Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts) Sat Feb 13, 2016, 10:50 PM Feb 2016

128

BREAKING: McConnell announces Strict Constitutionalist Argument for why Obama CANNOT Nominate [View all]

Apparently, McConnell is arguing Obama cannot nominate a replacement for Scalia in his final year because black presidents only get 3/5 of a term.

43 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

BREAKING: McConnell announces Strict Constitutionalist Argument for why Obama CANNOT Nominate [View all] MohRokTah Feb 2016 OP

He probably reading from the Bundy Constitution. HooptieWagon Feb 2016 #1

Which Bundy? Ted or Al? Kablooie Feb 2016 #41

All right, I'll admit it... Wounded Bear Feb 2016 #2

Well played. Lochloosa Feb 2016 #3

LMAO leftofcool Feb 2016 #4

Oh Snap! Chasstev365 Feb 2016 #5

I have faith in DU Kber Feb 2016 #32

Oh, snap! frazzled Feb 2016 #6

Brilliant. n/t JFKDem62 Feb 2016 #7

That's funny. . . Journeyman Feb 2016 #8

Excellent malaise Feb 2016 #9

That's so fucked up. joshcryer Feb 2016 #10

LOL! Good one jalan48 Feb 2016 #11

Well played, well played. JonLeibowitz Feb 2016 #12

Interesting way to honor Scalia Geronimoe Feb 2016 #13

You win the Internets today! nt msanthrope Feb 2016 #14

Touche........................................... turbinetree Feb 2016 #15

You dog... Liberal Jesus Freak Feb 2016 #16

I can't believe they're even trying this vdogg Feb 2016 #17

With that, good night and good luck . . . PWPippin Feb 2016 #18

You rule the internet tonight, MohRokTah! nt brer cat Feb 2016 #19

Why couldn't Scalia take Alito with him? mdbl Feb 2016 #20

Lol. Kber Feb 2016 #33

Something we've been dreading. HassleCat Feb 2016 #21

That's about the size of it. kairos12 Feb 2016 #22

fact check: MohRokTah is correct spanone Feb 2016 #23

That's it??????? I clicked on this link for... NOTHING ?????? vkkv Feb 2016 #24

Well, wasn't it a chuckle at least? n/t bvf Feb 2016 #26

My apologies MohRokTah Feb 2016 #27

I expected some ACTUAL content - that is where you failed._________ n/t vkkv Feb 2016 #28

Again, my heartfelt and sincere apologies to you for making you click on a thread... MohRokTah Feb 2016 #30

seems you're the only complaining about being bothered... one_voice Feb 2016 #40

Obviously I value my time more than others and expect greater things from vkkv Feb 2016 #42

Um, it's a joke? MH1 Feb 2016 #43

Made me look! bvf Feb 2016 #25

Results Of Jury Service... WillyT Feb 2016 #29

I gotta assume someone meant to rec and their finger slipped Kber Feb 2016 #34

This is a great post, laughed loud, thanks, for responsible enjoyment except Thinkingabout Feb 2016 #31

LOL n/t JimDandy Feb 2016 #35

Good one! HubertHeaver Feb 2016 #36

Hah! AllyCat Feb 2016 #37

K&R dchill Feb 2016 #38

They're trying to take us back to 1787 d_legendary1 Feb 2016 #39