Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

progressoid

(49,991 posts)
20. Which means spraying more chemicals to keep weeds down.
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 03:21 PM
Jul 2015
The seeds themselves cost less than their biotech counterparts, but a portion of that savings is lost because of the need to use more chemicals to protect crops. Some growers say they have little to lose by switching back to non-GMO crops because of growing resistance to weeds and pests that have developed to some herbicides, such as Monsanto's Roundup.

Dammann, who farms in Essex, said raising non-GMO corn does come with some added risk.

He not only must pay more for herbicides to combat corn borer and root worm insects, but the yields can sometimes be unpredictable if the weather is not ideal. Dammann said in some years, his yields were in line with biotech crops and in other years they fell short.

In 2012, when the Midwest was in its worst drought in decades, output was 30 percent less than his genetically modified corn, he said
.
That is SOOO! Great! dballance Jul 2015 #1
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Jul 2015 #2
In Vermont. Not a whole lot of purchasing power up there. KamaAina Jul 2015 #3
It will trigger already passed laws in 2 other states (CT + Maine) and more are looking to join GreatGazoo Jul 2015 #4
Maine? Is that one of the bills LePew forgot how to veto? KamaAina Jul 2015 #5
He signed it but the present version requires NH and MA to act first GreatGazoo Jul 2015 #6
it's the one time I can understand what he did and why magical thyme Jul 2015 #8
DUzy! meow2u3 Jul 2015 #15
The problem is, that premium paid for GM crops becomes smaller the more that farmers grow them NickB79 Jul 2015 #7
If the inputs (seed and chems) are lower then cost of production could be lower than GMO GreatGazoo Jul 2015 #9
Some inputs are lower, but yields are also usually lower with organic seed NickB79 Jul 2015 #14
"herbicides to combat corn borer and root worm insects?" Archae Jul 2015 #19
Just askin' Thespian2 Jul 2015 #10
This is what happens when you hand science over to big business. C_eh_N_eh_D_eh Jul 2015 #11
It's democracy applied to science. Igel Jul 2015 #13
It is production realigning with cost and revenue. GreatGazoo Jul 2015 #18
I'm a scientific Luddite. hunter Jul 2015 #16
+1000 G_j Jul 2015 #17
Nice! nt raouldukelives Jul 2015 #12
Which means spraying more chemicals to keep weeds down. progressoid Jul 2015 #20
Good news -- No-Till plus non-GMO hybrids = much less pesticide use. GreatGazoo Jul 2015 #21
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»After Years in the Red, F...»Reply #20