Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Thank You For Sharing cantbeserious Oct 2014 #1
Nice post and good work. PearliePoo2 Oct 2014 #2
I hope they take blood samples from all the people who are monitored Baitball Blogger Oct 2014 #3
No, it means they were never infected in the first place, never had symptoms, remember? Fred Sanders Oct 2014 #17
What about being asymptomatic? Baitball Blogger Oct 2014 #87
Rare immunities? No. Fred Sanders Oct 2014 #94
This doesn't compute with other virus. Baitball Blogger Oct 2014 #99
The evidence it occurred would be actual symptoms of the internal battle, Ebola is not like the virus Fred Sanders Oct 2014 #100
Too early to celebrate but that is good news. nt RiffRandell Oct 2014 #4
Definitely not time to celebrate. But clearly no cause for panic. morningfog Oct 2014 #6
No panic from me. nt RiffRandell Oct 2014 #7
I think people have differing defintions of "panic", around here. Warren DeMontague Oct 2014 #90
That is not panic. morningfog Oct 2014 #96
If it was airborne, we'd know it by now. Warren DeMontague Oct 2014 #102
Doctors already do what you are suggesting marions ghost Oct 2014 #124
During this period, we've come a long way in our preparations for MineralMan Oct 2014 #5
"Panicky" people haven't hurt anyone. But smug, over-confident people with insufficient protocols pnwmom Oct 2014 #8
Exactly. LisaL Oct 2014 #9
Yeah, but somehow they're less important . . . pnwmom Oct 2014 #10
A lot of people are monitored because Amber flew while already LisaL Oct 2014 #11
Please. Learn to read. morningfog Oct 2014 #18
I know how to read, thank you very much. LisaL Oct 2014 #22
Lol, okay. You ignore Patrick Sawyer and now Duncan morningfog Oct 2014 #31
How is it "fear mongering" to accurately state the number of people now under quarantine? nt pnwmom Oct 2014 #137
She was not, why are you now so blatantly lying? Fred Sanders Oct 2014 #23
WTF are you talking about? LisaL Oct 2014 #27
What does "potentially had other symptoms" mean? Thank you. uppityperson Oct 2014 #45
Ask CDC, because that's what they say. LisaL Oct 2014 #47
Link? either she had symptom or didn't. It is possible all the info has not been released though. uppityperson Oct 2014 #51
Here. LisaL Oct 2014 #54
Thanks, i was off looking at articles too. While terms like "may" have their uses, they can also be uppityperson Oct 2014 #57
They are monitoring over a 100 people exposed to her. LisaL Oct 2014 #59
I agree, question is was her tiredness and achiness due to ebola or another reason. Difficult to say uppityperson Oct 2014 #62
But the fact is she does have Ebola so the conservative medical presumption pnwmom Oct 2014 #138
Where the fuck did you get that? morningfog Oct 2014 #15
Too many folks here, including LisaL, are determined to spread fear and she is on a big team. Fred Sanders Oct 2014 #20
I know. There on some vultures hoping for mass casualty. morningfog Oct 2014 #28
Do not call the liars and fear mongers to their digital faces, get alerted and too many live in the Fred Sanders Oct 2014 #32
Who exactly is the liar here? LisaL Oct 2014 #46
Get what? LisaL Oct 2014 #30
Where did anyone say someone is less important! morningfog Oct 2014 #34
Who has said anyone is less important? uppityperson Oct 2014 #48
Which is clearly stated in the OP. morningfog Oct 2014 #19
LOL, you have been the most panicy person here. nt Logical Oct 2014 #43
A Haitian woman threw up in public, 911 call of "Liberian woman who says she has ebola" . uppityperson Oct 2014 #12
Some folks are determined to be afraid and reject facts in favor of fantasy to support the fear. Fred Sanders Oct 2014 #26
OMG!!!! My son threw up today!! kdmorris Oct 2014 #71
It's the beginning of the flu season. So obviously people will be sufering from "flu-like symptoms." Louisiana1976 Oct 2014 #76
Panicky idiots have caused schools to close, morningfog Oct 2014 #14
And because travel restrictions were not put on Mr. Duncan's contacts ( I guess somebody was so LisaL Oct 2014 #42
And NOT treating a level 4 pathogen with the respect it deserves may still end up taking the lives Warren DeMontague Oct 2014 #95
LOL, need links to some stories about panic??? I have a lot of them! nt Logical Oct 2014 #39
They haven't? Really? MineralMan Oct 2014 #75
I agree with you. Warren DeMontague Oct 2014 #86
+1 nt laundry_queen Oct 2014 #130
...^ that 840high Oct 2014 #131
This message was self-deleted by its author uppityperson Oct 2014 #132
Navarro College, TX, is rejecting students from Nigeria. uppityperson Oct 2014 #134
Yes. Observation and when appropriate quarantine of those who could possibly JDPriestly Oct 2014 #24
I am very relieved to see all his post-hospitalization contacts in the clear. kestrel91316 Oct 2014 #13
That's inacurate. LisaL Oct 2014 #16
But they are at the end of the typical incubation period. morningfog Oct 2014 #21
That's false. Only 10 days since he died. LisaL Oct 2014 #25
Look up "incubation period" for a dead body....sheesh..... Fred Sanders Oct 2014 #29
Bodies are highly infectious. LisaL Oct 2014 #33
The body was properly disposed of...look up incubation period for a dead body.... Fred Sanders Oct 2014 #36
Look for what incubation period means. LisaL Oct 2014 #38
Look at the average and mean incubation rates. morningfog Oct 2014 #37
You can't assume that everybody and everything will be average. LisaL Oct 2014 #40
More than average, the vast majority. morningfog Oct 2014 #41
You are posting false information. LisaL Oct 2014 #44
Because she had only a 99.5 temp, her viral load was low. morningfog Oct 2014 #50
Again, what are you qualifications? LisaL Oct 2014 #52
I'm not an idiot. morningfog Oct 2014 #53
You made a claim. So it's not good enough. LisaL Oct 2014 #55
I have no interest in trying to educate you, morningfog Oct 2014 #56
I have been trying to educate you, but it appears to be pointless. LisaL Oct 2014 #58
Holy shit! This is not debatable. It's basic stuff. morningfog Oct 2014 #60
Again, all I have is your word. LisaL Oct 2014 #66
From your link: morningfog Oct 2014 #89
Here you go. uppityperson Oct 2014 #61
That is not what I am asking. LisaL Oct 2014 #63
"Ebola virus RNA levels at the time of fever and symptom onset are typically low" uppityperson Oct 2014 #65
When was the onset of symptoms for her? LisaL Oct 2014 #68
I thought you said " I am asking for correlation between patient's fever and patient's viral load." uppityperson Oct 2014 #70
It doesn't. LisaL Oct 2014 #72
The graph was extra. The link and copied bit talked about it. uppityperson Oct 2014 #73
No, it doesn't. LisaL Oct 2014 #74
Are you looking for a study between how high a fever is and viral load or just uppityperson Oct 2014 #79
The OP poster made a claim that because her fever was low, her viral load was low. LisaL Oct 2014 #81
OK. There are several things being mixed together here. uppityperson Oct 2014 #85
You can read the actual article in the New England Journal of Medicine. LisaL Oct 2014 #101
Link? I couldn't find it. Thank you. uppityperson Oct 2014 #107
And when do those who never have a fever have a high viral load? You think they are just causually morningfog Oct 2014 #92
They think it is possible for someone to have NO sypmptoms and a high viral load. morningfog Oct 2014 #91
It would be interesting to see time, temp, viral load, other sx all graphed as to uppityperson Oct 2014 #98
She wasn't reported as spewing bodily fluids all over, Demit Oct 2014 #78
Dead bodies are said to be higly infectious. LisaL Oct 2014 #80
I don't think she was reported as flying while dead, either. Demit Oct 2014 #83
Epidemiology 101 would be behind her capacity, no more need be said. Fred Sanders Oct 2014 #104
Did you take epidemiology? LisaL Oct 2014 #108
You seem to be the one who is freaking out for no reason! nt Logical Oct 2014 #122
Argumentativeness, tho, that she's expert in! Demit Oct 2014 #129
Maybe she meant "pre-hospitalization contacts". uppityperson Oct 2014 #49
GREAT POST! Logic and common sense and critical thinking. Wow, much needed on the DU! nt Logical Oct 2014 #35
several people have pointed out that your information is wrong ecstatic Oct 2014 #64
Doesn't this part talk about Vinson's and Pham's contacts? I am confused. Thanks. uppityperson Oct 2014 #67
Nothing in the OP is inaccurate. The last bit is my opinion. morningfog Oct 2014 #69
I dunno. LisaL Oct 2014 #77
LOL Egnever Oct 2014 #82
And Patrick Sawyer. The inability to engage in critical thought over fear is astounding. morningfog Oct 2014 #84
Why do you keep bringing up Patrick Sawyer? LisaL Oct 2014 #93
How many people did he infect while flying? morningfog Oct 2014 #97
You are misinformed. LisaL Oct 2014 #105
He infected no one while flying, this is a deflection from that fact. The guy could have been Fred Sanders Oct 2014 #110
Your insults are getting absurd. LisaL Oct 2014 #118
Did you know the ebola crisis in Nigeria is over, they contained it! You have no such faith in Obama Fred Sanders Oct 2014 #119
And he also infected another ECOWAS diplomat who didn't die (but fled quarantine and infected LisaL Oct 2014 #115
The CDC, who got their information from Vinson, Ms. Toad Oct 2014 #103
Did you even read the WHO report?? It says...... Logical Oct 2014 #126
of course I did... as far as the other 2% ecstatic Oct 2014 #135
Needless panic and freaking out makes me mad! nt Logical Oct 2014 #136
It's awesome if no one in that apartment caught it from him. Warren DeMontague Oct 2014 #88
No, we can not look forward to more fear mongering as there are no direct flights and the points Fred Sanders Oct 2014 #106
"no direct flights" has nothing to do with the state department issuing travel visas. Warren DeMontague Oct 2014 #109
I agree with the medical science , not Glenn Beck, but different strokes. Fred Sanders Oct 2014 #111
And, again. Warren DeMontague Oct 2014 #113
What about Nigeria, are you serious that the borders are leak proof, really? Fred Sanders Oct 2014 #114
Will you please do your research, first? Warren DeMontague Oct 2014 #117
Nigeria contained the virus and is officially free of it, you have no faith in America, I get it. Fred Sanders Oct 2014 #120
Now I have to think you're just putting me on. Warren DeMontague Oct 2014 #127
Travel restriction were imposed as they had shared borders, those were closed, no others. Fred Sanders Oct 2014 #121
Also Nigeria does not share a border with the affected countries, in fact it's 1000 miles away. Warren DeMontague Oct 2014 #128
Well, you can always hope another one gets through, the media is salivating for one. Like I said Fred Sanders Oct 2014 #112
Funny you should mention Nigeria, which had upwards of 20 secondary and tertiary cases from one guy- Warren DeMontague Oct 2014 #116
not all of the people who cared for Mr. Duncan have the same timeline TorchTheWitch Oct 2014 #123
Good point. 840high Oct 2014 #133
Good news. Thanks. Tweedy Oct 2014 #125
Thanks for the summary. WhiteAndNerdy Oct 2014 #139
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Dallas Ebola infection/in...»Reply #29