Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Be Smart HassleCat Apr 2015 #1
Yup. I'm voting for Sanders in NY's primary. geek tragedy Apr 2015 #2
^^ This ^^ Hutzpa Apr 2015 #24
absolutely cali Apr 2015 #3
the "Clinton Foundation only gives 15% of its money away" smear from Rush Limbaugh geek tragedy Apr 2015 #5
results from rw crap. seabeyond Apr 2015 #4
Thanks. As it turns out, of course, Rush Limbaugh and IBD were being dishonest. geek tragedy Apr 2015 #6
Barely getting it hidden. The trolls that control the juries must be napping. nt onehandle Apr 2015 #7
I was #5. Couldnt believe it was that close. nt bunnies Apr 2015 #13
it was good to read juror 5. can you figure out which juror i was? nt seabeyond Apr 2015 #14
7? bunnies Apr 2015 #17
brilliant. i know i held back a tad. seabeyond Apr 2015 #18
haha!! bunnies Apr 2015 #19
While I hear what you are saying - when we are not in a campaign we often post rw junk to jwirr Apr 2015 #8
true dat, but there's a little too much eagerness to latch onto anything anti-Clinton. geek tragedy Apr 2015 #9
Okay. Well I am not that person. I am very aware that I may have to support her as my candidate jwirr Apr 2015 #10
yeah I'm not her biggest fan either (was an Obama 2008 person) geek tragedy Apr 2015 #11
I don't see how this will be a problem for Bernie. ieoeja Apr 2015 #12
Not a problem at all. See my avatar. nt geek tragedy Apr 2015 #16
And such an attitude can only mean one thing, they are rightwingers. NoJusticeNoPeace Apr 2015 #26
Right? Let's talk about differences in policy positions between our primary candidates cyberswede Apr 2015 #15
I second that. libdem4life Apr 2015 #20
What do people think about posting RW hit pieces to elicit comment? Jim Lane Apr 2015 #21
That is largely unobjectionable geek tragedy Apr 2015 #22
Thanks, I agree. Now for the tough part... Jim Lane Apr 2015 #25
the problem is that attacks degrade people's perceptions of the attacked, even if the attacks geek tragedy Apr 2015 #27
But that "degrading" can occur even if the poster expressly disagrees with the attack Jim Lane Apr 2015 #28
problem is that if we throw the floor open to the discussionist crowd and they geek tragedy Apr 2015 #29
I don't know if they'll "feel welcome" if they're constantly refuted. Jim Lane Apr 2015 #31
there's a debunking group. geek tragedy Apr 2015 #33
Thanks, I didn't even know about that group! Jim Lane Apr 2015 #35
Good job Hutzpa Apr 2015 #23
This message needs to be pinned to the top Blue_Tires Apr 2015 #30
well Robbins Apr 2015 #32
Excellent. hifiguy Apr 2015 #34
Amen. If you want that shit, go over to the cesspool Damansarajaya Apr 2015 #36
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»helpful hint for those tr...»Reply #6