Latest Breaking News

still_one

(92,492 posts)

95. i have done it also, no biggie

Reply to titaniumsalute (Reply #89)

Sun Apr 10, 2016, 07:40 PM

Apr 2016

Last edited Sun Apr 10, 2016, 08:49 PM - Edit history (1)

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

150 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Obama: Clinton’s Email Server Did Not Jeopardize National Security [View all] still_one Apr 2016 OP

Would he testify to that under oath? dchill Apr 2016 #1

I think you might be reaching just a bit there due to being biased towards Hillary. cstanleytech Apr 2016 #4

I don't see how you got there. dchill Apr 2016 #6

It was purely based on the tone of your post but like I said if you are not biased cstanleytech Apr 2016 #10

I am a 100% Bernie Sanders supporter. dchill Apr 2016 #55

Nothing wrong with being a Bernie supporter, I think both Hillary and Bernie would be cstanleytech Apr 2016 #58

I prefer to have the FBI and Justice Department come to that conclusion. Mr. Obama has a bias here. roguevalley Apr 2016 #45

No, I'm not refering to the investigation by the FBI and the DOJ. They will find whatever cstanleytech Apr 2016 #57

Well, here's the deal with Obama's opinion CoffeeCat Apr 2016 #128

So you know more about this that President Obama? George II Apr 2016 #71

Unspoken context: the felony statute Sec 793 doesn't require intent or actual jeopardy leveymg Apr 2016 #79

You're assuming quite a bit. Do you have any idea of what the FBI is really investigating? George II Apr 2016 #83

clues? links? anything? leveymg Apr 2016 #99

Well, you're the one who cited "felony statute Sec 793", so figured you knew. George II Apr 2016 #100

I only know the law and a bit of history. That tells me leveymg Apr 2016 #101

Pardoned? murielm99 Apr 2016 #110

You don't have to be charged and convicted to be pardoned. You're confusing leveymg Apr 2016 #112

You are confused. murielm99 Apr 2016 #133

Obama characterized it as an "investigation" the other day. For many months, it has been referenced leveymg Apr 2016 #134

Google is your friend. murielm99 Apr 2016 #136

Evidently. Don't you? dchill Apr 2016 #107

Mr. President Please Explain How Hillary Merits Your Comment As Being "Outstanding" As... notadmblnd Apr 2016 #2

Obama stands behind fracking Cassiopeia Apr 2016 #26

You fell for his trap. He has you talking about hughee99 Apr 2016 #150

Perfect chance for a two-fer! yallerdawg Apr 2016 #3

These are not Democrats here Gman Apr 2016 #20

Correct. But rather than nihilists... ConservativeDemocrat Apr 2016 #47

Best comment ever concerning the... keylargo Apr 2016 #115

Nihilist fits. creon Apr 2016 #61

Double your pleasure, double you fun! LOL! Surya Gayatri Apr 2016 #85

This is becoming right-wing underground I swear titaniumsalute Apr 2016 #5

Are you suggesting that news stories from outlets as Reuters should not be posted if you don't agree still_one Apr 2016 #11

I was responding to post #3. Not your OP. There's your perspective. titaniumsalute Apr 2016 #64

no problem, however your post indicated you were responding to me still_one Apr 2016 #68

yup. Oops. titaniumsalute Apr 2016 #89

i have done it also, no biggie still_one Apr 2016 #95

It is, isn't it. leftyladyfrommo Apr 2016 #65

However Obama said she was careless and didn't "Intentionally" put America in jeopardy Autumn Apr 2016 #7

if she didn't jeopardize national security... tk2kewl Apr 2016 #16

K&R. nt UtahLib Apr 2016 #8

Hear ye, hear ye. The Revolution's kangaroo court is now in session. LuvLoogie Apr 2016 #9

And here I thought DU was a place to comment and discuss stories of political import. FailureToCommunicate Apr 2016 #15

Of course, whether or not national security was jeopardized... thesquanderer Apr 2016 #12

Nice of the President to comment on an ongoing FBI investigation. OnyxCollie Apr 2016 #13

Post removed Post removed Apr 2016 #14

Why does he need to shut up? leftofcool Apr 2016 #17

Because he isn't entitled to an opinion if it doesn't agree with some of the group-think here still_one Apr 2016 #18

Why does he need to shut up? AlbertCat Apr 2016 #25

Under the bus goes Obama! NastyRiffraff Apr 2016 #28

Actually he should be quiet. rtw Apr 2016 #34

Actually do you have anything to support your implication of a criminal investigstion? Cary Apr 2016 #46

How 'bout the FBI? OnyxCollie Apr 2016 #51

Do I know the law? Cary Apr 2016 #63

Since you claim to know the law, OnyxCollie Apr 2016 #67

They don't announce these things so your "conservative" sources are garbage. Cary Apr 2016 #103

You got nothing. OnyxCollie Apr 2016 #108

But off course that was my point Cary Apr 2016 #119

Why are you responding? OnyxCollie Apr 2016 #121

Ah yes, the ad hominem Cary Apr 2016 #122

"My mind is..." OnyxCollie Apr 2016 #123

You are clearly mouthing "conservative" disinformation Cary Apr 2016 #125

And you're spinning. OnyxCollie Apr 2016 #126

Absolutely none of that supports your claim that she, personally, is under investigation Cary Apr 2016 #130

If you say so, it must be true! OnyxCollie Apr 2016 #131

It has nothing whatsoever to do with what I say. Cary Apr 2016 #132

The company you keep Cary Apr 2016 #135

Hear, hear! Thanks for speaking to truth, Cary. Hortensis Apr 2016 #137

Thanks Hortensis Cary Apr 2016 #138

It is extremists' usual fate to be sidelined because Hortensis Apr 2016 #146

The FBI is making no secret of their involvement here. NT rtw Apr 2016 #53

Plenty of good people under that bus Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Apr 2016 #37

They've begun using this one now! LOL! Surya Gayatri Apr 2016 #86

I'm a Bernie supporter, but, seriously. RiverNoord Apr 2016 #35

President Obama gets leeway on several counts. gordianot Apr 2016 #59

Nice summary. RiverNoord Apr 2016 #69

Why not? Cary Apr 2016 #140

Tell that to Don Siegelman. gordianot Apr 2016 #141

So you're claiming that the same thing will happen to Hillary Clinton Cary Apr 2016 #142

Of course not, but sometimes those B.S. right wing conspiracies bite. gordianot Apr 2016 #143

I make a distinction between a frame up and a smear job Cary Apr 2016 #144

Tell that to Bill Clinton and his intern. gordianot Apr 2016 #145

He wasn't framed Cary Apr 2016 #148

He lied always not a good choice. gordianot Apr 2016 #149

Obviously saying 'shut up' TM99 Apr 2016 #84

He wasn't speaking out on an ongoing investigation. beastie boy Apr 2016 #93

WTF? TM99 Apr 2016 #94

One more time, please beastie boy Apr 2016 #104

Um... actually, that's incorrect. RiverNoord Apr 2016 #109

You're right, I concede beastie boy Apr 2016 #120

No need to 'concede' :-) RiverNoord Apr 2016 #124

It's nice to see a Sanders' supporter being reasonable Cary Apr 2016 #139

Okay Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Apr 2016 #36

How does he know? tabasco Apr 2016 #19

The investigation is into whether a crime has even been committed, and if so, by whom. beastie boy Apr 2016 #87

K&R mcar Apr 2016 #21

Republicans consider Obama to be a threat to national security. Spitfire of ATJ Apr 2016 #22

Obama, in an interview broadcast on Fox News Sunday... mr clean Apr 2016 #23

And...? mcar Apr 2016 #24

your point?? riversedge Apr 2016 #105

Where in the article you referenced does it say that her email server didn't jeopardize security? revbones Apr 2016 #27

This is LBN, where the subject line MUST match the article title. To wit.... Hekate Apr 2016 #70

Thanks for replying so nicely. Really shows the positivity of the Hillary followers. revbones Apr 2016 #72

The President is correct again. He knows it's just about politics. I don't care about emails. Trust Buster Apr 2016 #29

Just about everyone in IT who works with email servers does. RiverNoord Apr 2016 #41

Why wasn't it a problem with Powell and Rice? treestar Apr 2016 #117

It is a problem with them also. It suggests a very sloppy attitude toward email security in RiverNoord Apr 2016 #129

As far as he knows nichomachus Apr 2016 #30

Obama is all in for Clinton because he wants to make sure his INdemo Apr 2016 #31

Yes shenmue Apr 2016 #32

This is somebody who has served his country for decades in the military, and Schema Thing Apr 2016 #33

What else would we expect from the man that backs DWS in her Congressional race? jalan48 Apr 2016 #38

What in the hell do you *expect* him to say? bvf Apr 2016 #39

As I predicted, He has to go all in for her Hydra Apr 2016 #42

Yep. Talk about your millstones. n/t bvf Apr 2016 #62

wonder why he is feeling the need to say anything at all. Hiraeth Apr 2016 #40

New York, aka Waterloo Hydra Apr 2016 #43

Love me some Obama but ... I can't wait for NY !!! Hiraeth Apr 2016 #44

pretty much expecting an even split . So PatrynXX Apr 2016 #49

makes for an interesting convention. Hiraeth Apr 2016 #50

Obligatory saving face move. Lars39 Apr 2016 #106

Right. and I'm the Easter Bunny PatrynXX Apr 2016 #48

Yeah... it's not like President Obama knows Bradical79 Apr 2016 #56

This message was self-deleted by its author Vilis Veritas Apr 2016 #52

I often wonder what's to secure that people should be so concerned... tenderfoot Apr 2016 #54

PBO is correct. creon Apr 2016 #60

Only the 'Not Hillary' Party and Republicans care about this. onehandle Apr 2016 #66

Actually, it did. But not in the way the right wingers and Sandernistas will have you believe. beastie boy Apr 2016 #73

REC. and Thank you. riversedge Apr 2016 #74

Enormous K & R. Surya Gayatri Apr 2016 #75

K&R rock Apr 2016 #76

K&R liberal N proud Apr 2016 #77

K&R ismnotwasm Apr 2016 #78

Kick fleabiscuit Apr 2016 #80

Never thought I'd see some Democrats become allies with right wing Kingofalldems Apr 2016 #81

You can see it here every fucking day... fucking horrible... winstars Apr 2016 #111

Kicking for visibility. Surya Gayatri Apr 2016 #82

K&R SharonClark Apr 2016 #88

there he is......misspeaking again! ish of the hammer Apr 2016 #90

K&R HillareeeHillaraah Apr 2016 #91

Thank you, stillone! Cha Apr 2016 #92

K&R 2naSalit Apr 2016 #96

kick DesertRat Apr 2016 #97

Kicked, rec'd and tweeted. Kingofalldems Apr 2016 #98

Glad he completed his investigation and cleared her Matt_in_STL Apr 2016 #102

"As far as I know . . ." Major Hogwash Apr 2016 #113

Or did she use the Govt. server for private Business? RAAVAN Apr 2016 #114

I think the fact that he talked about it means it's not a big deal. Nothing will come of this. Laser102 Apr 2016 #116

There will be no indictment of Hillary Clinton due to the silly e-mail claims Gothmog Apr 2016 #118

way to undermine national security obama... EdwardBernays Apr 2016 #127

Well isn't this special: Kingofalldems Apr 2016 #147