Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
It would explain a thing or two... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2014 #1
Yes it would. . . ucrdem Dec 2014 #2
Hahaha MFrohike Dec 2014 #3
If it was meaningless, the GOP would not have added it alcibiades_mystery Dec 2014 #4
Chris Dodd and Barney Frank aren't GOP. ucrdem Dec 2014 #5
And they're acting like goddamn fools, if they think repealing this crucial part of their law alcibiades_mystery Dec 2014 #6
Inclusion of the Volcker rule was evidently requested by President Obama. ucrdem Dec 2014 #8
Don't worry everybody: they just want to eliminate the push out rule because it's a compliance alcibiades_mystery Dec 2014 #11
It would be far better to have both safeguards, I agree. ucrdem Dec 2014 #12
Push out was authored by Blanche Lincoln. geek tragedy Dec 2014 #18
No, it's one down one to go. They apparently had to get rid of two provisions. The GOP has okaawhatever Dec 2014 #10
I trust Sen. Warren't judgment about this. n/t pnwmom Dec 2014 #7
The bill had already been negotiated by both parties and the WH. ucrdem Dec 2014 #9
Push out involves trading certain derivatives geek tragedy Dec 2014 #13
"Proprietary trading" seems to be the term of art: ucrdem Dec 2014 #14
Yeah diff is banks can still deal in derivatives geek tragedy Dec 2014 #15
Be careful, you'll be called a far right winger for noting this. joshcryer Dec 2014 #16
So long as the taxpayers foot the bill at the casino, everything's all right. Octafish Dec 2014 #17
Well you know Congress, can't do anything until the very last minute. Rex Dec 2014 #19
They want everything. Octafish Dec 2014 #30
Thanks Octa, Aristide is a hero who speaks the truth, no question. ucrdem Dec 2014 #32
Hi, ucrdem. A party based on helping the vulnerable and poor doesn't shut down government, because: freshwest Dec 2014 #20
I remember how the Great Recession created a bunch of poor because neverforget Dec 2014 #21
Tell me about your own personal story, please. freshwest Dec 2014 #22
Do I have to be poor in order to understand that hundreds of thousands lost their jobs neverforget Dec 2014 #23
Do you have sympathy for those who will not be able to pay their rent in January with a shut down? freshwest Dec 2014 #24
Precisely fresh.. the President is trying to avoid a Shutdown like the goPhucks caused in 2013.. Cha Dec 2014 #25
So true. ucrdem Dec 2014 #33
Oh it wouldn't be them if they weren't showing off their ignorance and calling for his head. Cha Dec 2014 #36
You asked me my story not if I had sympathy for those who neverforget Dec 2014 #26
We start taking a stand now! aspirant Dec 2014 #28
Extortion is lovely. GeorgeGist Dec 2014 #29
I don't see it as extortion. ucrdem Dec 2014 #31
Exactamundo freshwest. ucrdem Dec 2014 #34
Thanks ucrdem. It's cruel and deadly. freshwest Dec 2014 #35
if Barney Frank is for it makes me feel better about it n/t kevinmc Dec 2014 #27
Barney Frank? What did he say, kevinmc? Cha Dec 2014 #37
According to NPR he was for it before he was against it . . . ucrdem Dec 2014 #39
K&R nt Andy823 Dec 2014 #38
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Dodd-Frank push-out provi...»Reply #37