Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pampango

(24,692 posts)
40. Trump Campaign Manager: President Trump Would Admit Zero Syrian Refugees
Thu Sep 24, 2015, 04:21 PM
Sep 2015
“It is time — and Mr. Trump has said this, time and time again — to put Americans first.”

Donald Trump campaign manager Corey Lewandowski said Tuesday that the United States “should take in zero” Syrian refugees.

“This is very simple, the bottom line is we should take in zero,” Lewandowski said when asked by radio host John Fredericks what a President Trump would do about the refugee crisis.

“While I understand our position in the global economy, and how important the United States is in world public affairs, it is time to look at the people who are in our country first who are struggling — the middle class, the bottom class of people who can’t survive — and give them opportunities,” said Lewandowski. “And this is exactly what the issue is, when it comes to not just bringing in refugees, but illegal immigrants.

“It is time to build a wall, it is time to make sure our borders are secure, it is time to make sure that the people who are at the lowest economic status in this country, their jobs are not being taken away from illegal immigrants who are coming to this country illegally,” he continued. “Why don’t we let those people — give them the opportunity to do the jobs, give them the opportunity to have a leg up, give them the opportunity to make their lives better, before we worry about the people in other parts of the world who aren’t U.S. citizens to begin with?”

http://www.buzzfeed.com/ilanbenmeir/trump-campaign-manager-president-trump-would-admit-zero-syri#.cfbol0mZy
Will we still be trying to get "the rebels" to overthrow Damascus? Scootaloo Sep 2015 #1
All the Neo-Cons & Pro-war democrats . . FairWinds Sep 2015 #2
I agree and what are the refugees supposed to do until 2017? wordpix Sep 2015 #4
Already been stated that Bush's reign caused the regional chaos. No one who blm Sep 2015 #11
Well Geez, Mr. blm - FairWinds Sep 2015 #24
Well, then according to you, you'd have no problem naming lawmakers who have blm Sep 2015 #25
This essay from KOS says it well . . FairWinds Sep 2015 #28
And this is really moronic too . . FairWinds Sep 2015 #31
Can't answer, can you? You can't, because no one in modern history HAS blm Sep 2015 #32
Kerrry always caves in the clutch . . FairWinds Sep 2015 #35
You can't name even ONE other lawmaker who's had a more positive REAL effect blm Sep 2015 #37
Hey, if you are Kerry are so not "ignorant" then . . FairWinds Sep 2015 #38
I would say they and you are reliant on underinformed media 'sources' blm Sep 2015 #39
Jeez Dude, maybe I AM one of those Underinformed media "sources" . . FairWinds Sep 2015 #47
heheh….so you'd like to think…. blm Sep 2015 #49
blm is only a decades strong JK supporter. mylye2222 Sep 2015 #43
well, France sure started all this by colonizing Syria in the first place... CTyankee Sep 2015 #41
on Syria it wouod be more UK colonialisme mylye2222 Sep 2015 #44
Oh, yeah. But I have a somewhat personal connection with French colonialism... CTyankee Sep 2015 #45
I blame the Prophet Mohammed for not being more straightforward and succinct. n/t ellisonz Sep 2015 #53
Please correct title itsrobert Sep 2015 #3
done..my error. sorry. Stuart G Sep 2015 #5
I'm against this. earthside Sep 2015 #6
We need to do this Abouttime Sep 2015 #14
Why do you suppose that settling Syrians in red states would change them to blue states? David__77 Sep 2015 #17
To say nothing of the legal and funding issues involved. nt branford Sep 2015 #18
Not just Syrians Abouttime Sep 2015 #19
good? CullenBohannon Sep 2015 #22
Because GOP lie machine wants it said…and repeated. blm Sep 2015 #34
What an absolutely horrible ... earthside Sep 2015 #20
Not at all Abouttime Sep 2015 #21
the problem with putting them in dying small towns is that the towns are dying dembotoz Sep 2015 #30
It seems to me that immigration has always in the long run worked out really well CTyankee Sep 2015 #46
My god! yeoman6987 Sep 2015 #26
Hopefully. Eventually. philosslayer Sep 2015 #48
Some may but I would imagine most would want to go back home yeoman6987 Sep 2015 #51
That's absurd. It's a Republican asshat myth which means you couldn't blm Sep 2015 #33
good annabanana Sep 2015 #7
I agree. These people will come to our shores and be excellent citizens and taxpayers. CTyankee Sep 2015 #9
A lot less than the Vietnamese and Balkan refugees we took but it is a good start. pampango Sep 2015 #8
We took over 200K Vietnamese refugees by 1980 TexasBushwhacker Sep 2015 #10
That means the warmakers are going to continue their war in Syria. Dont call me Shirley Sep 2015 #12
Why not right now? And why so few? I am tired of seeing these people suffer. YOHABLO Sep 2015 #13
congress wont give money JI7 Sep 2015 #15
There is nothing unreasonable about this. Kurska Sep 2015 #16
We have the room yeoman6987 Sep 2015 #27
interesting CullenBohannon Sep 2015 #23
Telling. truthisfreedom Sep 2015 #29
Meanwhile, undocumented immigrants have "plunged" to around 400,000 per year. Lychee2 Sep 2015 #36
Trump Campaign Manager: President Trump Would Admit Zero Syrian Refugees pampango Sep 2015 #40
We can't seem to vet a few hundred individual fighters in Syria very reliably. TwilightGardener Sep 2015 #42
Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2015 #50
I would rather we take care of folks already living in this country bigwillq Sep 2015 #52
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News» Kerry: U.S. will accept ...»Reply #40