Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

GreatGazoo

(3,937 posts)
Mon Jul 13, 2015, 03:46 PM Jul 2015

After Years in the Red, Farms Return to Non-GMO Crops to Regain Profits [View all]

When Justin Dammann enters his southwestern Iowa cornfield this month, the 35-year-old farmer will sow something these 2,400 acres have not seen in more than a decade — plants grown without genetically modified seeds.

The corn, which will head to a processor 20 miles down the road this fall, will likely make its way into tortilla shells, corn chips and other consumable products made by companies taking advantage of growing consumer demand for food without biotech ingredients.

For Dammann and other Midwest farmers, the burgeoning interest in non-GMO foods has increased how much they get paid to grow crops in fields once populated exclusively with genetically modified corns and soybeans. The revenue hike is a welcome benefit at a time when lower commodity prices are pushing farm income down to what's expected to be the lowest level in six years.

"We never really thought we would go back to (non-GMO). But the consumer, in my opinion, has sent a clear message that a certain percentage of our customers are willing to pay more for the non-GMO lines," Dammann said. "This non-GMO thing has seemed to take hold and gain a lot of traction."

http://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/money/agriculture/2015/04/18/non-gmo-farming/25951693/

Lots more detail at the link. Basically farmers are finding lower costs and higher revenues in non-GMO crops. Seed and inputs are cheaper and the crop sells for a premium over GMO. There is a glut of corn and soy which has kept prices so low that the Federal government will kick in $8 billion for 2014 to subsidize those who grew GMO crops and lost money doing so. Meanwhile farmers who switch back to non-GMO corn and soy are returning their farms to profitability and getting off the government dole.

The value of GMO corn has fallen 46% since 2012. Other data shows consumer demand for non-GMO foods is nearly doubling year over year with farmers and supply chain managers scrambling to keep up with rising demand:

Sales of verified non-GMO foods in the US:

2011 — $1.2 billion

2012 — $2.7 billion

2013 — $5 billion

2014 — $8.5 billion


Labeling of GMO foods begins in less than a year, July 1, 2016, and corporations like General Mills are pushing their suppliers to be ready to meet much-increased demand as a result.


21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
That is SOOO! Great! dballance Jul 2015 #1
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Jul 2015 #2
In Vermont. Not a whole lot of purchasing power up there. KamaAina Jul 2015 #3
It will trigger already passed laws in 2 other states (CT + Maine) and more are looking to join GreatGazoo Jul 2015 #4
Maine? Is that one of the bills LePew forgot how to veto? KamaAina Jul 2015 #5
He signed it but the present version requires NH and MA to act first GreatGazoo Jul 2015 #6
it's the one time I can understand what he did and why magical thyme Jul 2015 #8
DUzy! meow2u3 Jul 2015 #15
The problem is, that premium paid for GM crops becomes smaller the more that farmers grow them NickB79 Jul 2015 #7
If the inputs (seed and chems) are lower then cost of production could be lower than GMO GreatGazoo Jul 2015 #9
Some inputs are lower, but yields are also usually lower with organic seed NickB79 Jul 2015 #14
"herbicides to combat corn borer and root worm insects?" Archae Jul 2015 #19
Just askin' Thespian2 Jul 2015 #10
This is what happens when you hand science over to big business. C_eh_N_eh_D_eh Jul 2015 #11
It's democracy applied to science. Igel Jul 2015 #13
It is production realigning with cost and revenue. GreatGazoo Jul 2015 #18
I'm a scientific Luddite. hunter Jul 2015 #16
+1000 G_j Jul 2015 #17
Nice! nt raouldukelives Jul 2015 #12
Which means spraying more chemicals to keep weeds down. progressoid Jul 2015 #20
Good news -- No-Till plus non-GMO hybrids = much less pesticide use. GreatGazoo Jul 2015 #21
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»After Years in the Red, F...