Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The more piling on of Sanders I see [View all]upaloopa
(11,417 posts)112. It was not a statistical anslysys
It only represents those who chose to take part.
For it to be representative of DU it would have to be made up of a truly random sample of ALL DUers where each person had an equal chance of being SELECTED.
Study statistics
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
203 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Hillary is not a war nut: the only one who is Tom Cotton, he says we can take Iran in 7 days!
lewebley3
May 2015
#171
Are you saying that because someone somewhere called HRC a warmonger that justifies you calling Sen
rhett o rick
May 2015
#139
I understand, but you should be clearer. To be clear, I'm not fond of Clinton's record on war.
Eleanors38
May 2015
#160
He is "pro-Israel" in that he thinks Israel has a right to exist and to defend itself . . .
markpkessinger
May 2015
#167
What a pig-like response. She ran for Senator, President and confirmed Sec. of State
KittyWampus
May 2015
#87
He isn't being ravaged, either. It's a handful of issues. Most of which can be explained
KittyWampus
May 2015
#88
Frankly, I wish the feet fire holders WOULD call attention to his "gun nuttedness."
Eleanors38
May 2015
#142
And what's so incredibly stupid about all of this is -- HE'S NOT BEING ANYTHING NEAR RAVAGED
Number23
May 2015
#155
No politician is above criticism, that's for sure. But what's happening with him now is pure slander
cui bono
May 2015
#26
I was asking someone else a question. Did you mean to respond to someone else? nt
MADem
May 2015
#45
I simply did not notice that ONE time. However, people should at least look before mindlessly,
merrily
May 2015
#62
On this thread, I recommended a post that opposed piling on re: the candidate of my choice.
merrily
May 2015
#104
Tell it to someone else. It's not my group. I didn't start it. I'm not a host of that group.
merrily
May 2015
#181
It was smarmy. And now, rather than acknowledge my answer to your question of what lies
cui bono
May 2015
#153
I don't have to read your post to see that all you want to do is have infighting.
cui bono
May 2015
#166
" It only matters when it's YOUR ox getting the old gore" How do you come by that?
cui bono
May 2015
#175
I don't "seem to be" doing anything. I told you what my issues with your comments were.
MADem
May 2015
#187
I have no interest in demonizing you--my sole goal was to impress upon you that your
MADem
May 2015
#190
This site is about to fall in on itself. There aren't enough popcorn smilies in the world for
Number23
May 2015
#159
So I take it that you wouldn't do what I did when someone attacked Hillary and her supporters,
cui bono
May 2015
#134
His actual voting record is not a smear. It's a bad sign when simply discussing his actual record
KittyWampus
May 2015
#93
I've seen people trumpet Bernie's vote on the Brady bill as proof that he's a gun nut.
winter is coming
May 2015
#174
I'm not sure the perceived threat is that Bernie will be a viable candidate.
winter is coming
May 2015
#173
That's part of it I'm sure, but they would have to be crazy not to see that this is not just
sabrina 1
May 2015
#191
Funny how so many DUers were saying the opposite before Bernie declared, though.
merrily
May 2015
#42
Yes, that game of "willful misinterpretation" hurts terribly when that shoe goes on the other foot.
MADem
May 2015
#34
For the umpteenth time, Obama got well deserved criticism. He's a centrist a self described
cui bono
May 2015
#132
the gun nut thing was from a thread title. LOL. And a very few outlier comments
KittyWampus
May 2015
#96
I disagree based on what I've seen. I've just seen counters to the slander filled with facts.
cui bono
May 2015
#130
hard to tell what purpose their scolding and bullying is supposed to serve
carolinayellowdog
May 2015
#15
Are 'commies' gun nuts? It's going to be hard to call him a 'socialist commie' AND 'a right
sabrina 1
May 2015
#43
Yes. And now they are the ones with the purity test, but for the opponent of their
cui bono
May 2015
#25
"ignoring the fact that lefties have never held out for a 'perfect' candidate, just a good one".
liberal_at_heart
May 2015
#35
+1. I don't expect Bernie to fix everything, but at least he won't lie to me about
winter is coming
May 2015
#202
Please, Bernie has been treated with kid gloves compared to what Hillary bashers have
okaawhatever
May 2015
#20
One can support gun ownership without being a gun-humper. Either way, and issue, not my main issue.
Ed Suspicious
May 2015
#58
My number one issue has always been education but we won't be able to do anything about
liberal_at_heart
May 2015
#61
I agree. Once we remove the corruption influence of big money from the equation, our issues become
Ed Suspicious
May 2015
#64
For someone who's supposedly a no-hope candidate, a surprising amount of energy
winter is coming
May 2015
#60
Poor Bernie.. can he take it? Looking into his record? I think so. Wee bit of hypocrisy going
Cha
May 2015
#72
The OP reminds me of teenagers who like their boyfriends the more their parents
KittyWampus
May 2015
#97
I'm the same way in regards to Clinton. I guess we're both easily manipulated...
LanternWaste
May 2015
#122