Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

EdwardBernays

(3,343 posts)
127. way to undermine national security obama...
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 11:51 AM
Apr 2016

and through an active investigation under the bus, for purely political reasons...

pretty disgusting behavior...

and ironic that by vouching for her not damaging national security he has...

Would he testify to that under oath? dchill Apr 2016 #1
I think you might be reaching just a bit there due to being biased towards Hillary. cstanleytech Apr 2016 #4
I don't see how you got there. dchill Apr 2016 #6
It was purely based on the tone of your post but like I said if you are not biased cstanleytech Apr 2016 #10
I am a 100% Bernie Sanders supporter. dchill Apr 2016 #55
Nothing wrong with being a Bernie supporter, I think both Hillary and Bernie would be cstanleytech Apr 2016 #58
I prefer to have the FBI and Justice Department come to that conclusion. Mr. Obama has a bias here. roguevalley Apr 2016 #45
No, I'm not refering to the investigation by the FBI and the DOJ. They will find whatever cstanleytech Apr 2016 #57
Well, here's the deal with Obama's opinion CoffeeCat Apr 2016 #128
So you know more about this that President Obama? George II Apr 2016 #71
Unspoken context: the felony statute Sec 793 doesn't require intent or actual jeopardy leveymg Apr 2016 #79
You're assuming quite a bit. Do you have any idea of what the FBI is really investigating? George II Apr 2016 #83
clues? links? anything? leveymg Apr 2016 #99
Well, you're the one who cited "felony statute Sec 793", so figured you knew. George II Apr 2016 #100
I only know the law and a bit of history. That tells me leveymg Apr 2016 #101
Pardoned? murielm99 Apr 2016 #110
You don't have to be charged and convicted to be pardoned. You're confusing leveymg Apr 2016 #112
You are confused. murielm99 Apr 2016 #133
Obama characterized it as an "investigation" the other day. For many months, it has been referenced leveymg Apr 2016 #134
Google is your friend. murielm99 Apr 2016 #136
Evidently. Don't you? dchill Apr 2016 #107
Mr. President Please Explain How Hillary Merits Your Comment As Being "Outstanding" As... notadmblnd Apr 2016 #2
Obama stands behind fracking Cassiopeia Apr 2016 #26
You fell for his trap. He has you talking about hughee99 Apr 2016 #150
Perfect chance for a two-fer! yallerdawg Apr 2016 #3
These are not Democrats here Gman Apr 2016 #20
Correct. But rather than nihilists... ConservativeDemocrat Apr 2016 #47
Best comment ever concerning the... keylargo Apr 2016 #115
Nihilist fits. creon Apr 2016 #61
Double your pleasure, double you fun! LOL! Surya Gayatri Apr 2016 #85
This is becoming right-wing underground I swear titaniumsalute Apr 2016 #5
Are you suggesting that news stories from outlets as Reuters should not be posted if you don't agree still_one Apr 2016 #11
I was responding to post #3. Not your OP. There's your perspective. titaniumsalute Apr 2016 #64
no problem, however your post indicated you were responding to me still_one Apr 2016 #68
yup. Oops. titaniumsalute Apr 2016 #89
i have done it also, no biggie still_one Apr 2016 #95
It is, isn't it. leftyladyfrommo Apr 2016 #65
However Obama said she was careless and didn't "Intentionally" put America in jeopardy Autumn Apr 2016 #7
if she didn't jeopardize national security... tk2kewl Apr 2016 #16
K&R. nt UtahLib Apr 2016 #8
Hear ye, hear ye. The Revolution's kangaroo court is now in session. LuvLoogie Apr 2016 #9
And here I thought DU was a place to comment and discuss stories of political import. FailureToCommunicate Apr 2016 #15
Of course, whether or not national security was jeopardized... thesquanderer Apr 2016 #12
Nice of the President to comment on an ongoing FBI investigation. OnyxCollie Apr 2016 #13
Post removed Post removed Apr 2016 #14
Why does he need to shut up? leftofcool Apr 2016 #17
Because he isn't entitled to an opinion if it doesn't agree with some of the group-think here still_one Apr 2016 #18
Why does he need to shut up? AlbertCat Apr 2016 #25
Under the bus goes Obama! NastyRiffraff Apr 2016 #28
Actually he should be quiet. rtw Apr 2016 #34
Actually do you have anything to support your implication of a criminal investigstion? Cary Apr 2016 #46
How 'bout the FBI? OnyxCollie Apr 2016 #51
Do I know the law? Cary Apr 2016 #63
Since you claim to know the law, OnyxCollie Apr 2016 #67
They don't announce these things so your "conservative" sources are garbage. Cary Apr 2016 #103
You got nothing. OnyxCollie Apr 2016 #108
But off course that was my point Cary Apr 2016 #119
Why are you responding? OnyxCollie Apr 2016 #121
Ah yes, the ad hominem Cary Apr 2016 #122
"My mind is..." OnyxCollie Apr 2016 #123
You are clearly mouthing "conservative" disinformation Cary Apr 2016 #125
And you're spinning. OnyxCollie Apr 2016 #126
Absolutely none of that supports your claim that she, personally, is under investigation Cary Apr 2016 #130
If you say so, it must be true! OnyxCollie Apr 2016 #131
It has nothing whatsoever to do with what I say. Cary Apr 2016 #132
The company you keep Cary Apr 2016 #135
Hear, hear! Thanks for speaking to truth, Cary. Hortensis Apr 2016 #137
Thanks Hortensis Cary Apr 2016 #138
It is extremists' usual fate to be sidelined because Hortensis Apr 2016 #146
The FBI is making no secret of their involvement here. NT rtw Apr 2016 #53
Plenty of good people under that bus Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Apr 2016 #37
They've begun using this one now! LOL! Surya Gayatri Apr 2016 #86
I'm a Bernie supporter, but, seriously. RiverNoord Apr 2016 #35
President Obama gets leeway on several counts. gordianot Apr 2016 #59
Nice summary. RiverNoord Apr 2016 #69
Why not? Cary Apr 2016 #140
Tell that to Don Siegelman. gordianot Apr 2016 #141
So you're claiming that the same thing will happen to Hillary Clinton Cary Apr 2016 #142
Of course not, but sometimes those B.S. right wing conspiracies bite. gordianot Apr 2016 #143
I make a distinction between a frame up and a smear job Cary Apr 2016 #144
Tell that to Bill Clinton and his intern. gordianot Apr 2016 #145
He wasn't framed Cary Apr 2016 #148
He lied always not a good choice. gordianot Apr 2016 #149
Obviously saying 'shut up' TM99 Apr 2016 #84
He wasn't speaking out on an ongoing investigation. beastie boy Apr 2016 #93
WTF? TM99 Apr 2016 #94
One more time, please beastie boy Apr 2016 #104
Um... actually, that's incorrect. RiverNoord Apr 2016 #109
You're right, I concede beastie boy Apr 2016 #120
No need to 'concede' :-) RiverNoord Apr 2016 #124
It's nice to see a Sanders' supporter being reasonable Cary Apr 2016 #139
Okay Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Apr 2016 #36
How does he know? tabasco Apr 2016 #19
The investigation is into whether a crime has even been committed, and if so, by whom. beastie boy Apr 2016 #87
K&R mcar Apr 2016 #21
Republicans consider Obama to be a threat to national security. Spitfire of ATJ Apr 2016 #22
Obama, in an interview broadcast on Fox News Sunday... mr clean Apr 2016 #23
And...? mcar Apr 2016 #24
your point?? riversedge Apr 2016 #105
Where in the article you referenced does it say that her email server didn't jeopardize security? revbones Apr 2016 #27
This is LBN, where the subject line MUST match the article title. To wit.... Hekate Apr 2016 #70
Thanks for replying so nicely. Really shows the positivity of the Hillary followers. revbones Apr 2016 #72
The President is correct again. He knows it's just about politics. I don't care about emails. Trust Buster Apr 2016 #29
Just about everyone in IT who works with email servers does. RiverNoord Apr 2016 #41
Why wasn't it a problem with Powell and Rice? treestar Apr 2016 #117
It is a problem with them also. It suggests a very sloppy attitude toward email security in RiverNoord Apr 2016 #129
As far as he knows nichomachus Apr 2016 #30
Obama is all in for Clinton because he wants to make sure his INdemo Apr 2016 #31
Yes shenmue Apr 2016 #32
This is somebody who has served his country for decades in the military, and Schema Thing Apr 2016 #33
What else would we expect from the man that backs DWS in her Congressional race? jalan48 Apr 2016 #38
What in the hell do you *expect* him to say? bvf Apr 2016 #39
As I predicted, He has to go all in for her Hydra Apr 2016 #42
Yep. Talk about your millstones. n/t bvf Apr 2016 #62
wonder why he is feeling the need to say anything at all. Hiraeth Apr 2016 #40
New York, aka Waterloo Hydra Apr 2016 #43
Love me some Obama but ... I can't wait for NY !!! Hiraeth Apr 2016 #44
pretty much expecting an even split . So PatrynXX Apr 2016 #49
makes for an interesting convention. Hiraeth Apr 2016 #50
Obligatory saving face move. Lars39 Apr 2016 #106
Right. and I'm the Easter Bunny PatrynXX Apr 2016 #48
Yeah... it's not like President Obama knows Bradical79 Apr 2016 #56
This message was self-deleted by its author Vilis Veritas Apr 2016 #52
I often wonder what's to secure that people should be so concerned... tenderfoot Apr 2016 #54
PBO is correct. creon Apr 2016 #60
Only the 'Not Hillary' Party and Republicans care about this. onehandle Apr 2016 #66
Actually, it did. But not in the way the right wingers and Sandernistas will have you believe. beastie boy Apr 2016 #73
REC. and Thank you. riversedge Apr 2016 #74
Enormous K & R. Surya Gayatri Apr 2016 #75
K&R rock Apr 2016 #76
K&R liberal N proud Apr 2016 #77
K&R ismnotwasm Apr 2016 #78
Kick fleabiscuit Apr 2016 #80
Never thought I'd see some Democrats become allies with right wing Kingofalldems Apr 2016 #81
You can see it here every fucking day... fucking horrible... winstars Apr 2016 #111
Kicking for visibility. Surya Gayatri Apr 2016 #82
K&R SharonClark Apr 2016 #88
there he is......misspeaking again! ish of the hammer Apr 2016 #90
K&R HillareeeHillaraah Apr 2016 #91
Thank you, stillone! Cha Apr 2016 #92
K&R 2naSalit Apr 2016 #96
kick DesertRat Apr 2016 #97
Kicked, rec'd and tweeted. Kingofalldems Apr 2016 #98
Glad he completed his investigation and cleared her Matt_in_STL Apr 2016 #102
"As far as I know . . ." Major Hogwash Apr 2016 #113
Or did she use the Govt. server for private Business? RAAVAN Apr 2016 #114
I think the fact that he talked about it means it's not a big deal. Nothing will come of this. Laser102 Apr 2016 #116
There will be no indictment of Hillary Clinton due to the silly e-mail claims Gothmog Apr 2016 #118
way to undermine national security obama... EdwardBernays Apr 2016 #127
Well isn't this special: Kingofalldems Apr 2016 #147
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Obama: Clinton’s Email Se...»Reply #127