Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: More Clinton emails released, including some she deleted [View all]RiverNoord
(1,150 posts)It's another to make a blanket statement like that about the conduct of the candidate.
I do care about what a mess that was. I'm both a lawyer and an IT professional, and I really can't get over how bizarre it is that a United States Secretary of State funneled all of her official email through an email server maintained on her own personal property. With very crappy encryption.
It's basically the same as an ambassador 20 years ago bringing a hard copy of every single fax and cable sent to the embassy during that ambassador's tenure. And making sure everyone knew. And then, later, when the Embassy demanded it all back, the ambassador burned about a third of it because the ambassador decided it was personal and not official.
If people like you declare, loudly, an active disinterest in anything having to do with such a subject, how do you suppose Trump fanatics will regard his very, very substantial problems of just about every kind? Reasonable scrutiny or treatment of all criticism as unwarranted and cheap attacks?
Why elect people to high public office without demanding they address substantive concerns about prior conduct, especially conduct from a prior period of holding high office? We might as well just hold lotteries and select officeholders at random...