Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Emails in Clinton Probe Dealt With Planned Drone Strikes [View all]Mohammed_Lee
(38 posts)3. right wing trash n/t
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
215 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
How is this Right Wing......Are you trying to say that any evidnce that Hillary is corrupt is a
DemMomma4Sanders
Jun 2016
#4
It absolutely shows corruption, not on a scale of the clinton foundations foreign donations from
DemMomma4Sanders
Jun 2016
#15
they didnt need a deal, we had a base therebefore Obama pulled out of Iraq and Saudis
swhisper1
Jun 2016
#194
I prefer to filter out the "facts" that don't suit me at the moment, its less stressful....n/t
Mohammed_Lee
Jun 2016
#10
Former Colombian President Alvaro Uribe is on the News Corp Board of Directors.
OnyxCollie
Jun 2016
#119
Classified info floats all over everyday. 1.4 million of us have TOP security clearance out of
ancianita
Jun 2016
#171
the fact that this was reported right after Obama endorsed Hillary is strange
tomm2thumbs
Jun 2016
#5
The Wall Street Journal is owned by the same man who owns FOX, Ruppert Murdoch.
Trust Buster
Jun 2016
#6
Dark ? DU is a community that supports Democratic causes. Hillary is our nominee and, therefore,
Trust Buster
Jun 2016
#33
You only wish to bash our nominee because your candidate did not win. You are fooling only
Trust Buster
Jun 2016
#39
Trump is not the one pushing this stuff on DU. Did I really have to point the obvious out ?
Trust Buster
Jun 2016
#61
Oh jeesh....counterproductive. Are you saying i should be happy to see her buddy buddying up with
DemMomma4Sanders
Jun 2016
#22
The nomination has been decided. It's not about you. It's about our nominee. Time to grow up.
Trust Buster
Jun 2016
#23
There's that "me, me, me" again. DU is a "community" that supports Democratic causes.
Trust Buster
Jun 2016
#29
No, he did not win the nomination. The Democratic voters chose Hillary to represent our cause.
Trust Buster
Jun 2016
#41
Oh so now its not a community, it takes its dictate from the DNC no matter how its membership feels?
DemMomma4Sanders
Jun 2016
#42
You'll have to find someone else to carry on this nonproductive back and forth.
Trust Buster
Jun 2016
#43
I'm good. Actually great...because one thing everyone learned from this cycle
DemMomma4Sanders
Jun 2016
#45
Why would i get over my "bitterness" until I'm treated more fairly by politicians who eat my tax
DemMomma4Sanders
Jun 2016
#47
No, it's been decided. That's why the President, Senator Warren and Governor O'malley officially
Trust Buster
Jun 2016
#36
if she was the nominee, there would be no superdelegates, no convention, no reason for any of it
tomm2thumbs
Jun 2016
#73
The Democrats I know outnumber the Deocrats that you know. And that's why Hillary is our nominee
Trust Buster
Jun 2016
#68
So it should be easy to refute what the article said. Wait, no let's attack the source.
rhett o rick
Jun 2016
#16
What you are doing is called making a Strawman then tearing it down. No one accused or said Hillary
rhett o rick
Jun 2016
#20
No shit!.. Yes, I added a quote from the article that the OP neglected to include.
beastie boy
Jun 2016
#208
Yahoo.com is reprinting the WSJ article and giving WSJ full credit for it.
beastie boy
Jun 2016
#210
So they were unclassified as per a secret arrangement with the State Department and the CIA
Laser102
Jun 2016
#18
"sent via the “low side’’—government slang for a computer system for unclassified matters"
geek tragedy
Jun 2016
#25
That's an important point. She didn't just receive classified info on an unsecure server, she also
leveymg
Jun 2016
#130
Responsible for "vaguely stated" emails which "did not mention "CIA," "drones" or details about
beastie boy
Jun 2016
#100
The operative words in your post are "Some of those emails were not top secret when she got them but
2cannan
Jun 2016
#121
This is what Factcheck.org said the State Dept. report said about classified emails on Clinton's
2cannan
Jun 2016
#147
There are 3 systems: DOS NIPR email, Secure SIPR (to Secret), and Interagency JWICS (to TS/SAP)
leveymg
Jun 2016
#136
No. Saying that after-hours, she knowingly used only a nonsecure private system to send messages to
leveymg
Jun 2016
#193
No. She refused to touch a keyboard. She never directly accessessed the Secure SIPR.
leveymg
Jun 2016
#132
"These would be the ones provided/briefed B5" "Can they be secure faxed?" "Portions are classified"
leveymg
Jun 2016
#205
You didn't provide a link to your claim. I googled and only link was Fox news and a few RW Bloggers.
Fla Dem
Jun 2016
#175
Except that the Secretary of State receives the PDB Monday - Saturday and at least 50% of that comes
24601
Jun 2016
#103
You know, I thought I had read that before! Thank you Gothmog. It wasn't a senior moment. LOL
Laser102
Jun 2016
#67
You have to read the statutes to understand that intent is not a requirement for 18 USC 793(f).
leveymg
Jun 2016
#126
Yep. Transmiting "some emails" "which did not mention the "CIA," "drones" or details about
beastie boy
Jun 2016
#109
She was aware that her Blackberry and server were uncertified for classified info.
leveymg
Jun 2016
#137
These emails expose the USG decision-making process involved in targeted killings using drones
leveymg
Jun 2016
#128
If the emails contained discussions among US officials about targeted kills, they're classified.
leveymg
Jun 2016
#148
Once again, the emails in question DO NOT contain discussion about targeted kills.
beastie boy
Jun 2016
#151
Yes, we already know this. These have been discussed before. They are the emails that were also
OKNancy
Jun 2016
#117
