Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Hillary Clinton Tells Wall Street She Believes Anti-Wall Street Rhetoric ‘Foolish’ [View all]Legalequilibrium78
(103 posts)83. She is a Senator from
The blue state of Masachusetts!! She is not the President, so of course she is not Obama. Invalid comparisons.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
232 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Hillary Clinton Tells Wall Street She Believes Anti-Wall Street Rhetoric ‘Foolish’ [View all]
Ichingcarpenter
Dec 2014
OP
Statements like these from her make me dislike her more and more. Proceed Hillary...n/t
monmouth4
Dec 2014
#1
of course. However, this is December 13, and the post implies that it is a direct response to
still_one
Dec 2014
#26
No doubt Hillary can explain it away in typical "Third Way" bullshit fashion. Precisely why we need Elizabeth to be our candidate. . .
InAbLuEsTaTe
Dec 2014
#188
Hillary should about Obama's mantra on war crimes, "We should look forward not back," for her
yurbud
Dec 2014
#231
Absolutely not. It is quite relevant. The only thing that might get confused that this was a direct
still_one
Dec 2014
#157
With these statements, Hillary has completely disqualified herself as the Democratic candidate as far as I'm concerned.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Dec 2014
#190
1 year, 5 years, yes it is relevant toe the present. 30 years, not necessarily. A lot can change,
still_one
Dec 2014
#156
Yeah, but what's your point? You're not implying that we shouldn't pay attention to what was said,
rhett o rick
Dec 2014
#126
nope not implying that at all, especially within a one year time frame. Even several years time
still_one
Dec 2014
#155
How hard can it be? Any Dem not in Wall Street's hip pocket would be an improvement.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Dec 2014
#199
"We all got into this together." Spoken like a true corporatist, she loves her TPP agreement too.
mother earth
Dec 2014
#6
Exactly, apologies if I was not clear, I forget it's not always clear to those who still don't get
mother earth
Dec 2014
#122
If only she would give me a few million it'd make me feel like we are in this together too.
L0oniX
Dec 2014
#134
FWIW, it takes 14 "pgdn"s on my machine to get past it. I've counted. Several times. nt
Buns_of_Fire
Dec 2014
#121
Yup, waiting on that silly post in 3, 2, 1... No one is buyin that crap. Hillary is toast before she even gets out of the gate. Bring on Elizabeth!!
InAbLuEsTaTe
Dec 2014
#197
Please make clear that this is from December 2013. That does not make the point invalid, but it
still_one
Dec 2014
#8
I didn't miss it. That speech was when I stopped supporting Hillary and decided I will not vote
Autumn
Dec 2014
#14
and that is valid. It is just that the OP should make it clear since it is worded in present tense
still_one
Dec 2014
#21
you are full of crap. If you read my post, I said it was a valid criticism. I just said that the
still_one
Dec 2014
#22
yeah, I have a super secret motive to get ted cruz elected along with clinton. Or perhaps I am just
still_one
Dec 2014
#161
First of all I haven't decided who I will vote for in the primaries believe it or not
still_one
Dec 2014
#212
As long as you vote that is all that matters. I agree and understand your point, they are well
still_one
Dec 2014
#225
The reason I brought it up is because the timing coincides with Senator's Warren's speech, and it
still_one
Dec 2014
#165
BS. Here's a link with her sponsored bills. She walks the talk. She's NOT Obama!!
RiverLover
Dec 2014
#78
Some of your points are valid, but it should be remembered also that Massachusetts elected romney,
still_one
Dec 2014
#162
No, no, Hillary was duped! Dontcha know? Another reason we need to elect a more qualified candidate.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Dec 2014
#198
IF it was about the money she would just continue to give speeches which used to be
Thinkingabout
Dec 2014
#19
Yes, it does appear some are very jealous, they continue to rant about anyone who has
Thinkingabout
Dec 2014
#49
No, its the Big Money that is controlling our "elected reps" & govt policies that is the problem.
RiverLover
Dec 2014
#60
As soon as this endless baseless cognitive dissonance ends, yep that's when it will end.
Thinkingabout
Dec 2014
#95
Get with the program, look below, I proved you wrong. Trolls are the ones with
RiverLover
Dec 2014
#101
Trolls, you must be thinking about the cognitive dissonance of others, I am not a troll,
Thinkingabout
Dec 2014
#117
To be honest you do appear a bit like you could live comfortably in a "bridge adjacent" environment
Dragonfli
Dec 2014
#142
More a candid observation really, I wasn't trying to explain anything - good or otherwise.
Dragonfli
Dec 2014
#146
Perhaps you could fine a more appropriate method than name calling, it dors not raise one's
Thinkingabout
Dec 2014
#147
Acknowledgement of facts oa everyone's part is good. Anyone who has the qualifications to be in the
Thinkingabout
Dec 2014
#119
They don't take contributions from banks. Hillary does. Here's alist and a link for ya~
RiverLover
Dec 2014
#66
The cash that Goldman-Sachs gave to H. Clinton-Sachs went directly into her pocket.
rhett o rick
Dec 2014
#130
Why don't you make a statement instead of trying to manipulate me with silly questions?
rhett o rick
Dec 2014
#216
This seems to be a really hard question for you to answer. You are using a filibuster
Thinkingabout
Dec 2014
#217
It isn't much of a discussion if you only ask questions. Are you afraid to lay out your opinions? nm
rhett o rick
Dec 2014
#220
Well, if you can't answer the question I can conclude you may not know the value of work and the
Thinkingabout
Dec 2014
#221
See how easy that was. We got to your point w/o me having answer a bunch of inane questions.
rhett o rick
Dec 2014
#222
Then if you was not paid for your work (if any) we should resent the amount you received.
Thinkingabout
Dec 2014
#223
I was finding your rational somewhat strange when you complain about Hillary being
Thinkingabout
Dec 2014
#228
Someone keyed her in that blatantly taking bribes before and election doesn't sit
rhett o rick
Dec 2014
#128
It would be very hard for me to vote for someone who called my political beliefs foolish. nt
stillwaiting
Dec 2014
#108
Yeah.... what he said. Jeez... that's exactly how I saw it when she was a candidate.
AikidoSoul
Dec 2014
#116
so the only issue on a ballot in Missouri is the presidential election. That makes a lot of sense
still_one
Dec 2014
#167
No regulations from me, guys! Continue to steal and crash the economy! Nudge nudge wink wink
chrisa
Dec 2014
#35
We will continue to lose to Republicans if we are essentially the same as they are,
Zorra
Dec 2014
#36
On some issues, no question about it, but to ignore issues of women's right differences, civil
still_one
Dec 2014
#160
When progressives criticize Hillary = BAD! When Hillary attacks progressives: Not a problem!
ForgoTheConsequence
Dec 2014
#53
And people here wonder why some of us cannot bring ourselves to support her.
AngryOldDem
Dec 2014
#86
“Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it.” Santayana
Tierra_y_Libertad
Dec 2014
#96
Where is the actual quote from her? I do not accept characterizations of anyone's words.
Bluenorthwest
Dec 2014
#97
It's a paraphrase of a 2013 Politico paraphrase "according to accounts offered by several attendees"
ucrdem
Dec 2014
#100
Look what Hill's husband did to undermine public protection from bankers gambling with public money
AikidoSoul
Dec 2014
#105
"Bill Clinton did more to deregulate Wall Street than Ronald Reagan." That is a sad fact.
RiverLover
Dec 2014
#131
Hillary stands as ready as Bush and Romney to fuck over the middle class, sending more jobs to Asia
whereisjustice
Dec 2014
#169
unlike sanders, hillary doesn't believe that she can win on the basis of strong popular support.
redruddyred
Dec 2014
#176
I'd like to disagree with her strongly. WE did NOT all 'get into this mess together'
sabrina 1
Dec 2014
#178
So you favor the "take it slow" approach. Like we've been doing for the last 30 years
rhett o rick
Dec 2014
#215
SO THE RETHUGS WILL HAVE A BAGGER APPROVED CANDIDATE, AND THE HILL IS GOP NORMAL...
drynberg
Dec 2014
#182