Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Why are our Democratic office-holders such shrinking violets? [View all]99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)33. I'll look for it
your OP that is.
I don't know if you've been following how the CIA Torture Papers have been withheld from the US Senate,
despite lawful requests and demands from a Senate Committee on Intel, but here is how bad that has
gone, i.e. CIA admits spying on US Senators, so it's not a big stretch to imagine that "troublesome"
Senators may have "an unfortunate accident' of some kind for their trouble.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jul/31/cia-admits-spying-senate-staffers
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
55 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
How about connecting SS to the Deficit, when every Dem knows that is not even
sabrina 1
Oct 2014
#10
If not for the money, then why do the pols "do their [corporate] bidding"? nt
99th_Monkey
Oct 2014
#6
Other: Because they're perpetually afraid of losing the election that happened 10 years ago.
Warren DeMontague
Oct 2014
#7
I don't know what ever gave you the impression that Obama was a "progressive"
Spider Jerusalem
Oct 2014
#9
That's nice, did he have a Congress that would vote for all of those things?
Spider Jerusalem
Nov 2014
#41
"Center right moderate".. I call bullshite. You don't call this Progress.. as in it's Progressive?
Cha
Nov 2014
#42
Because they're, first and foremost, politicians whose goal is to get at retain power.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Oct 2014
#14
I voted "Other" because I think it was the smashing of Socialists and Communists in the 40s and 50s
KingCharlemagne
Oct 2014
#16
Yeah, the thought of McChinless at the Senate's helm for two years makes
KingCharlemagne
Oct 2014
#28
Other. Office holder behavior is multi-factorial, if you can label major axes
HereSince1628
Nov 2014
#47