General Discussion

Bernardo de La Paz

(49,109 posts)

98. Are you sure you don't mean dihydrogen monoxide?

Reply to Major Nikon (Reply #93)

Sun Sep 11, 2016, 08:06 AM

Sep 2016

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

200 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Glyphosate Found in Childhood Vaccines [View all] lovuian Sep 2016 OP

And? linuxman Sep 2016 #1

This is the 3rd time they've used the same fucked up lab Major Nikon Sep 2016 #6

Maybe you don't want an herbicide/pesticide injected into your body - Duh! womanofthehills Sep 2016 #12

Don't use any dollar bills. You are likely to get addicted to cocaine by your logic (see post #9).nt Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2016 #15

Cocaine is not being injected to my body - bad analogy womanofthehills Sep 2016 #45

Yes it is. You absorb it through your skin from 9 out of 10 paper money bills. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2016 #47

Your comments in this post really speak to a lack of Scientific knowledge. stevenleser Sep 2016 #125

+1,000 nt okaawhatever Sep 2016 #182

It gets even better Major Nikon Sep 2016 #185

But homeopathically, the stuff is lethal...nt SidDithers Sep 2016 #191

Looks like "Mom's Across America" is using the same fucked up pseudoscience lab Major Nikon Sep 2016 #2

And?? La Lioness Priyanka Sep 2016 #3

Oh ffs Warren DeMontague Sep 2016 #4

Junk Science Botany Sep 2016 #5

Do you have any idea how little .123 parts per billion is? LeftyMom Sep 2016 #7

8 times that much is 1 drop of water in an olympic sized swimming pool Major Nikon Sep 2016 #10

You mean it's not going to kill bermuda grass? LeftyMom Sep 2016 #13

Diluted at the rate of 1 drop per 8 olympic sized swimming pools, probably not Major Nikon Sep 2016 #38

Water has a memory Warren DeMontague Sep 2016 #22

you win this thread. La Lioness Priyanka Sep 2016 #129

LMAO n/t trotsky Sep 2016 #200

Vaccines cause autism Major Nikon Sep 2016 #8

No. Your scientist says vaccines DO NOT cause autism. Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2016 #14

Correct. The post was intended to show the same source as the OP is a dipshit anti-vax site Major Nikon Sep 2016 #39

Maybe Robert F. Kennedy won lots of vaccine injury lawsuits womanofthehills Sep 2016 #65

He's an anti-vaxxer, so it's not surprising that he's your hero Major Nikon Sep 2016 #66

lol -nt Bradical79 Sep 2016 #178

Same bogus kind of statistic as cocaine on dollar bills. Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2016 #9

My god! Don't those people know they are swinning in industial solvent?!? LongtimeAZDem Sep 2016 #88

BWAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!! MohRokTah Sep 2016 #11

Vaccine ingredients - latex, mercury, formaldehyde, egg, antiobiotics, dog kidney cells , aluminum womanofthehills Sep 2016 #16

Wackadoo woo MohRokTah Sep 2016 #17

The US flu vaccines are made by about 8 different companies with different formulas womanofthehills Sep 2016 #18

Please stop spreading anti-vaxxer woo. eom MohRokTah Sep 2016 #19

Time magazine - Some people may get a new flu shot that’s made with dog cells womanofthehills Sep 2016 #40

What is anti-science about listing flu shot ingredients? womanofthehills Sep 2016 #20

When your list is complete anti-vaxxer woo. eom MohRokTah Sep 2016 #21

CDC list of vaccine ingredients - How is the list WOO - it's just a fact womanofthehills Sep 2016 #51

Did you know high concentrations of table salt and sugar have antibiotic qualities? Essential oils uppityperson Sep 2016 #148

Nothing. Your CONCLUSIONs are anti-science. Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2016 #23

You have choices - you can choose a vaccine without mercury womanofthehills Sep 2016 #34

You have choices. You can stop eating. You can become a Breatharian. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2016 #36

You now can choose a clean vaccine womanofthehills Sep 2016 #82

You misspelled two of your scary ingredients. LeftyMom Sep 2016 #91

But "antiobiotics, alluminum" are really scary uppityperson Sep 2016 #149

You also have a choice not to be an anti-vaxxer Major Nikon Sep 2016 #42

Or I could be a pro-vaxxer but want a cleaner flu vaccine womanofthehills Sep 2016 #54

No, you just want to scaremonger while simultaneously claiming not to be an anti-vaxxer Major Nikon Sep 2016 #55

My children and grandchildren have had all their childhood vaccines womanofthehills Sep 2016 #62

You do realize getting the actual flu is a much bigger risk with GBS, right? Major Nikon Sep 2016 #69

You are MUCH more likely to get GBS from having the flu than any vx uppityperson Sep 2016 #150

Let me guess... GulfCoast66 Sep 2016 #180

The injuries are not due to the ingredients unless the person is allergic tymorial Sep 2016 #137

The best way to avoid a vx injury is get it in a clinic from a nurse who knows how to safely give vx uppityperson Sep 2016 #152

Antivax shitpost. nt Dr Hobbitstein Sep 2016 #171

Another example of anti-vax nonsense from one of our resident anti-vaxxers Major Nikon Sep 2016 #41

I'm not an anti-vaxxer, BUT.... Dr Hobbitstein Sep 2016 #52

People are so uninformed - they don't even know there are 12 different flu vaccines this season womanofthehills Sep 2016 #63

"People are so uninformed" Dr Hobbitstein Sep 2016 #193

So we are not to discuss any problems with vaccines - zero discussion allowed womanofthehills Sep 2016 #71

Actually, the problem with this sort of discussion Cal Carpenter Sep 2016 #147

I've yet to meet an anti-vaxxer who admits they are anti-vax. MohRokTah Sep 2016 #56

Post #54 Major Nikon Sep 2016 #59

Look at this list of vaccine injuries in babies - most are from the flu vaccine womanofthehills Sep 2016 #61

Just more proof you have no clue about cause and effect Major Nikon Sep 2016 #64

Other countries can sue pharma and they have changed some of their vaccines to make them safer womanofthehills Sep 2016 #70

Jebus, you trot out the right wing loon, Mercola and now the right wing loon, Jeffry Aufderheide Major Nikon Sep 2016 #74

It really doesn't matter about the link - it's a fact - Japan now gives measles, mumps and rubella womanofthehills Sep 2016 #80

Sure, just a coincidence your get your "facts" from anti-vax right wing loons Major Nikon Sep 2016 #84

I see 2 in there that indicate improper administration. Infants get shots not in their shoulder but uppityperson Sep 2016 #154

Post removed Post removed Sep 2016 #75

You can thank biotech and GMO Major Nikon Sep 2016 #92

I think it's a big step in the right direction womanofthehills Sep 2016 #119

Agreed. GMO has all sorts of tangible benefits Major Nikon Sep 2016 #121

WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! MohRokTah Sep 2016 #94

You post YouTube cartoons? Mr Maru Sep 2016 #95

Never eat at a restaurant! They use aluminum pots and more of that gets into food! . . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2016 #24

are you really suggesting people shouldnt vaccinate their kids? Warren DeMontague Sep 2016 #25

I'm suggesting people look at the different flu vaccine and make an educated choice womanofthehills Sep 2016 #26

"Educated choice" Dr Hobbitstein Sep 2016 #29

To her it means education from quacks and cranks Major Nikon Sep 2016 #46

Add another loon to the list Major Nikon Sep 2016 #77

You actually have a choice of about 15 vaccines including the pure Flublock womanofthehills Sep 2016 #81

Educated = choice based upon the woo narrative tymorial Sep 2016 #140

Right, but that's not the proper definition of educated. Dr Hobbitstein Sep 2016 #172

Oh I absolutely agree tymorial Sep 2016 #174

oh, but you're talking about more than just the flu vaccine, aren't you. Warren DeMontague Sep 2016 #30

Not really, the childhood vaccines are very safe now womanofthehills Sep 2016 #73

So the list in post #16 only applies to the annual flu vaccine, then. Warren DeMontague Sep 2016 #78

Childhood vaccines have a good safety record compared to flu vaccines womanofthehills Sep 2016 #83

You are parroting out more anti-vax nonsense Major Nikon Sep 2016 #106

Dog kidney cells?! More vaccines made in a lab mathematic Sep 2016 #28

No, not "dog". Cocker spaniels! uppityperson Sep 2016 #37

Actually I don't know why Novartis picked Cocker Spaniels womanofthehills Sep 2016 #67

It's a cell line, not "female cocker spaniels". The cell line was started in 1958. LeftyMom Sep 2016 #89

Actually it's a cell line from a cocker spaniel in 1958. You do know they grew vxs in horse serum, uppityperson Sep 2016 #144

Yeah, as opposed to using chicken embryos Major Nikon Sep 2016 #53

Actually it's a new different process womanofthehills Sep 2016 #79

None of them contain any fucking latex in the medication itself. LeftyMom Sep 2016 #86

Except you're an anti-vaxxer that prefers to promote right wing anti-vax sites to vaccines Major Nikon Sep 2016 #90

...So you're switching antibiotics for a GMO? Lancero Sep 2016 #96

Now you prefer to inject yourself with a vx made with GMOs? uppityperson Sep 2016 #146

That glass of water on my table Sgent Sep 2016 #58

Evidence and reality are just technicalities that can be easily avoided if one tries hard enough Major Nikon Sep 2016 #60

Woooooooo.... Dr Hobbitstein Sep 2016 #27

you kind of knew eventually these two deals would hook up. Warren DeMontague Sep 2016 #31

They'll be hanging with the flat-earthers and global warming denialists in no time. Dr Hobbitstein Sep 2016 #32

No, they've been that way all along Major Nikon Sep 2016 #57

I think I've been subjected to that wisdom once or twice Warren DeMontague Sep 2016 #76

oh, and do not forget GulfCoast66 Sep 2016 #181

Same. nt Dr Hobbitstein Sep 2016 #194

Separate groups. immoderate Sep 2016 #33

Not according to article in the OP. Dr Hobbitstein Sep 2016 #35

Rarely yes Major Nikon Sep 2016 #48

Not really, they have a tendency to congregate together, you should check out the... Humanist_Activist Sep 2016 #126

See the Time Magazine article above - and CDC info below - Madin-Darby Canine Kidney womanofthehills Sep 2016 #44

Yeah, nice job of editing the Time article by adding emphasis where there was none Major Nikon Sep 2016 #49

It's obvious you have NO idea what you're talking about. Dr Hobbitstein Sep 2016 #50

Post removed Post removed Sep 2016 #97

Sometimes stupidity has it's own level of toxicity Major Nikon Sep 2016 #102

This is not "anti-vaxxer shitbaggery" PatSeg Sep 2016 #132

Which is equally as nutty, but do go on with your bad self... Humanist_Activist Sep 2016 #138

Thank you for enlightening me PatSeg Sep 2016 #143

I have a question, can you give a mechanism of action describing how glyphosate is dangerous... Humanist_Activist Sep 2016 #151

Because you are really interested? PatSeg Sep 2016 #153

Curious, mostly, I mean, I would be happy to change my mind if actual evidence was presented. n/t Humanist_Activist Sep 2016 #159

Okay, I'm sorry PatSeg Sep 2016 #161

Your civility is as broad as is your relevant knowledge. LanternWaste Sep 2016 #196

I find civility is wasted on the alt-reality crowd. n/t Humanist_Activist Sep 2016 #199

ok still_one Sep 2016 #43

From that Science Based Medicine article radical noodle Sep 2016 #85

Glyphosate is less toxic than table salt or household vinegar Major Nikon Sep 2016 #93

Are you sure you don't mean dihydrogen monoxide? Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2016 #98

... Major Nikon Sep 2016 #100

How do they get the level this low? Cicada Sep 2016 #68

The lab that the crank site, "Mom's Across America" uses isn't certified Major Nikon Sep 2016 #72

Agreed, Roundup is in everything now womanofthehills Sep 2016 #87

So is hydric acid Major Nikon Sep 2016 #101

I am so very tired of woo tymorial Sep 2016 #99

Anti "glyphosate" PatSeg Sep 2016 #133

Give me a break. tymorial Sep 2016 #135

Woo Hoo to You Too! PatSeg Sep 2016 #141

Does this mean another year ismnotwasm Sep 2016 #103

Anti-vaxxers at DU should be treated the same as chemtrailers...nt SidDithers Sep 2016 #104

Yup ismnotwasm Sep 2016 #105

Chemtrail stupidity never killed anyone Major Nikon Sep 2016 #107

Yup. Agschmid Sep 2016 #110

Same level of ignorance ... but anti-vax nonsense poses a clear and present danger ... etherealtruth Sep 2016 #127

I wish. Starry Messenger Sep 2016 #165

Or birthers -nt Bradical79 Sep 2016 #179

So many elitists on DU that don't even have a scientific background Harmony Blue Sep 2016 #108

Seneff and Seralini are both crank magnet quacks who make their living peddling pseudoscience Major Nikon Sep 2016 #109

Post removed Post removed Sep 2016 #114

The IARC specifically rejected Seralini's research as complete shit Major Nikon Sep 2016 #122

You cite Seneff AND Seralini? Archae Sep 2016 #115

Give me a break - Seralini's study was exactly the same as Monsanto's only way way longer womanofthehills Sep 2016 #118

BWAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!! MohRokTah Sep 2016 #128

Anyone referencing Seralini has no business questioning the scientific background of DU posters...nt SidDithers Sep 2016 #123

i do have a scientific background and fearmongering is not science. nt La Lioness Priyanka Sep 2016 #130

Woo posts belong in Creative Speculation and nowhere else. SwankyXomb Sep 2016 #131

And asbestos as well PatSeg Sep 2016 #134

"Elitists", you mean people who actually know a thing or two about chemistry and biology? Humanist_Activist Sep 2016 #136

Yeah right PatSeg Sep 2016 #142

From what I can tell, you fail high school level science with the BS you spout... Humanist_Activist Sep 2016 #145

I really don't know how you PatSeg Sep 2016 #156

I'm basing it on all your past posting history, not just this thread. n/t Humanist_Activist Sep 2016 #158

I will abstain PatSeg Sep 2016 #160

Actually I have nothing to be afraid of with my posting history, here, do you want help? Humanist_Activist Sep 2016 #162

Ha, ha! PatSeg Sep 2016 #164

I don't. Who do you mean by "elitist"? uppityperson Sep 2016 #163

I'm sorry PatSeg Sep 2016 #166

Aha, thank you, I appreciate it. Nt uppityperson Sep 2016 #167

Who do you mean by "elitists"? uppityperson Sep 2016 #168

It makes sense, as many vaccines are made with eggs - and glyphosate levels in eggs are higher womanofthehills Sep 2016 #111

You also think right wing loons make sense Major Nikon Sep 2016 #112

You are the one who seems to have a problem with all the progressive sites womanofthehills Sep 2016 #116

Sure, "all" of them Major Nikon Sep 2016 #120

Their science is as bad as their editing. Merck, not Merk, Novartis, not Novaris. RayOfHope Sep 2016 #113

Wait, they misspelled the vaccines in the article? uppityperson Sep 2016 #157

They misspelled the names of two of the manufacturers, Merck and Novartis. RayOfHope Sep 2016 #175

Same nutbag claimed organic food cures autism, fibromyaglia, and Crohn's Major Nikon Sep 2016 #186

It is mighty elitist GulfCoast66 Sep 2016 #183

Using ELISA for this kind of work, and then releasing the results publicly? Buzz Clik Sep 2016 #117

lolz obamanut2012 Sep 2016 #124

Woo site. Odin2005 Sep 2016 #139

wow zappaman Sep 2016 #155

And in everything else, too. MineralMan Sep 2016 #169

Here is just another leg in the Monsanto regime that won't work nolabels Sep 2016 #170

Science just has to evolve too Loki Liesmith Sep 2016 #177

You can observe weed adaptations by just mowing your lawn Major Nikon Sep 2016 #184

Actually grass is the reason we walk mostly on our hind legs nolabels Sep 2016 #189

Had we not developed intelligence we would still be living in trees throwing our shit at each other Major Nikon Sep 2016 #195

We never got to choose what that environment was and we adapted to most of them nolabels Sep 2016 #198

It's no doubt found in infants' amniotic fluid and mothers' breast milk as well. Your point? Hekate Sep 2016 #173

and our kids don't have weeds Enrique Sep 2016 #176

Does this mean we can lump all the anti-vax and GMO hysteria threads together now? msanthrope Sep 2016 #187

For the love of Athena... anti-vaxxers need to learn what the term trace means! Nt LostOne4Ever Sep 2016 #188

So, it's Dorian Gray Sep 2016 #190

Aiiiiiiiieeeeee!!! progressoid Sep 2016 #192

Willful ignorance is a scary thing Blecht Sep 2016 #197