Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

HuckleB

(35,773 posts)
17. No, I did not call the article a straw man.
Thu Jul 21, 2016, 10:56 AM
Jul 2016

Last edited Thu Jul 21, 2016, 11:27 AM - Edit history (2)

That accusation is some bizarro world stuff.

Apparently, you don't know what Straw Men are even though you utilized them in your other posts, and you did so again here.

Since I am nice, I will help you with that: http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Straw_man

If you offer responses to the actual content of the OP without Straw Men and other less than honest attempts to convolute things, then I'll bother to give you a reply. Since, so far, you have chosen to respond to your own imagination, I have no reason to waste my time. Quoting the article does not change the content of your straw men, and the fact that you don't seem to understand that is rather strange.

Still, thanks for the kicks.

Oh, and way to ignore the question about Samsel and Seneff.

Did Samsel and Seneff Show That "Glyphosate Is Poisoning Everyone?" (No.) HuckleB Jul 2016 #1
K and R Ohio Dem Jul 2016 #2
Thank you! HuckleB Jul 2016 #3
I hate anti-science drivel, whether from the right or the left. MohRokTah Jul 2016 #4
Absolutely. It's astounding that so many here get taken in by such fictions. HuckleB Jul 2016 #22
Oh pish posh. progressoid Jul 2016 #5
Samsel and Seneff paper shows ignorance at an astounding level. HuckleB Jul 2016 #6
I took the liberty of checking out Dr. Samsel's publication record. Act_of_Reparation Jul 2016 #7
LOL! Publishing nonsense in crap journals on topics of which she knows nothing... HuckleB Jul 2016 #9
By That Logic. . . ProfessorGAC Jul 2016 #10
No, not really. Act_of_Reparation Jul 2016 #15
I'm not even sure what angle that post is attempting to take. HuckleB Jul 2016 #19
The Reply Made It Obvious ProfessorGAC Jul 2016 #23
I figured that, but I don't know if it's typical of that poster. HuckleB Jul 2016 #24
This is unfortunately going to fall on deaf ears (eyes?) alarimer Jul 2016 #8
And even when it doesn't, the response is Straw Man silliness. HuckleB Jul 2016 #18
I find gaps in his data and his declaration that organic gardens are 'impossible' is just silly. Bluenorthwest Jul 2016 #11
And the classic straw man strikes. HuckleB Jul 2016 #12
I cited the piece you cited, just that I cited the bits you did not want to cite. Bluenorthwest Jul 2016 #13
And you offer up the same straw man, again, and yet another to boot. HuckleB Jul 2016 #14
Lots of sound and fury signifiying nothing. Bluenorthwest Jul 2016 #16
No, I did not call the article a straw man. HuckleB Jul 2016 #17
Kick for all the ignorant anti-science woo freaks on DU. GaYellowDawg Jul 2016 #20
Thank you. HuckleB Jul 2016 #21
This is a great article! ananda Apr 2020 #25
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Glyphosate, Neurological ...»Reply #17