Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Omaha Steve

(99,660 posts)
Sun Oct 19, 2014, 05:03 PM Oct 2014

Steve rescued two eagles Now he's facing criminal charges E action [View all]


Brian J. Towne (LaSalle County State's Attorney): Drop Charges Against Good Samaritan for Rescuing Bald Eagles

Andie Groff
Yorkville, Illinois


We are writing to you today regarding the trial of Mr. Steve Patterson; a man who rescued two bald eagles from a blown down nest in LaSalle County, Illinois in June 2013. We have been following this story since it happened, and have learned that a status hearing will be taking place on October 29, 2014 after last week’s mistrial.

Sir, we come before you not only as wildlife enthusiasts and nature lovers, but as constituents and taxpayers in this wonderful state of Illinois. The time, effort and money that has been spent in trying to prosecute this man could be used in so many other ways, such as going after true criminals by prosecuting those who are out to hurt; not those who are trying to help.

It was only after witnessing the eaglets on the ground for several days and seeing them injured that Mr. Patterson decided to take matters into his own hands. Yes, he broke the law, but most states have laws protecting people who rescue injured animals.

The federal Good Samaritan protection law is not available under Illinois law, which makes things very difficult for a person who is only trying to help an injured or suffering animal. The term “take”, as defined by Sec 1.2o of the Illinois Wildlife Code 520 ILCS 5/1.2o, “means hunt, shoot, pursue, lure, kill, destroy, capture, gig or spear, trap or ensnare, harass, or to attempt to do so.” These attributes make it sound like “taking” is done with malicious intent; not with the intent to rescue and help an injured animal. Clearly, Mr. Patterson’s intentions were not malicious. He did not take the eagles home to raise them as pets or attempt to nurse the eagles back to good health; he immediately contacted a professional with a license to do so.

If this man is prosecuted, it will set a precedent for people to turn their backs when they see an animal suffering. Wildlife rehabilitation facilities count on Good Samaritans to be their eyes and ears when they are unable to get to the phones or out to the rescue sites due to being overworked, understaffed, and self-funded for the most part. The world is already a callous and uncaring place with very few people who care for the well being of animals and nature. Every animal deserves a timely rescue, or a humane death, and that's where I believe most people's motives come from...not just for the animal to be saved, but to be relieved if it is in fact injured and/or suffering. We believe that Mr. Patterson’s motive was only to help the eagles.

We ask for your consideration in dropping all charges against Mr. Patterson. Please do not use our tax dollars to pay for a second trial. This county needs money to go into the local economy and to assist with the natural disasters it has faced over the past two years; not another trial for a man who picked up two birds. Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sign Andie’s petition: https://www.change.org/p/brian-j-towne-lasalle-county-state-s-attorney-drop-charges-against-good-samaritan-for-rescuing-bald-eagles?alert_id=ctswMRMaAm_r6n8U35p9bhmUglLKWJzUg8i00IjoxbEu%2BAdX8Ub4jE%3D&utm_campaign=162439&utm_medium=email&utm_source=action_alert#


15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Steve rescued two eagles ...