Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I'm starting to smell a rat... [View all]calimary
(81,459 posts)133. Man, I wondered that myself.
My husband and I were talking about it yesterday and it suddenly dawned on my - what if it was Sony all along? That would be one of the most devious PR campaigns in motion picture history! Cuz it's probably gonna make a fortune, relatively speaking, of course, since it's only in - what - 300 theaters?
But I heard so much commentary about it saying it was a real so-so movie that'd probably do next to nothing in general release. But NOW it's a big controversial hot potato and everyone's gonna want to check it out to see what all the fuss was about.
Wouldn't surprise me.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
169 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
you should know by now that we never let the facts interfer with a good conspiracy
DrDan
Dec 2014
#3
I know what you mean - the longer the thread, the more the creative twist to reality
DrDan
Dec 2014
#161
So are you suggesting we have a test to decide on how knowledgeable posters are before they
rhett o rick
Dec 2014
#75
I agree with your second sentence but not your first. When a person's first reaction
rhett o rick
Dec 2014
#37
" this one would be of no gain to the conspirators" I must admire your certainty.
rhett o rick
Dec 2014
#80
Let's get something straight. I am not an authoritarian and don't bow to your demands.
rhett o rick
Dec 2014
#134
Maybe they want to see what the bottom line would be to release a film directly to the internet?
A Simple Game
Dec 2014
#122
I would be happy for you to give me your ideas and said so in my first post.
A Simple Game
Dec 2014
#142
I've been marketing movies for 30 years while you've been avoiding movie theaters
zappaman
Dec 2014
#145
How rude to call someone that you don't agree with "nuts" and saying their OP is "idiotic".
rhett o rick
Dec 2014
#20
Of course sir. Please forgive my slip out of the authoritarian "reality" for a post.
rhett o rick
Dec 2014
#29
It must smell like fish, because it sure as hell doesn't smell like money.
AtheistCrusader
Dec 2014
#46
I am not arguing that this was or wasn't a conspiracy. My concern is that we can discuss
rhett o rick
Dec 2014
#73
Then something like 'smells fishy' should be accompanied by facts. Such as 'Cui Bono'
AtheistCrusader
Dec 2014
#79
It's never appropriate to call posters names. And I think it a little audacious for you to
rhett o rick
Dec 2014
#137
And when that happens you have a lot of options. Name calling should not be one. nm
rhett o rick
Dec 2014
#112
I hear that Bush Jr. was advised of the film's storyline in August, yet he did nothing.
Orrex
Dec 2014
#27
Sony will lose their ass on this movie. You don't get it. And they would not leak their own.....
Logical
Dec 2014
#140
I understand the Germans who revered the character Cruise played found his performance
MADem
Dec 2014
#166
That's absurd. It's just absurd. Executives destroy their own reputations and important
Bluenorthwest
Dec 2014
#8
Exactly. You can't even put a dollar value on the torched relationships with various
AtheistCrusader
Dec 2014
#50
I love how the GOP tells their supporters it's their duty to go see 'The Interview'
LynneSin
Dec 2014
#9
I smell one Stupid Nation, united under terror by media. 2 weeks ago folks were terrified of NK
Fred Sanders
Dec 2014
#32
I suspect the sarcasm tag was supposed to be unnecessary for obvious reasons
Nac Mac Feegle
Dec 2014
#33
I have known this story line was bogus from the first second. As for a PR stunt? I don't know, but
GoneFishin
Dec 2014
#44
If so it would make more sense if the film was in general release rather than the now
Nuclear Unicorn
Dec 2014
#48
If it was planned, it wouldn't have been planned with racist executive emails.
cigsandcoffee
Dec 2014
#49
Said it last night to the wife ...it's a form of disaster economics ...for the MPA.
L0oniX
Dec 2014
#54
If this turns out to be fact, I think Sony should be brought up on charges for stirring up a crisis"
zappaman
Dec 2014
#151
I'm glad you don't work for a PR firm if this is your idea of a stunt...
Drunken Irishman
Dec 2014
#83
Well guess what? Reuters is in on the conspiracy! Shh...don't tell the 'concerned' for Sony!
Rex
Dec 2014
#118
Perhaps the whole thing was a ruse to get China's cooperation so we could take out N.K.'s
Lodestar
Dec 2014
#162
Umm, Sony intentionally pissed off all their women actors, execs, and staff for one movie?
X_Digger
Dec 2014
#120
I'm skeptical, like the dude from Cloudflare. Disgruntled insider a possibility.
WorseBeforeBetter
Dec 2014
#136
With such a limited openning? If the movie's bad, it'll tank with a smaller numbers.
marble falls
Dec 2014
#138
My wife and I came to the same conclusion during a phone call a couple of days ago.
denbot
Dec 2014
#146
Then there's the potential lawsuits from Sony employees because of violations of privacy....
Spitfire of ATJ
Dec 2014
#149
Agree, PR stunt. If it EVER was unsafe, they would not be showing the movie.
TheNutcracker
Dec 2014
#153
Archae, I don't put anything past anybody. A dumb Fuck (Bush) sold a war to a lot of Dumb Fucks..
BlueJazz
Dec 2014
#155
I'm sure it's not a PR stunt. That's a conspiracy theory. Far too many people are involved.
Omnith
Dec 2014
#156
I don't think any of this was an intentional "PR Stunt" on the part of Sony...
elzenmahn
Dec 2014
#157
All I know is that it looks like a stupid movie and I'm certainly not going to go see it just
liberal_at_heart
Dec 2014
#159