Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(78,249 posts)

3. In Vermont. Not a whole lot of purchasing power up there.

Mon Jul 13, 2015, 03:58 PM

Jul 2015

Labeling of GMO foods begins in less than a year, July 1, 2016

We really should have passed Prop 37 in California when we had the chance.

That would have gotten their attention.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

21 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

After Years in the Red, Farms Return to Non-GMO Crops to Regain Profits [View all] GreatGazoo Jul 2015 OP

That is SOOO! Great! dballance Jul 2015 #1

Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Jul 2015 #2

In Vermont. Not a whole lot of purchasing power up there. KamaAina Jul 2015 #3

Maine? Is that one of the bills LePew forgot how to veto? KamaAina Jul 2015 #5

He signed it but the present version requires NH and MA to act first GreatGazoo Jul 2015 #6

it's the one time I can understand what he did and why magical thyme Jul 2015 #8

DUzy! meow2u3 Jul 2015 #15

"herbicides to combat corn borer and root worm insects?" Archae Jul 2015 #19

Just askin' Thespian2 Jul 2015 #10

This is what happens when you hand science over to big business. C_eh_N_eh_D_eh Jul 2015 #11

It's democracy applied to science. Igel Jul 2015 #13

It is production realigning with cost and revenue. GreatGazoo Jul 2015 #18

I'm a scientific Luddite. hunter Jul 2015 #16

+1000 G_j Jul 2015 #17

Nice! nt raouldukelives Jul 2015 #12

Which means spraying more chemicals to keep weeds down. progressoid Jul 2015 #20

Good news -- No-Till plus non-GMO hybrids = much less pesticide use. GreatGazoo Jul 2015 #21