Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

maxrandb

(15,478 posts)
Mon Mar 16, 2015, 10:19 AM Mar 2015

I may be over-simplifying this but (re: Water Shortages) [View all]

but is it time that we began thinking of a "Strategic Water Reserve"? I'm not sure how it would work, but it seems that there could be better things to do with all that snow in the Northeast than just plowing it into the ocean or the bay?

Science was never one of my strong subjects, but I guess that most rain and snow eventually works it's way into the aquifers, or is evaporated and gets back into the atmosphere, but it seems like there are areas that have too much rain, snow, etc., and other areas that have too little. If we could somehow capture the excess in one area and use in another, it would seem to make sense.

We have a strategic oil reserve, maybe it's time for a strategic water reserve. You can't drink oil.

24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If they can build this for oil, they could build on for water. panader0 Mar 2015 #1
I don't think that this could be done for the needed amounts of water. drm604 Mar 2015 #7
As long as we are smart and build the reserve somewhere up North.. snooper2 Mar 2015 #2
LOL< NM_Birder Mar 2015 #12
Good one!!! n/t Yo_Mama Mar 2015 #19
That snow is so dirty that it would be be very expensive to purify. hack89 Mar 2015 #3
Understood maxrandb Mar 2015 #5
Who would pay for it? hack89 Mar 2015 #6
I believe the 1% maxrandb Mar 2015 #10
If I am not mistaken that is why the dams in the west were built in the first place but not there jwirr Mar 2015 #13
"Damns"?! KamaAina Mar 2015 #21
LOL Did not look at what I was typing. jwirr Mar 2015 #24
That would be too logical for Republicans to get a handle on. world wide wally Mar 2015 #4
Adopting less wasteful crop watering would help a lot. hobbit709 Mar 2015 #8
Absolutely - land useage is an important factor in this. jwirr Mar 2015 #14
Thank you. KamaAina Mar 2015 #22
some thoughts DetlefK Mar 2015 #9
Spent some time in the San Jaquin Valley maxrandb Mar 2015 #11
No one is disputing what a marvelous thing they did but the climate has changed all across the jwirr Mar 2015 #15
Haven't they reduced the flow to the west side B2G Mar 2015 #20
Global warming and climate change is relentless. hunter Mar 2015 #16
"Reduce" comes first on the strategies for surviving climate change GreatGazoo Mar 2015 #17
The problem with water in Cal, is the public financing of the welfare queen agriculture industry. greatlaurel Mar 2015 #18
Thanks. Very informative articles maxrandb Mar 2015 #23
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I may be over-simplifying...