Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: (Raw Story/Newsweek) Bernie Sanders endorsement labeled colossal mistake [View all]Response to beam me up scottie (Reply #3)
Post removed
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
161 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
(Raw Story/Newsweek) Bernie Sanders endorsement labeled colossal mistake [View all]
still_one
May 2017
OP
Wise words that apply to the entire nation and national political races.
democratisphere
May 2017
#1
He also said, Trump may not have colluded with he Russians and Dems need lay off the Russia thing.
fun n serious
May 2017
#2
Oh really? Do you have a link to where he said to lay off the Russia thing?
beam me up scottie
May 2017
#3
It's ridiculous to suppose there was no collusion. He ASKED them for hacks, he GAVE them
bettyellen
May 2017
#44
Senators are absolutely speculating about collusion and I agree! Waters, Cummings, Schumer have all
bettyellen
May 2017
#51
So that's a no, senators are not claiming there was definitely collusion.
beam me up scottie
May 2017
#55
I wasn't aware that Breitbart was suggesting there was collision and demanding an investigation.
beam me up scottie
May 2017
#60
Wait, what? Demanding an investigation is speculating that it's nothing?
beam me up scottie
May 2017
#67
So he didn't suggest that it's a nothing burger? We agree - that's what I thought too!
beam me up scottie
May 2017
#70
He did speculate that the investigation would turn up nothing AND Dems would try and
bettyellen
May 2017
#71
Bernie simply said it could turn up nothing and he's right. He didn't suggest there was no collusio.
beam me up scottie
May 2017
#74
It is all about 2017-2018 to me- and supporting Dems for congress and governors...
bettyellen
May 2017
#128
It's 2017 and some are parroting the RW nonsense that maybe there's nothing to
bettyellen
May 2017
#130
You're right, Republicans believed every horrible rumour about Hillary for decades.
beam me up scottie
May 2017
#138
Sanders implied the Dems would politicize the Russian investigation - he floated the possibility
bettyellen
May 2017
#139
+1000, and on top of that, he outright said that people don't have faith in Democrats
R B Garr
May 2017
#141
Yeah, I think this passive aggressive distancing himself is embarrassing only to himself-
bettyellen
May 2017
#142
He also said, Trump may not have colluded with he Russians and Dems need lay off the Russia thing.
LenaBaby61
May 2017
#72
Do you have a link to where he said to lay off Russia? The other poster didn't provide one.
beam me up scottie
May 2017
#77
Do you have a link to where he said to lay off Russia? The other poster didn't provide one.
LenaBaby61
May 2017
#78
A larger point is brought up in an earlier article from the Omaha World Hearld
still_one
May 2017
#10
Republicans do everything possible to place their people in state and local offices...
Trial_By_Fire
May 2017
#12
I didn't present the notion, you did. It's not a game, just as it isn't a game....
George II
May 2017
#41
Would be interesting if they could quantify how many were/are actually bots-
bettyellen
May 2017
#144
Those attacking Sanders made abortion the #1 issue in a conservative leaning race
kristopher
May 2017
#124
Ignoring the fact that the Washington Examiner is a right wing paper, the Omaha World Hearld asked a
still_one
May 2017
#14
I had no idea. I suppose NARAL and other prochoice groups DIDN"T come out against him
m-lekktor
May 2017
#23
I don't think that is what the poster is saying, in fact just the opposite. That NARAL, Perez, and
still_one
May 2017
#31
What does abortion have to do with a mayoral race? It has nothing to do with it, nor can a mayor
still_one
May 2017
#29
So back to reality. Reality is that the 1% global oligarchs used him because....
R B Garr
May 2017
#82
I think you are right on Federal and State races without a doubt. A race for Mayor though is a
still_one
May 2017
#21
Yet people were bitching that Bernie wasn't helping Ossoff enough in moderate Georgia.
PatsFan87
May 2017
#17
I think dealing with Federal and State candidates is much different than dealing with a Mayoral race
still_one
May 2017
#22
I know you were, and the argument you presented that "why only blame Bernie", when Perez, NARAL and
still_one
May 2017
#34
No, it was that he declined to say if Osoff was "progressive enough" - passive aggressive bullshit
bettyellen
May 2017
#54
Elections results cannot be explained logically unless the voting process is transparent
diva77
May 2017
#24
Yes, but one reason they're critical is that there's less consensus than you suggest
Jim Lane
May 2017
#91