Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 12:53 PM Apr 2015

helpful hint for those trying to defeat Clinton's primary candidacy: [View all]

Posting and recommending hit pieces from rightwing websites makes you look like you're obsessed with her personally, and are acting out of personal animosity instead of policy disagreement.

Flogging stuff like Benghazi emails and editorials from Investors Business Daily, whose views are reflected in this piece:

http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/041312-607800-obamacare-ominously-similar-to-soviet-socialized-medicine.htm

is generally what trolls, rightwingers, and straight-up haters engage in.

Respectfully,

Democrats who aren't in love with Clinton but despise rightwing talking points



36 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Be Smart HassleCat Apr 2015 #1
Yup. I'm voting for Sanders in NY's primary. geek tragedy Apr 2015 #2
^^ This ^^ Hutzpa Apr 2015 #24
absolutely cali Apr 2015 #3
the "Clinton Foundation only gives 15% of its money away" smear from Rush Limbaugh geek tragedy Apr 2015 #5
results from rw crap. seabeyond Apr 2015 #4
Thanks. As it turns out, of course, Rush Limbaugh and IBD were being dishonest. geek tragedy Apr 2015 #6
Barely getting it hidden. The trolls that control the juries must be napping. nt onehandle Apr 2015 #7
I was #5. Couldnt believe it was that close. nt bunnies Apr 2015 #13
it was good to read juror 5. can you figure out which juror i was? nt seabeyond Apr 2015 #14
7? bunnies Apr 2015 #17
brilliant. i know i held back a tad. seabeyond Apr 2015 #18
haha!! bunnies Apr 2015 #19
While I hear what you are saying - when we are not in a campaign we often post rw junk to jwirr Apr 2015 #8
true dat, but there's a little too much eagerness to latch onto anything anti-Clinton. geek tragedy Apr 2015 #9
Okay. Well I am not that person. I am very aware that I may have to support her as my candidate jwirr Apr 2015 #10
yeah I'm not her biggest fan either (was an Obama 2008 person) geek tragedy Apr 2015 #11
I don't see how this will be a problem for Bernie. ieoeja Apr 2015 #12
Not a problem at all. See my avatar. nt geek tragedy Apr 2015 #16
And such an attitude can only mean one thing, they are rightwingers. NoJusticeNoPeace Apr 2015 #26
Right? Let's talk about differences in policy positions between our primary candidates cyberswede Apr 2015 #15
I second that. libdem4life Apr 2015 #20
What do people think about posting RW hit pieces to elicit comment? Jim Lane Apr 2015 #21
That is largely unobjectionable geek tragedy Apr 2015 #22
Thanks, I agree. Now for the tough part... Jim Lane Apr 2015 #25
the problem is that attacks degrade people's perceptions of the attacked, even if the attacks geek tragedy Apr 2015 #27
But that "degrading" can occur even if the poster expressly disagrees with the attack Jim Lane Apr 2015 #28
problem is that if we throw the floor open to the discussionist crowd and they geek tragedy Apr 2015 #29
I don't know if they'll "feel welcome" if they're constantly refuted. Jim Lane Apr 2015 #31
there's a debunking group. geek tragedy Apr 2015 #33
Thanks, I didn't even know about that group! Jim Lane Apr 2015 #35
Good job Hutzpa Apr 2015 #23
This message needs to be pinned to the top Blue_Tires Apr 2015 #30
well Robbins Apr 2015 #32
Excellent. hifiguy Apr 2015 #34
Amen. If you want that shit, go over to the cesspool Damansarajaya Apr 2015 #36
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»helpful hint for those tr...