Latest Breaking News

mhatrw

(10,786 posts)

44. LOL. Even after the anthrax attacks & the WMDs, some still believe anything they try to sell you.

Wed Dec 16, 2015, 10:23 PM

Dec 2015

Last edited Thu Dec 17, 2015, 03:00 AM - Edit history (2)

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/before-the-final-shootout-four-mysterious-hours-in-san-bernardino/2015/12/14/95dd65f4-a299-11e5-9c4e-be37f66848bb_story.html

authorities described the remote-control device they hoped to use as a “toy” remote and said it proved to be a dud.

Show us the tape showing them shooting at the police. Show us the tape showing either of them so much as wearing or wielding a gun on that day. I'd really like to see any of these video tapes since you have so confidently assured all of us of their existence. Please link them up!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

76 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

FBI on San Bernardino massacre: Alleged shooters did NOT post support for jihad on social media [View all] azurnoir Dec 2015 OP

WTF!! The Media Lied Before? billhicks76 Dec 2015 #1

WTF is right. FBI sux 840high Dec 2015 #2

well Blitzer certainly does Brainstormy Dec 2015 #4

He knows all about being in Jeopardy.... Spitfire of ATJ Dec 2015 #10

LOL that is precious. nt navarth Dec 2015 #22

Go Andy!!! They_Live Dec 2015 #42

at the time of the attack. Warren Stupidity Dec 2015 #3

"alleged shooters"? former9thward Dec 2015 #5

No, this is about the competence of the Obama administration DougW659 Dec 2015 #7

No, the headline reads "alleged shooters". former9thward Dec 2015 #9

I think the confusion comes from the fact that many are unaware WatchWhatISay Dec 2015 #13

I think it will stay "alleged" until all the ballistic tests are complete. If all the shots were LiberalArkie Dec 2015 #20

Plus there's the apparent disappearance of the third shooter multiple witnesses say they saw. PSPS Dec 2015 #30

I would hope that they know who the person is (if he exists) and are just watching the person LiberalArkie Dec 2015 #31

If they had discovered which mosque she attended TexasMommaWithAHat Dec 2015 #33

And what mosque was that? mhatrw Dec 2015 #60

legally I guess they're currently innocent until proven guilty magical thyme Dec 2015 #14

What makes them so obviously guilty? mhatrw Dec 2015 #19

The carload of guns and ammo they had on them when they engaged in a firefight with police? NickB79 Dec 2015 #29

Produce the videos taken from multiple cameras at multple angles. mhatrw Dec 2015 #57

they apparently knew the police were after them magical thyme Dec 2015 #74

Yeah, a guy with guns had some ammo in his house. So what? mhatrw Dec 2015 #75

do you have a link to those police reports? because my searches are coming up empty magical thyme Dec 2015 #76

I think she did not do it. mhatrw Dec 2015 #21

Did they ever find that 3rd shooter? 99th_Monkey Dec 2015 #6

So the massive gun battle the couple had with police was what, then? NickB79 Dec 2015 #8

Good questions all. 99th_Monkey Dec 2015 #11

Occam's Razor would suggest the witnesses were incorrect NickB79 Dec 2015 #15

Name one witness who saw a woman shooter. You cannot. mhatrw Dec 2015 #17

Wait, they wore tactical gear and facemasks, but unnamed witnesses say they saw white muscular men? NickB79 Dec 2015 #28

San Bernardino Shooting Eyewitness (Sally Abdelmageed) "3 Tall Athletic White Men" 99th_Monkey Dec 2015 #40

What? That's not a witness talking. That is an unnamed source in the "fog of war". mhatrw Dec 2015 #43

Forensics 99th_Monkey Dec 2015 #39

Forensics? We are the Federalis! We don't need no stinkin' forensics! nt mhatrw Dec 2015 #70

They were not pipe bombs. mhatrw Dec 2015 #18

And the shoot-out with police, caught on camera? NickB79 Dec 2015 #24

LOL. Even after the anthrax attacks & the WMDs, some still believe anything they try to sell you. mhatrw Dec 2015 #44

and weapons in their vehicle. 840high Dec 2015 #25

Show me the tape showing weapons in the vehicle. mhatrw Dec 2015 #45

Tiz amazing. 99th_Monkey Dec 2015 #72

But it sure didn't stop Comey from using San Bernardino as a pretext . . . markpkessinger Dec 2015 #12

LOL at anyone who believed the FBI's story on this workplace shooting mhatrw Dec 2015 #16

She wasn't wearing a hijab in the suburban TexasMommaWithAHat Dec 2015 #35

There is no evidence whatsoever that she ever used a gun in her life. mhatrw Dec 2015 #46

The mosque she attended in Pakistan was radical TexasMommaWithAHat Dec 2015 #50

I don't think she ever fired a gun in her life. mhatrw Dec 2015 #53

Sorry, but there were too many witnesses to follow TexasMommaWithAHat Dec 2015 #54

What witness saw a women shooter? Name one. mhatrw Dec 2015 #59

OFFS, GGJohn Dec 2015 #52

You are the one who unquestioningly believes in a conspiracy theory. mhatrw Dec 2015 #55

Without a shred of evidence? GGJohn Dec 2015 #56

You have not been keeping up with the news. mhatrw Dec 2015 #61

Maybe you missed the part where I said "bomb making factory" in their house? GGJohn Dec 2015 #63

Have fun in unquestioning fear mongering CT land. mhatrw Dec 2015 #64

Not what I said, nor have ever said, GGJohn Dec 2015 #67

I like how you think beyond the smoke & mirrors, to ask the right questions. 99th_Monkey Dec 2015 #41

Props to Comey for admitting it. ucrdem Dec 2015 #23

Were they not shooting at 840high Dec 2015 #26

If they were I haven't seen any evidence of it. ucrdem Dec 2015 #27

They were identified at the Xmas party. 840high Dec 2015 #37

There was a story in the SB Sun about a man at the IRC. Update: link ucrdem Dec 2015 #38

Really? Link? mhatrw Dec 2015 #47

They're still the terrorists TexasMommaWithAHat Dec 2015 #32

Yes, I've heard that responsibly reported, ucrdem Dec 2015 #34

He bought two of the weapons. TexasMommaWithAHat Dec 2015 #36

He has supposedly waived his Miranda rights and is discussing this w/o a lawyer. mhatrw Dec 2015 #49

Based on the report of yet another unnamed "law enforcement" source! mhatrw Dec 2015 #48

But not before using it as a pretext for furthering his anti-encryption campaign ... markpkessinger Dec 2015 #58

If the Farooks really executed the worst Muslim terrorist act on US soil since 9/11, mhatrw Dec 2015 #51

Two things stuck out to me NJCher Dec 2015 #62

Three things that surprised me about the apartment. Jesus Malverde Dec 2015 #65

Strange? Considering what this couple has been accused of, I'd go a bit further. nt mhatrw Dec 2015 #66

there are still twelve people dead. Posting support for jihad or not does not ease the grief. demosincebirth Dec 2015 #68

16 shot, including Farook. 13 were county health inspectors, and they were strict. ucrdem Dec 2015 #69

organized crime meets "homeland security" mhatrw Dec 2015 #71

It might take a while to sort this one out. ucrdem Dec 2015 #73