s United Bank refused to renew its line of credit, College President Carol Moore said when she announced the closure.

More..
http://digital.vpr.net/post/officials-fbi-investigating-burlington-college-land-deal-brokered-jane-omeara-sanders#stream/0

Vermont Digger:Emails reveal FBI, Justice probe of Burlington College

https://vtdigger.org/2017/04/27/emails-reveal-fbi-justice-probe-burlington-college/

7 Days Vermont..FBI Continues to Investigate Jane Sanders Burlington College Land Deal

https://www.sevendaysvt.com/OffMessage/archives/2017/04/28/fbi-continues-to-investigate-jane-sanders-burlington-college-land-deal

They deserve to know the truth.

Ruh-roh nycbos May 2017 #1
Do I believe she did this? Yes. A super big deal? No. Steven Maurer May 2017 #83
IF this is true, I'd like to see what she is accused of before I say it's not a big deal. Adrahil May 2017 #164
Fudging on a bank loan application is what the Trumps call Tuesday Steven Maurer May 2017 #200
Yeah, that's exactly right.... Adrahil May 2017 #203
Trump can't be the standard by which we judge ourselves, or anyone. SylviaD May 2017 #338
Fair enough, but what bout all the arguments how Hillary isnt responsible 4 the sins of her husband? InAbLuEsTaTe May 2017 #201
Bernie isn't responsible for what Jane does... Adrahil May 2017 #202
Most likely people promised more than they actually gave, Blue Meany May 2017 #211
From the articles I've seen on this topic the issue seems to be based on Ninsianna May 2017 #212
Misstatements on applications for loans from a federally insured institution are felonies Gothmog May 2017 #323
She got a couple hundred thousand, as i recall. Which was very generous coming from a college pnwmom May 2017 #258
I suspect that is it.... Adrahil May 2017 #336
Yes, the taxes would clear up many things. So why doesn't he release them? (nt) ehrnst May 2017 #335
Actually it is a big deal Gothmog May 2017 #230
If she lied on loan forms, and the info made the difference in getting the huge loan.... kstewart33 May 2017 #262
Ruh-roh indeed. nt SylviaD May 2017 #337
Seems like everyone BUT Hillary is under FBI investigation now. nt SunSeeker May 2017 #2
Ironic, isn't it? George II May 2017 #5
Indeed. SunSeeker May 2017 #6
Very interesting. sheshe2 May 2017 #7
Yes. Yes, indeed. NurseJackie May 2017 #156
Incredible! Cha May 2017 #21
Wasn't Chaffetz Still Whining About Hillary's E-mails Recently? TomCADem May 2017 #22
Yeah, well the FBI is no longer interested in Hillary. SunSeeker May 2017 #30
Didn't Comey Grant Him Immunity? DallasNE May 2017 #122
Chaffetz is in deep enough himself, he should just lay low. But it has already been established.... George II May 2017 #167
+1 nycbos May 2017 #29
lol For sure! treestar May 2017 #169
Yup obamanut2012 May 2017 #181
Really. (nt) ehrnst May 2017 #196
Bernie's a bigger threat nt Kimchijeon May 2017 #197
To whom exactly? And why would that affect an investigation into his wife's Ninsianna May 2017 #213
How so? Gothmog May 2017 #229
Right wing propaganda benpollard May 2017 #3
Wrong - it's been reported by several sources, and "The Hill" is a reputable blog/news site. George II May 2017 #4
Wrong. sheshe2 May 2017 #8
and VPR (Vermont NPR) pkdu May 2017 #16
NPR, who also references VTDigger and Seven Days, two reputable Vermont sources. Sheesh. George II May 2017 #18
Yikes! sheshe2 May 2017 #45
Yeah, the original sources weren't right wing, but DesertRat May 2017 #100
Thanks... sheshe2 May 2017 #31
The Hill source is a right wing rag angrychair May 2017 #36
Vermont Digger & Seven Days in Vermont have it.. Cha May 2017 #68
The original sources for the Daily Caller story lapucelle May 2017 #71
Cool angrychair May 2017 #116
Actually "we" are linking to reliable news sources lapucelle May 2017 #151
The original OP is not angrychair May 2017 #192
Look that the supporting material on this thead Gothmog May 2017 #232
And the Daily Caller used VPR, VT Digger, and Seven Days lapucelle May 2017 #243
Vermont Public Radio:Officials: FBI Investigating Burlington College Land Deal Brokered By Jane.. Cha May 2017 #72
I don't question the existence of an investigation angrychair May 2017 #120
This is the Original Source from May 2, 2017 Cha May 2017 #121
The original OP was not angrychair May 2017 #131
he got the news out there that orginated in Vermont Cha May 2017 #132
Hardly the actual point angrychair May 2017 #195
My point is.. Jane Sanders is being investigated for her Cha May 2017 #207
Great angrychair May 2017 #209
Yeah, you keep beating your covering it up drum. Cha May 2017 #210
Not covering it up angrychair May 2017 #263
Kick for more exposure Cha May 2017 #296
I don't think "snarky" means what you think it means. And what has the FBI to do with alleged "hurt WinkyDink May 2017 #264
Ok angrychair May 2017 #273
Yep. Good post. KTM May 2017 #302
You might want to recheck that, seems like rejecting stories we don't like is Ninsianna May 2017 #215
Oh, thats SOP around here for many. 7962 May 2017 #251
How about NPR....still right-wing? pkdu May 2017 #10
Hahaha.....never thought NPR would be considered "right wing", I've always heard them referred to... George II May 2017 #11
Apparently you missed today's fawning interview with Condoleezza Rice. JackRiddler May 2017 #246
Yes I did. Had I known of it I still would have missed it anyway. That woman has never said.... George II May 2017 #249
She is a war criminal. JackRiddler May 2017 #342
The NPR published the original article that the others quoted from. pnwmom May 2017 #17
Yes, May 2, 2017 Cha May 2017 #81
For what it's worth, VT Digger lapucelle May 2017 #24
Thank you for posting the links, lapucelle. sheshe2 May 2017 #34
VT Digger has many more links to archived stories lapucelle May 2017 #48
Mahalo, lapucelle.. Just because other news outlets Cha May 2017 #85
Thank you for that link . . . wish I'd seen it yesterday & the day before . . . Petrushka May 2017 #316
To be specific, it did angrychair May 2017 #52
Very unlikely. But they asked for the documentation months ago, and it still hasn't been provided. pnwmom May 2017 #65
+1 KTM May 2017 #67
Again.. Vermont Public Radio..May 2, 2017 Cha May 2017 #74
The Hill has updated it's article with more sources. To be specific, the post you're replying Ninsianna May 2017 #217
Great post! lapucelle May 2017 #244
Ok angrychair May 2017 #278
I'm sorry, but articles like this are current events reflecting on what's being said and what's Ninsianna May 2017 #281
Great links Gothmog May 2017 #233
See post #24 lapucelle May 2017 #28
Welcome to DU, benpollard calimary May 2017 #42
7 Days Vermont..FBI Continues to Investigate Jane Sanders Burlington College Land Deal Cha May 2017 #54
NO. Vermont Digger:Emails reveal FBI, Justice probe of Burlington College Cha May 2017 #59
Vermont Public Radio May 2, 2017 Cha May 2017 #77
That article has now been updated, with mulitple sources, so the propaganda Ninsianna May 2017 #214
Nope... lapucelle May 2017 #304
LOL!!!! Grassy Knoll May 2017 #9
LOL....care to explain? sheshe2 May 2017 #12
Not With The Chance Of Getting Deleted.. Grassy Knoll May 2017 #61
And, Team Cha.. Cha May 2017 #79
. Grassy Knoll May 2017 #88
********** Cha May 2017 #94
pssst, .... yuiyoshida May 2017 #180
Of course! Cha May 2017 #205
Mahalo! yuiyoshida May 2017 #208
Thanks. sheshe2 May 2017 #82
Not "here we go", but "there they (the FBI) went", starting about a year ago. George II May 2017 #14
Tucker Carlson MattP May 2017 #13
When was Tucker Carlson hired by NPR, VTDigger, or Seven Days? George II May 2017 #15
Tucker? sheshe2 May 2017 #25
Vermont Public Radio-May 2, 2017 had the Original Cha May 2017 #96
I'm glad that so many people who were cheering on his latest hire Ninsianna May 2017 #218
5th Rec.. thank you, Tom! Cha May 2017 #19
It probably happened with the lender's knowledge and approval, and possible urging Freethinker65 May 2017 #20
I guess that's why there's an investigation, don't you think? George II May 2017 #26
Yes. I never said she/it should not be investigated Freethinker65 May 2017 #32
No lender would have told her to report a million dollar bequest at some indefinite time pnwmom May 2017 #27
There will be an investigation Freethinker65 May 2017 #41
An investigation has been ongoing for months. And so far, no documentation of the gifts pnwmom May 2017 #53
I am not here to defend Ms. Sanders, nor anyone else at the university, nor the lenders Freethinker65 May 2017 #60
Lol. No lender would ever... Hassin Bin Sober May 2017 #55
+1 Freethinker65 May 2017 #62
I agree but it is very important to NOT mislead orientation to the FBI once the investigation starts grantcart May 2017 #75
When dealing in the convoluted realm of donations and pledges I doubt it will be possible to pin... Hassin Bin Sober May 2017 #92
That's why the "FBI is Investigating Jane Sanders for alleged Bank Fraud..".. it's Cha May 2017 #109
"...alleged Bank Fraud..."? "alleged"? Who alleged? And, for what reason? Petrushka May 2017 #158
The woman who was listed as being a donor of $1 million pnwmom May 2017 #165
That woman reportedly said a lot of things . . but . . . Petrushka May 2017 #188
She's not a lawyer and didn't use a legal term. She said that the documents contained pnwmom May 2017 #194
She isn't a lwayer & didn't use a legal term---but did she hire a lawyer & file a formal comlaiont? Petrushka May 2017 #275
NO! She is NOT the person who hired a lawyer and filed the complaint. pnwmom May 2017 #277
That woman denied the specific statements that Jane made to the bank. Ninsianna May 2017 #225
Did that woman file a formal complaint? Petrushka May 2017 #274
The woman who said she didn't donate a million dollars to Burlington pnwmom May 2017 #279
Understood. Petrushka May 2017 #282
With what entity would she need to file a formal complaint? Ninsianna May 2017 #284
Can't anser that question. However, the basis for the formal complaint was harm to . . . Petrushka May 2017 #285
Can you please show the link that points to the basis of the formal complaint? Ninsianna May 2017 #287
I was under the impression the Toensing lawsuit WAS the formal complaint. My bad! Petrushka May 2017 #289
No worries, it's an honest mistake. It's what I've been saying about the spin. Ninsianna May 2017 #310
From what I've been able to piece together, Toensing didn't file a lawsuit. He did file a complaint Petrushka May 2017 #314
I think what might be confusing you here is that you're looking for a lawsuit and plaintiffs. Ninsianna May 2017 #320
Yes, it is confusing me here because of your use of the word "lawsuit" in a number of posts. Petrushka May 2017 #326
I'm not sure what's confusing about pointing out that the Republican filed a lawsuit Ninsianna May 2017 #332
Thanks for clearing it up about the lawsuits---they're immaterial, now, to my confusion about . . . Petrushka May 2017 #340
Here's a link to the formal complaint itself. Sorry I didn't post it earlier. Petrushka May 2017 #329
Once again, this letter was posted in 2016, for an investigation that was already Ninsianna May 2017 #331
In your Post #330, you indicate there was a 2015 rumour that's now confirmed . . . . Petrushka May 2017 #334
lol "satan's work"? Just 'cause you don't like the report.. Cha May 2017 #204
What makes you think I didn't like the report? Petrushka May 2017 #271
Well, the donors who unequivocally state that their pledges were misrepresented for a start. Ninsianna May 2017 #220
Call me suspicious, but . . . Petrushka May 2017 #272
There have been other stories from local VT news sources that have been reporting on this Ninsianna May 2017 #280
Dang! I made a reply to your post and, for some unknown reason, it disappeared. I'll try again! Petrushka May 2017 #283
I understand the spin here due to the distasteful and opportunistic nature of the Ninsianna May 2017 #286
There seems to be more involved than Mrs. Sanders' involvement in the land deal. Petrushka May 2017 #288
The woman listed as giving $1 million insists that she never signed such a pledge pnwmom May 2017 #166
The deal took place in 2011, the financial world came apart at the seams in 2008 and.... George II May 2017 #175
But the college has still not been able to provide documentation about the $2.6mil in donations. pnwmom May 2017 #89
Lol. No, they were "give us a guesstimate on how much money you can raise" loans. Hassin Bin Sober May 2017 #101
If the bank did that, then they were complicit. But so was anyone else who signed pnwmom May 2017 #107
I'm sure you, Joe Degenova, his wife Victoria Toensing and her son, the complaint, Brady Toensing... Hassin Bin Sober May 2017 #113
None of those will get to the bottom of it, the FBI will get to the bottom of it. That's their job. George II May 2017 #176
Isn't it touching how shared hatreds QC May 2017 #184
It certainly brought the left and right together with Putin in their attacks against HRC. Ninsianna May 2017 #259
Your take on this issue is kinda, um, cattywampus. QC May 2017 #266
Is that a synonym for accurate, because if it's not, then you're wrong. Ninsianna May 2017 #269
You say "...random right wingers who started in AFTER the DOJ started investigating the issue " But Petrushka May 2017 #317
Well, that's a problematic thing to ask for, since DOJ doesn't announce their investigations. Ninsianna May 2017 #321
It wouldn't be problematic if you'd prefaced your assertion(s) with . . . Petrushka May 2017 #327
Well, that would have been a lie, and I like to be accurate and truthful. Ninsianna May 2017 #330
Yes, I "...asked for something from 2015, when it was a rumor, but it's been confirmed now,..." Petrushka May 2017 #333
The information they were given was a bit less vague and deliberately false. Ninsianna May 2017 #226
I dont think any of that matters pnwmom or atleast not unless there is an actual indictment cstanleytech May 2017 #70
That's true. She's innocent till proven guilty. But the fact that there are stories about this pnwmom May 2017 #90
Mahalo.. exactly, pnwmom Cha May 2017 #98
Ya assuming there is anything to get to as the FBI could decide that shes not guilty of anything cstanleytech May 2017 #106
Yes, that is still possible. nt pnwmom May 2017 #108
In all fairness, there were stories on Clinton's emails in these same sources karynnj May 2017 #216
I'm not sure I understand your point of view. All of this WAS known about Jane Sanders pnwmom May 2017 #234
Even now, there has been no confirmation that she will be charged with anything karynnj May 2017 #235
Jane Sanders didn't leave documentation for the loan pledges with the college, pnwmom May 2017 #236
The FOIA requests and the Congressional inquiries were done by the State Department karynnj May 2017 #238
Again, there was nothing for her to "leave" with the State Dept because she had nothing stored there pnwmom May 2017 #239
By leave, I meant that her team would give the work emails karynnj May 2017 #242
Again why are you trying to change the subject from an ongoing investigation pnwmom May 2017 #254
And for some reason, lapucelle May 2017 #247
Hypocrisy? The point is no charges have yet been made karynnj May 2017 #250
And the allegations against Hillary were made by a different group of Republicans, with agendas. pnwmom May 2017 #255
Because people like you claim what she did was not just karynnj May 2017 #260
This is nothing but regurgitated Republican swill. Hillary didn't stonewall. pnwmom May 2017 #265
Post removed Post removed May 2017 #267
Well at least we know of one person lapucelle May 2017 #245
We know of many who the FBI will not recommend charges karynnj May 2017 #248
Sure they would. In a heartbeat quakerboy May 2017 #146
She wasn't some inexperienced first-time homeowner being snookered into a no-doc loan. pnwmom May 2017 #150
The FBI would not be involved unless the bank complained Gothmog May 2017 #33
Thanks for the info, Gothmog. sheshe2 May 2017 #38
The bank didn't complain. That right wing ratfucker Toensing complained. Hassin Bin Sober May 2017 #80
The bank held the first mortgage so they didn't lose money. But the Catholic archdiocese pnwmom May 2017 #115
Lol. "One of their parishioners" named Wendy Wilton - former republican state rep and... Hassin Bin Sober May 2017 #125
Oh, right, because if only they were Democrats those parishioners would have been just fine pnwmom May 2017 #133
These are the people that still want to lock Hillary up. For real. Hassin Bin Sober May 2017 #134
Yup, they hate Democrats. That doesn't mean they'd be fine with their church pnwmom May 2017 #135
Yeah, I'm sure Victoria Toensing and Joe Degenova are looking out for the church. Hassin Bin Sober May 2017 #136
Well, IF anyone at Burlington College submitted false documents in trying to finance pnwmom May 2017 #137
These type of misstatements are serious issues Gothmog May 2017 #324
Not to change the subject, but . . . Petrushka May 2017 #159
It's hiding in the 2nd group of smilies after the ". . . " BUT pnwmom May 2017 #163
As the French say, QC May 2017 #173
There seems to have been a DOJ/FBI investigation before Toensing Ninsianna May 2017 #219
The FBI is totally corrupted. I am not a big Bernie Sanders fan but I am very skeptical StevieM May 2017 #117
Yep. The complaint was started by Brady Toensing son of Victoria Toensing. Hassin Bin Sober May 2017 #128
Please stop providing facts that only serve to continue confusing the issue! Petrushka May 2017 #161
Actually it appears that Mrs. Sanders lapucelle May 2017 #40
Yes. I have known about that since it was first reported back during the campaign Freethinker65 May 2017 #44
Apparently the investigation started about a year ago. George II May 2017 #46
Sounds about right. Freethinker65 May 2017 #50
Yes, but your comparison lapucelle May 2017 #63
Why is Jane Sanders being personally investigated instead of the College as a "Corporation"? mackdaddy May 2017 #190
That would be far less useful politically. QC May 2017 #253
We don't know that is true. pnwmom May 2017 #256
K&R Gothmog May 2017 #23
Burlington College donor said she never signed pledge. pnwmom May 2017 #35
Little known fact, a member of the Bove family ran for mayor the year Bernie won karynnj May 2017 #261
That will be an important fact in any investigation Gothmog May 2017 #325
I am pretty sure that the vast majority of FBI investigations go nowhere. Stonepounder May 2017 #37
True.. But in this case, pnwmom May 2017 #47
It would break my heart if it were true. Stonepounder May 2017 #56
Right. The RW will certainly use this, especially in VT, but it's still a legitimate story. n/t pnwmom May 2017 #57
If this is true, then I would ask this question: madaboutharry May 2017 #39
The VT papers have been reporting this for a year at least. But few seemed to care. nt pnwmom May 2017 #51
Great. Now can they get busy on investigating SERIAL CON MAN DONALD TRUMP FOR TREASON? n/t CousinIT May 2017 #43
I know! Our country is being run by traitors, and they're already dismantling healthcare. C Moon May 2017 #76
+1000000! SammyWinstonJack May 2017 #170
It did take 2 years to get to this point, and that's from a starting point of 5 years Ninsianna May 2017 #221
Has the FBI turned into a super agency? Its investigations in to the political arena has expanded.. bobGandolf May 2017 #49
But bank fraud would be a traditional area for the FBI to investigate, right? nt pnwmom May 2017 #58
Particularly if it involved the spouse of an elected member of the Senate. George II May 2017 #66
The FBI investigates violations of federal law, especially those involving possible fraud of $Ms George II May 2017 #64
If they investigated White Collar Crime, we'd see a lot more of those assholes in prison! C Moon May 2017 #78
I agree with you all on... bobGandolf May 2017 #102
Oh. I wasn't jumping to defend Jane Sanders... C Moon May 2017 #104
K&R Jamaal510 May 2017 #69
Post removed Post removed May 2017 #73
+ A-Schwarzenegger May 2017 #138
This message was self-deleted by its author Petrushka May 2017 #162
The Hill based this on a right wing source left-of-center2012 May 2017 #84
The Original Source was Vermont NPR from May 2, 2017.. Cha May 2017 #91
FWIW: The Vermont Public Radio headline isn't inflammatory while The Hill's is . . . Petrushka May 2017 #183
Jane Sanders' Bank Loan is Still Under Investigation Cha May 2017 #206
"Everything will be okay in the end. If it isn't okay, it isn't the end." --- Anonymous Petrushka May 2017 #318
KICK for more exposure.. Cha May 2017 #322
Is that a request? If so . . . Petrushka May 2017 #328
But the story has been covered by progressive VT outlets like the VT Digger and Seven Days, pnwmom May 2017 #93
The Daily Caller story linked to three reputable news sources, lapucelle May 2017 #95
Well, look on the bright side. Bleacher Creature May 2017 #86
Root cause: the trustees' eyes were bigger than their wallets jmowreader May 2017 #87
No, you've got the events out of order. They couldn't buy the land until they obtained pnwmom May 2017 #99
Post removed Post removed May 2017 #97
Oh gag yes! Cha May 2017 #110
Hey, Cha! lunamagica May 2017 #123
I love Hillary and am not a Sanders fan. But let's not forget how dishonest James Comey is. StevieM May 2017 #118
My point was Jane's attitude towards Hillary. Total contempt, acting like Hillary was guilty lunamagica May 2017 #124
+1 DesertRat May 2017 #186
We are multitasking. Cha May 2017 #126
I think he might have felt boxed into a corner with Guiliani's leaks in October, pnwmom May 2017 #268
You're all getting distracted nbsmom May 2017 #103
We can multi-task. Cha May 2017 #105
Ha! DavidDvorkin May 2017 #111
Snap! Great response, Cha! lunamagica May 2017 #127
Gracias, lunamagica! Cha May 2017 #130
Let's add fuel to this fire. hay rick May 2017 #112
Oh would you rather the report be kept hidden? Cha May 2017 #114
I'm not a big Bernie fan but I don't take this seriously at all. StevieM May 2017 #119
I say let them do their jobs.. this information started Cha May 2017 #129
OTOH, this would be over if the college would just produce the documentation pnwmom May 2017 #144
+ A-Schwarzenegger May 2017 #139
#FeelTheFraud Goprox May 2017 #140
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2017 #141
And of course we trust that Comey has our best interests at heart quakerboy May 2017 #142
Comey hasn't been discussing this case. A Republican politico in Vermont has been pushing pnwmom May 2017 #145
Thus missing the point entirely quakerboy May 2017 #147
What is your evidence for saying Comey released information to the Rethug who's pushing this case? pnwmom May 2017 #148
It's really very simple. QC May 2017 #189
+ Petrushka May 2017 #319
Everybody should look up the source of this complaint. klook May 2017 #143
And here is something else to consider. pnwmom May 2017 #149
Are you trying to suggest that the bishop might know more about his diocese QC May 2017 #252
This seems so politically motivated. delisen May 2017 #152
Isn't it possible both that the Republicans in that state are pursuing this case pnwmom May 2017 #154
Agree it is possible there might be something there.If so, it is delisen May 2017 #172
Is this so important that it has to be reposted half a dozen times in aout 24 hours? mikehiggins May 2017 #153
I just looked through 4 pages of GD and didn't see any other OP's about this. n/t pnwmom May 2017 #155
+ A-Schwarzenegger May 2017 #157
I don't see slamming of Senator Sanders here. BTW, picking one's nose isn't... George II May 2017 #171
From the link WellDarn May 2017 #160
Innocent until proven guilty NobodyHere May 2017 #168
This thread reminds me of JPR in reverse Tom Rinaldo May 2017 #174
+ A-Schwarzenegger May 2017 #177
It is being investigated. Ninsianna May 2017 #222
As Bill Clinton used to say .."that dog dont hunt anymore" INdemo May 2017 #178
You're entitled to your own opinion, but.... lapucelle May 2017 #307
Good and about time obamanut2012 May 2017 #179
It takes a long time for these investigations Beakybird May 2017 #182
Daily Caller? GeorgeGist May 2017 #185
Politics does play a part in this. That Guy 888 May 2017 #187
You'd think that would give some pause- glass houses and all that. bettyellen May 2017 #276
Oh, of course, anything to try and destroy Bernie Kimchijeon May 2017 #191
The Rethugs attacked Hillary the same way as the Rethugs in VT pnwmom May 2017 #241
Mrs. Sanders isn't running for anything that I am aware of... Trial_By_Fire May 2017 #193
Yes, agreed. Welcome to DU, anyway, TBF! JudyM May 2017 #231
Post removed Post removed May 2017 #198
I think you're kidding yourself on that one FakeNoose May 2017 #199
Actually, and more importantly, I suspect that Bernie Sanders or Martin O'Malley would also StevieM May 2017 #223
Exactly. It's LUDICROUS for any Bernie supporter to essentially claim that Putin would have pnwmom May 2017 #240
Actually, it's the blind jingoism of those who bought Bernie's message, and whom he couldn't Ninsianna May 2017 #224
Post removed Post removed May 2017 #227
This may be the explanation Gothmog May 2017 #228
Gotta laugh at all the Sanders' haters... Trial_By_Fire May 2017 #237
The FBI has been interviewing a number of other people connected with the loan, pnwmom May 2017 #257
LOL NurseJackie May 2017 #291
Very insightful Trial_By_Fire May 2017 #294
Why do you characterize those commenting on this investigation as "Sanders' haters"? George II May 2017 #293
I have yet to see any *actual proof* that Mrs. Sanders is under investigation... Trial_By_Fire May 2017 #300
You didn't read through the article. In it is reference to VTDigger.com which has been told.... George II May 2017 #303
So it's looking like the cleanest candidate was Clinton. ucrdem May 2017 #270
And Senator Sanders of course... Trial_By_Fire May 2017 #297
The Clintons released their 2015 tax returns. ucrdem May 2017 #298
So? Trial_By_Fire May 2017 #299
So the cleanest candidate was Clinton. nt ucrdem May 2017 #301
Senator Sanders is not nor ever has been under FBI investigation... Trial_By_Fire May 2017 #305
There's really no way to know that without an FOIA inquiry, and even then. ucrdem May 2017 #306
How do you know that anyone is not lapucelle May 2017 #313
No one can ever say that about anyone, since the FBI only very rarely makes that info public. pnwmom May 2017 #339
Then why are there even posts on Jane Sanders regarding a FBI investigation? Trial_By_Fire May 2017 #341
Sanders should get in front of this now lapucelle May 2017 #308
In front of what? Trial_By_Fire May 2017 #309
In front of a damaging narrative lapucelle May 2017 #311
I wonder how the firing of Comey might affect this investigation? George II May 2017 #290
I hadn't thought of that. You ask a fair question that ought to be answered. NurseJackie May 2017 #292
Kick! Cha May 2017 #295
K&R Scurrilous May 2017 #312
This message was self-deleted by its author Petrushka May 2017 #315
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»FBI investigating Jane Sa...»Reply #129