Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: DID you see Bernie Sanders on Reliable Sources just now? [View all]AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)26. He is referring to this
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
89 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Would everyone post an internet-available link when adding these topics, please?
erronis
May 2015
#7
I half expected them to break away to cover Hillary arriving somewhere.....
Spitfire of ATJ
May 2015
#23
I am glad you agree that the Corp-Media (owned by major corporations) are ignoring the candidate
rhett o rick
May 2015
#44
Perhaps because the "people's candidate" won't be able to get the people to vote for him?
brooklynite
May 2015
#48
She is clearly Wall Streets choice. The billions they have to buy the election
rhett o rick
May 2015
#50
I didn't forget the Republicons. The Oligarchs will give them some support but they
rhett o rick
May 2015
#53
So in your opinion Bernie is a weaker candidate then any of the possible republicans....
daleanime
May 2015
#54
Based on polling and the political profile of the States in play? Absolutely.
brooklynite
May 2015
#60
I like to take benign statements and pretend they're de-facto positions too.
LanternWaste
May 2015
#70
Yes, it's quite refreshing I must say. And Bernie probably doesn't have pollsters tellin him what isues he should duck.
InAbLuEsTaTe
May 2015
#52
How about we get the personality/ownership discussion out there and let Bernie deal with issues?
erronis
May 2015
#8
That was a good interview. And come to think about it - that is the difference between the "news"
jwirr
May 2015
#15
That was before the media got totally co-opted as a propaganda mechanism
Jackpine Radical
May 2015
#18
Then how do we 40% know? Are those avenues closed to the 60% for some reason?
whatthehey
May 2015
#88
Video: Bernie Sanders Slams Press For Campaign Coverage On CNN's Reliable Sources
Purveyor
May 2015
#28
10% of the population owns 80% of the wealth. So what fucking difference does it make
KingCharlemagne
May 2015
#39
Propaganda works that's why it's used. The Plutocratic-Oligarchs buy propaganda and
rhett o rick
May 2015
#46
You think the billions "donated" by Wall Street will win out over the power
rhett o rick
May 2015
#49
But Sen Warren isn't running. Funny how people suddenly believe in the system if
rhett o rick
May 2015
#64
Insulting me won't make any difference. Maybe makes you feel taller. I don't for a minute
rhett o rick
May 2015
#67
I am having trouble with your "reality based" logic. First of all it's a fact of politics and
rhett o rick
May 2015
#69
Oh plez. Corporations have all their execs give to the campaign. That's not fooling anyone
rhett o rick
May 2015
#74
It's not an "insult" to use the clear meaning of your words in context
ConservativeDemocrat
May 2015
#80
Your word games don't change the facts that corporations donate millions by "encouraging" their
rhett o rick
May 2015
#85
If you want your words to mean something other than they explicitly mean...
ConservativeDemocrat
May 2015
#86
Sen Sanders may not be able to overcome the huge financial donations that HRC will get.
rhett o rick
May 2015
#78
I have never once mentioned Benghazi nor will I ever. I do mention that she betrayed the
rhett o rick
May 2015
#84